LITMIR.BIZ

Скачать книгу

testable?

      <--- Score

      75. Is the ELK stack scope manageable?

      <--- Score

      76. What is the definition of success?

      <--- Score

      77. What scope to assess?

      <--- Score

      78. What was the context?

      <--- Score

      79. If substitutes have been appointed, have they been briefed on the ELK stack goals and received regular communications as to the progress to date?

      <--- Score

      80. What specifically is the problem? Where does it occur? When does it occur? What is its extent?

      <--- Score

      81. Is the current ‘as is’ process being followed? If not, what are the discrepancies?

      <--- Score

      82. What is the scope of ELK stack?

      <--- Score

      83. What is the scope of the ELK stack effort?

      <--- Score

      84. Do you all define ELK stack in the same way?

      <--- Score

      85. Is there a ELK stack management charter, including stakeholder case, problem and goal statements, scope, milestones, roles and responsibilities, communication plan?

      <--- Score

      86. Is the scope of ELK stack defined?

      <--- Score

      87. How will the ELK stack team and the group measure complete success of ELK stack?

      <--- Score

      88. What sort of initial information to gather?

      <--- Score

      89. What is in scope?

      <--- Score

      90. Has anyone else (internal or external to the group) attempted to solve this problem or a similar one before? If so, what knowledge can be leveraged from these previous efforts?

      <--- Score

      91. What are the ELK stack tasks and definitions?

      <--- Score

      92. How is the team tracking and documenting its work?

      <--- Score

      93. What is out-of-scope initially?

      <--- Score

      94. When is/was the ELK stack start date?

      <--- Score

      95. What is the context?

      <--- Score

      96. What ELK stack services do you require?

      <--- Score

      97. Has a ELK stack requirement not been met?

      <--- Score

      98. Scope of sensitive information?

      <--- Score

      99. Is the improvement team aware of the different versions of a process: what they think it is vs. what it actually is vs. what it should be vs. what it could be?

      <--- Score

      100. How are consistent ELK stack definitions important?

      <--- Score

      101. Is it clearly defined in and to your organization what you do?

      <--- Score

      102. How do you hand over ELK stack context?

      <--- Score

      103. What customer feedback methods were used to solicit their input?

      <--- Score

      104. Are roles and responsibilities formally defined?

      <--- Score

      105. How will variation in the actual durations of each activity be dealt with to ensure that the expected ELK stack results are met?

      <--- Score

      106. Are accountability and ownership for ELK stack clearly defined?

      <--- Score

      107. How do you build the right business case?

      <--- Score

      108. Who is gathering ELK stack information?

      <--- Score

      109. Is there a completed, verified, and validated high-level ‘as is’ (not ‘should be’ or ‘could be’) stakeholder process map?

      <--- Score

      110. Where can you gather more information?

      <--- Score

      111. How did the ELK stack manager receive input to the development of a ELK stack improvement plan and the estimated completion dates/times of each activity?

      <--- Score

      112. How do you manage unclear ELK stack requirements?

      <--- Score

      113. How often are the team meetings?

      <--- Score

      114. What is the scope?

      <--- Score

      115. What are the compelling stakeholder reasons for embarking on ELK stack?

      <--- Score

      116. What key stakeholder process output measure(s) does ELK stack leverage and how?

      <--- Score

      117. What are the boundaries of the scope? What is in bounds and what is not? What is the start point? What is the stop point?

      <--- Score

      118. How was the ‘as is’ process map developed, reviewed, verified and validated?

      <--- Score

      119. What information do you gather?

      <--- Score

      120. Are resources adequate for the scope?

      <--- Score

      121. Have the customer needs been translated into specific, measurable requirements? How?

      <--- Score

      122. Have all basic functions of ELK stack been defined?

      <--- Score

      123. What gets examined?

      <--- Score

      124. Has the improvement team collected the ‘voice of the customer’ (obtained feedback – qualitative and quantitative)?

      <--- Score

      125. Have all of the relationships been defined properly?

      <--- Score

      126. What are the rough order estimates on cost savings/opportunities that ELK stack brings?

      <--- Score

      127. What is a worst-case scenario for losses?

      <--- Score

      128. What intelligence can you gather?

      <--- Score

      129. How would you define ELK stack leadership?

      <--- Score

      130. What is out of scope?

      <--- Score

      131. Is the team adequately staffed with the desired

Скачать книгу