LITMIR.BIZ

Скачать книгу

into the atmosphere and oceans by humans, as is contained in all living organisms today.⁶⁵

Around sixty per cent of this colossal quantity of material is absorbed by the oceans and vegetation for now; because carbon dioxide dissolves in water and plants can absorb it and convert it into biomass. But that does not mean that the element has disappeared. In the sea, acidification has already started to take place because carbon and water combine to form carbonic acid, as everyone familiar with chemistry or fizzy drinks well knows.⁶⁶

If you’ve ever downed a soft drink with too much carbonic acid, you get an idea of how countless sea organisms must feel as they are disturbed by carbon dioxide. Carbon dioxide has a slightly corrosive effect; organisms partly composed of calcite—like plankton or coral reefs—are extremely vulnerable to this. Coral reefs and the shells of organisms like diatoms, which are at the beginning of the food chain, are therefore endangered by acidification, which leads to the coral bleaching. While there are methods by which coral reefs buffer acidity, this is only possible to a certain extent.⁶⁷ The negative consequences of acidification are considerable because of how they affect the marine food chain.⁶⁸

This development worries me much more than higher temperatures on land. The oceans cannot absorb unlimited quantities of carbon dioxide and, if a tipping point is ever reached, warmed seas could change from being repositories of greenhouse gases into becoming sources of greenhouse gas emissions. If the seas become warmed to their depths, and there are already indications that this is happening, frozen methane gas could thaw and be released into the atmosphere. Methane is a much more potent heat-trapping gas than carbon dioxide.⁶⁹, ⁷⁰

At the beginning of industrialization, the concentration of carbon dioxide in the atmosphere was around 280 parts per million molecules of air (ppm). At the time of the UN Climate Summit in Rio de Janiero, Brazil, in 1992, it had reached 356 ppm. In May 2013, at the monitoring station on the summit of the Mauna Loa volcano on the Big Island of Hawaii, the value exceeded 400 ppm, and according to current trends it will reach 440 ppm by 2040—a threshold that climate researchers regard as critical.⁷¹

Scientists from the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) continue to agree that emission of greenhouse gases caused by humans will increase the earth’s average temperature by at least two degrees Celsius by the end of this century. Apparent breaks in global warming trends appear to have more to do with complicated feedback mechanisms between the atmosphere and the oceans and a lack of measuring stations in the Arctic, rather than with incorrect scientific assumptions about climate change.⁷², ⁷³

      Two degrees Celsius does not sound like much, which is true when it refers to normal daytime temperatures. However, when applied to the global average temperature of the earth, it is comparable to human body temperature, where an increase of two degrees can make the difference between normal well-being and life-threatening illness. In extreme scenarios, average temperature could rise six degrees by the end of the century, and even higher in some regions. At the moment, the global average temperature is about five degrees warmer than at the peak of the last Ice Age, when glaciers in the Northern hemisphere soared hundreds of feet high. An increase in the average global temperature of five or six degrees would portend the beginning of a “Heat Age.”

      There is no certainty about what all this additional carbon dioxide will do to the earth. Scientific models are imprecise and not all future changes can be predicted. But, does that give us the liberty to play down the impact that people have on the climate the way that interest groups do, especially in the United States? Believing the climate change skeptics is taking an enormous risk for, if they are wrong, we will face a dangerous, perhaps irreversible situation. If the critics are proven right, little change will occur, except perhaps reasonable investments in environmental protection and renewable energy sources.

Underpinning the arguments of climate change skeptics is an assumption that humans are only a small factor in world events, so negligible that they cannot possibly trigger serious consequences. We shall simply carry on, they say. Advocates of this attitude think little of the Anthropocene idea. However, many scientific findings undermine the argument that human actions are only a trivial factor in earth events. The magnitude of the human factor is shown by one US Geological Survey study, according to which humans emit 135 times more carbon dioxide than all volcanoes combined.⁷⁴ Axel Kleidon from the Max Planck Institute for Biogeochemistry, in Jena, Germany, states that annual human consumption of free energy stands at approximately 50 terawatts, mainly due to burning fossil fuels and cultivating crops. This is equivalent to between five and ten per cent of free energy available. According to Kleidon, this is significantly more free energy than is produced by all the volcanoes, earthquakes and other tectonic events, combined.⁷⁵

Population growth, and space and energy requirements are the powerful forces propelling us out of the Holocene into the Anthropocene. Our abilities and needs, our knowledge and emotions, are beginning to transform not only the surface of the earth but also the future course of evolution—this is the fourth dimension of the Anthropocene. We are running populations of many plant and animal species down to the point of extinction. Biologists talk about a sixth wave of extinction in the history of the earth that is now underway, due to cutting down tropical rainforests, overfishing, overhunting, and a general loss of habitats.⁷⁶ Geologists will see a reflection of this in the fossils that will be left from our epoch.⁷⁷

Further, humans are beginning to create new life forms through interbreeding, gene technology and more recently, biotechnical design. Life forms of the future might be products of the human imagination: a scientist’s bracing walk through the forest might spawn a new form of life some months later. Trading and transport routes are bringing about large-scale changes in the distribution of animals, plants and other organisms and may determine whether they continue to exist at all. The figure that probably best symbolizes the transition from the Holocene to the Anthropocene is how matter is distributed among life forms. According to an estimate by Vaclav Smil, 10,000 years ago, humans and their livestock were a mere 0.1 per cent of the entire live weight of mammals. The other 99.9 per cent was being used by elephants, deer, gorillas, and so on. According to Smil’s estimate, 90 per cent of today’s mammalian matter is part of the soon-to-be eight to ten billion people on the earth, along with their billions of cattle, pigs, dogs and other domesticated creatures.⁷⁸ Human influence on the current and future course of evolution has become huge.

      In the course of my work as an environmental and science journalist over the past few years, I have experienced at first hand many of the problematic phenomena that scientists believe imply the end of the Holocene. I have stood in Borneo and in Amazonia, in the middle of a blazing rainforest. I have been scuba diving off the coasts of Mexico and Indonesia, observing devastated coral reefs. I have witnessed the clearing of old-growth forests on Vancouver Island in British Columbia, Canada and in Finland. I have traveled miles below the earth’s surface to places where nuclear waste is supposed to be stored for millions of years. I have trekked across melting glaciers in the Alps and have directly experienced the fragility of ecosystems in the Himalayas. In New Zealand and Central Africa, I have observed some of

Скачать книгу