LITMIR.BIZ

Скачать книгу

is clearly the inference.

      SOCRATES: Surely, then, the just man will never consent to do injustice?

      GORGIAS: Certainly not.

      SOCRATES: And according to the argument the rhetorician must be a just man?

      GORGIAS: Yes.

      SOCRATES: And will therefore never be willing to do injustice?

      GORGIAS: Clearly not.

      SOCRATES: But do you remember saying just now that the trainer is not to be accused or banished if the pugilist makes a wrong use of his pugilistic art; and in like manner, if the rhetorician makes a bad and unjust use of his rhetoric, that is not to be laid to the charge of his teacher, who is not to be banished, but the wrong-doer himself who made a bad use of his rhetoric—he is to be banished—was not that said?

      GORGIAS: Yes, it was.

      SOCRATES: But now we are affirming that the aforesaid rhetorician will never have done injustice at all?

      GORGIAS: True.

      SOCRATES: And at the very outset, Gorgias, it was said that rhetoric treated of discourse, not (like arithmetic) about odd and even, but about just and unjust? Was not this said?

      GORGIAS: Yes.

      SOCRATES: I was thinking at the time, when I heard you saying so, that rhetoric, which is always discoursing about justice, could not possibly be an unjust thing. But when you added, shortly afterwards, that the rhetorician might make a bad use of rhetoric I noted with surprise the inconsistency into which you had fallen; and I said, that if you thought, as I did, that there was a gain in being refuted, there would be an advantage in going on with the question, but if not, I would leave off. And in the course of our investigations, as you will see yourself, the rhetorician has been acknowledged to be incapable of making an unjust use of rhetoric, or of willingness to do injustice. By the dog, Gorgias, there will be a great deal of discussion, before we get at the truth of all this.

      POLUS: And do even you, Socrates, seriously believe what you are now saying about rhetoric? What! because Gorgias was ashamed to deny that the rhetorician knew the just and the honourable and the good, and admitted that to any one who came to him ignorant of them he could teach them, and then out of this admission there arose a contradiction—the thing which you dearly love, and to which not he, but you, brought the argument by your captious questions—(do you seriously believe that there is any truth in all this?) For will any one ever acknowledge that he does not know, or cannot teach, the nature of justice? The truth is, that there is great want of manners in bringing the argument to such a pass.

      SOCRATES: Illustrious Polus, the reason why we provide ourselves with friends and children is, that when we get old and stumble, a younger generation may be at hand to set us on our legs again in our words and in our actions: and now, if I and Gorgias are stumbling, here are you who should raise us up; and I for my part engage to retract any error into which you may think that I have fallen-upon one condition:

      POLUS: What condition?

      SOCRATES: That you contract, Polus, the prolixity of speech in which you indulged at first.

      POLUS: What! do you mean that I may not use as many words as I please?

      SOCRATES: Only to think, my friend, that having come on a visit to Athens, which is the most free-spoken state in Hellas, you when you got there, and you alone, should be deprived of the power of speech—that would be hard indeed. But then consider my case:—shall not I be very hardly used, if, when you are making a long oration, and refusing to answer what you are asked, I am compelled to stay and listen to you, and may not go away? I say rather, if you have a real interest in the argument, or, to repeat my former expression, have any desire to set it on its legs, take back any statement which you please; and in your turn ask and answer, like myself and Gorgias—refute and be refuted: for I suppose that you would claim to know what Gorgias knows—would you not?

      POLUS: Yes.

      SOCRATES: And you, like him, invite any one to ask you about anything which he pleases, and you will know how to answer him?

      POLUS: To be sure.

      SOCRATES: And now, which will you do, ask or answer?

      POLUS: I will ask; and do you answer me, Socrates, the same question which Gorgias, as you suppose, is unable to answer: What is rhetoric?

      SOCRATES: Do you mean what sort of an art?

      POLUS: Yes.

      SOCRATES: To say the truth, Polus, it is not an art at all, in my opinion.

      POLUS: Then what, in your opinion, is rhetoric?

      SOCRATES: A thing which, as I was lately reading in a book of yours, you say that you have made an art.

      POLUS: What thing?

      SOCRATES: I should say a sort of experience.

      POLUS: Does rhetoric seem to you to be an experience?

      SOCRATES: That is my view, but you may be of another mind.

      POLUS: An experience in what?

      SOCRATES: An experience in producing a sort of delight and gratification.

      POLUS: And if able to gratify others, must not rhetoric be a fine thing?

      SOCRATES: What are you saying, Polus? Why do you ask me whether rhetoric is a fine thing or not, when I have not as yet told you what rhetoric is?

      POLUS: Did I not hear you say that rhetoric was a sort of experience?

      SOCRATES: Will you, who are so desirous to gratify others, afford a slight gratification to me?

      POLUS: I will.

      SOCRATES: Will you ask me, what sort of an art is cookery?

      POLUS: What sort of an art is cookery?

      SOCRATES: Not an art at all, Polus.

      POLUS: What then?

      SOCRATES: I should say an experience.

      POLUS: In what? I wish that you would explain to me.

      SOCRATES: An experience in producing a sort of delight and gratification, Polus.

      POLUS: Then are cookery and rhetoric the same?

      SOCRATES: No, they are only different parts of the same profession.

      POLUS: Of what profession?

      SOCRATES: I am afraid that the truth may seem discourteous; and I hesitate to answer, lest Gorgias should imagine that I am making fun of his own profession. For whether or no this is that art of rhetoric which Gorgias practises I really cannot tell:—from what he was just now saying, nothing appeared of what he thought of his art, but the rhetoric which I mean is a part of a not very creditable whole.

      GORGIAS: A part of what, Socrates? Say what you mean, and never mind me.

      SOCRATES: In my opinion then, Gorgias, the whole of which rhetoric is a part is not an art at all, but the habit of a bold and ready wit, which knows how to manage mankind: this habit I sum up under the word 'flattery'; and it appears to me to have many other parts, one of which is cookery, which may seem to be an art, but, as I maintain, is only an experience or routine and not an art:—another part is rhetoric, and the art of attiring and sophistry are two others: thus there are four branches, and four different things answering to them. And Polus may ask, if he likes, for he has not as yet been informed, what part of flattery is rhetoric: he did not see that I had not yet answered him when he proceeded to ask a further question: Whether I do not think rhetoric a fine thing? But I shall not tell him whether rhetoric is a fine thing or not, until I have first answered, 'What is rhetoric?' For that would not be right, Polus; but I shall be happy to answer, if you will ask me, What part of flattery is rhetoric?

      POLUS: I will ask and do you answer? What part of flattery is rhetoric?

      SOCRATES: Will you understand my answer? Rhetoric, according to my view, is the ghost or counterfeit

Скачать книгу