LITMIR.BIZ

Скачать книгу

Score

      8. What is the context?

      <--- Score

      9. How do you manage changes in Government transparency requirements?

      <--- Score

      10. Has anyone else (internal or external to the group) attempted to solve this problem or a similar one before? If so, what knowledge can be leveraged from these previous efforts?

      <--- Score

      11. How will variation in the actual durations of each activity be dealt with to ensure that the expected Government transparency results are met?

      <--- Score

      12. Is scope creep really all bad news?

      <--- Score

      13. How do you gather the stories?

      <--- Score

      14. Does the team have regular meetings?

      <--- Score

      15. Is the work to date meeting requirements?

      <--- Score

      16. Are different versions of process maps needed to account for the different types of inputs?

      <--- Score

      17. What key stakeholder process output measure(s) does Government transparency leverage and how?

      <--- Score

      18. What is the worst case scenario?

      <--- Score

      19. What are the tasks and definitions?

      <--- Score

      20. Is the improvement team aware of the different versions of a process: what they think it is vs. what it actually is vs. what it should be vs. what it could be?

      <--- Score

      21. Has the direction changed at all during the course of Government transparency? If so, when did it change and why?

      <--- Score

      22. Is there a clear Government transparency case definition?

      <--- Score

      23. How do you manage scope?

      <--- Score

      24. Are there different segments of customers?

      <--- Score

      25. Has your scope been defined?

      <--- Score

      26. Has a team charter been developed and communicated?

      <--- Score

      27. Are there any constraints known that bear on the ability to perform Government transparency work? How is the team addressing them?

      <--- Score

      28. How are consistent Government transparency definitions important?

      <--- Score

      29. Who is gathering Government transparency information?

      <--- Score

      30. Have the customer needs been translated into specific, measurable requirements? How?

      <--- Score

      31. Is there any additional Government transparency definition of success?

      <--- Score

      32. How do you gather Government transparency requirements?

      <--- Score

      33. Who defines (or who defined) the rules and roles?

      <--- Score

      34. Where can you gather more information?

      <--- Score

      35. How will the Government transparency team and the group measure complete success of Government transparency?

      <--- Score

      36. What baselines are required to be defined and managed?

      <--- Score

      37. Are task requirements clearly defined?

      <--- Score

      38. Have all basic functions of Government transparency been defined?

      <--- Score

      39. Is the team sponsored by a champion or stakeholder leader?

      <--- Score

      40. Is full participation by members in regularly held team meetings guaranteed?

      <--- Score

      41. Has the improvement team collected the ‘voice of the customer’ (obtained feedback – qualitative and quantitative)?

      <--- Score

      42. Is there regularly 100% attendance at the team meetings? If not, have appointed substitutes attended to preserve cross-functionality and full representation?

      <--- Score

      43. How do you manage unclear Government transparency requirements?

      <--- Score

      44. Are approval levels defined for contracts and supplements to contracts?

      <--- Score

      45. How does the Government transparency manager ensure against scope creep?

      <--- Score

      46. Will team members regularly document their Government transparency work?

      <--- Score

      47. Is there a completed SIPOC representation, describing the Suppliers, Inputs, Process, Outputs, and Customers?

      <--- Score

      48. Are resources adequate for the scope?

      <--- Score

      49. What are the rough order estimates on cost savings/opportunities that Government transparency brings?

      <--- Score

      50. When is/was the Government transparency start date?

      <--- Score

      51. How do you catch Government transparency definition inconsistencies?

      <--- Score

      52. What Government transparency requirements should be gathered?

      <--- Score

      53. What sort of initial information to gather?

      <--- Score

      54. What are the compelling stakeholder reasons for embarking on Government transparency?

      <--- Score

      55. How can the value of Government transparency be defined?

      <--- Score

      56. What is in the scope and what is not in scope?

      <--- Score

      57. Has a Government transparency requirement not been met?

      <--- Score

      58. What is the definition of Government transparency excellence?

      <--- Score

      59. What is out-of-scope initially?

      <--- Score

      60. Do you all define Government transparency in the same way?

      <--- Score

      61. What are the core elements of the Government transparency business case?

      <--- Score

      62. How was the ‘as is’ process map developed, reviewed, verified and validated?

Скачать книгу