LITMIR.BIZ

Скачать книгу

      50. Is the Green Infrastructure for Water Management scope manageable?

      <--- Score

      51. Is Green Infrastructure for Water Management currently on schedule according to the plan?

      <--- Score

      52. Is data collected and displayed to better understand customer(s) critical needs and requirements.

      <--- Score

      53. What are the requirements for audit information?

      <--- Score

      54. How does the Green Infrastructure for Water Management manager ensure against scope creep?

      <--- Score

      55. Do you all define Green Infrastructure for Water Management in the same way?

      <--- Score

      56. What is out-of-scope initially?

      <--- Score

      57. Has anyone else (internal or external to the group) attempted to solve this problem or a similar one before? If so, what knowledge can be leveraged from these previous efforts?

      <--- Score

      58. If substitutes have been appointed, have they been briefed on the Green Infrastructure for Water Management goals and received regular communications as to the progress to date?

      <--- Score

      59. What information should you gather?

      <--- Score

      60. How do you think the partners involved in Green Infrastructure for Water Management would have defined success?

      <--- Score

      61. What sources do you use to gather information for a Green Infrastructure for Water Management study?

      <--- Score

      62. Are required metrics defined, what are they?

      <--- Score

      63. Is the scope of Green Infrastructure for Water Management defined?

      <--- Score

      64. What are the Green Infrastructure for Water Management tasks and definitions?

      <--- Score

      65. Are there different segments of customers?

      <--- Score

      66. What Green Infrastructure for Water Management requirements should be gathered?

      <--- Score

      67. Is there regularly 100% attendance at the team meetings? If not, have appointed substitutes attended to preserve cross-functionality and full representation?

      <--- Score

      68. How do you hand over Green Infrastructure for Water Management context?

      <--- Score

      69. Has a Green Infrastructure for Water Management requirement not been met?

      <--- Score

      70. Is the work to date meeting requirements?

      <--- Score

      71. How was the ‘as is’ process map developed, reviewed, verified and validated?

      <--- Score

      72. Where can you gather more information?

      <--- Score

      73. What are the core elements of the Green Infrastructure for Water Management business case?

      <--- Score

      74. Are approval levels defined for contracts and supplements to contracts?

      <--- Score

      75. What scope to assess?

      <--- Score

      76. Are task requirements clearly defined?

      <--- Score

      77. Is the team equipped with available and reliable resources?

      <--- Score

      78. Has the Green Infrastructure for Water Management work been fairly and/or equitably divided and delegated among team members who are qualified and capable to perform the work? Has everyone contributed?

      <--- Score

      79. Who are the Green Infrastructure for Water Management improvement team members, including Management Leads and Coaches?

      <--- Score

      80. How can the value of Green Infrastructure for Water Management be defined?

      <--- Score

      81. How do you manage scope?

      <--- Score

      82. How did the Green Infrastructure for Water Management manager receive input to the development of a Green Infrastructure for Water Management improvement plan and the estimated completion dates/times of each activity?

      <--- Score

      83. What scope do you want your strategy to cover?

      <--- Score

      84. What is in scope?

      <--- Score

      85. Is the improvement team aware of the different versions of a process: what they think it is vs. what it actually is vs. what it should be vs. what it could be?

      <--- Score

      86. What key stakeholder process output measure(s) does Green Infrastructure for Water Management leverage and how?

      <--- Score

      87. How do you catch Green Infrastructure for Water Management definition inconsistencies?

      <--- Score

      88. Are roles and responsibilities formally defined?

      <--- Score

      89. Has everyone on the team, including the team leaders, been properly trained?

      <--- Score

      90. Do you have a Green Infrastructure for Water Management success story or case study ready to tell and share?

      <--- Score

      91. How do you manage unclear Green Infrastructure for Water Management requirements?

      <--- Score

      92. What is in the scope and what is not in scope?

      <--- Score

      93. What is the scope of the Green Infrastructure for Water Management effort?

      <--- Score

      94. Has the improvement team collected the ‘voice of the customer’ (obtained feedback – qualitative and quantitative)?

      <--- Score

      95. When is/was the Green Infrastructure for Water Management start date?

      <--- Score

      96. What sort of initial information to gather?

      <--- Score

      97. What are the Green Infrastructure for Water Management use cases?

      <--- Score

      98. How have you defined all Green Infrastructure for Water Management requirements first?

      <--- Score

      99. Who is gathering information?

      <--- Score

      100. Do the problem and goal statements meet the SMART criteria (specific, measurable, attainable, relevant, and time-bound)?

      <--- Score

      101. Why are you doing

Скачать книгу