Скачать книгу

Does the merit of the course have any bearing on the merit of the methods used?

      10. Illustrate an unworthy method of using persuasion.

      11. Deliver a short speech on the value of skill in persuasion.

      12. Does effective persuasion always produce conviction?

      13. Does conviction always result in action?

      14. Is it fair for counsel to appeal to the emotions of a jury in a murder trial?

      15. Ought the judge use persuasion in making his charge?

      16. Say how self-consciousness may hinder the power of persuasion in a speaker.

      17. Is emotion without words ever persuasive? If so, illustrate.

      18. Might gestures without words be persuasive? If so, illustrate.

      19. Has posture in a speaker anything to do with persuasion? Discuss.

      20. Has voice? Discuss.

      21. Has manner? Discuss.

      22. What effect does personal magnetism have in producing conviction?

      23. Discuss the relation of persuasion to (a) description; (b) narration; (c) exposition; (d) pure reason.

      24. What is the effect of over-persuasion?

      25. Make a short speech on the effect of the constant use of persuasion on the sincerity of the speaker himself.

      26. Show by example how a general statement is not as persuasive as a concrete example illustrating the point being discussed.

      27. Show by example how brevity is of value in persuasion.

      28. Discuss the importance of avoiding an antagonistic attitude in persuasion.

      29. What is the most persuasive passage you have found in the selections of this volume. On what do you base your decision?

      30. Cite a persuasive passage from some other source. Read or recite it aloud.

      31. Make a list of the emotional bases of appeal, grading them from low to high, according to your estimate.

      32. Would circumstances make any difference in such grading? If so, give examples.

      33. Deliver a short, passionate appeal to a jury, pleading for justice to a poor widow.

      34. Deliver a short appeal to men to give up some evil way.

      35. Criticise the structure of the sentence beginning with the last line of page 296.

      CHAPTER XXV

      INFLUENCING THE CROWD

       Table of Contents

      Success in business, in the last analysis, turns upon touching the imagination of crowds. The reason that preachers in this present generation are less successful in getting people to want goodness than business men are in getting them to want motorcars, hats, and pianolas, is that business men as a class are more close and desperate students of human nature, and have boned down harder to the art of touching the imaginations of the crowds.—Gerald Stanley Lee, Crowds.

      In the early part of July, 1914, a collection of Frenchmen in Paris, or Germans in Berlin, was not a crowd in a psychological sense. Each individual had his own special interests and needs, and there was no powerful common idea to unify them. A group then represented only a collection of individuals. A month later, any collection of Frenchmen or Germans formed a crowd: Patriotism, hate, a common fear, a pervasive grief, had unified the individuals.

      The psychology of the crowd is far different from the psychology of the personal members that compose it. The crowd is a distinct entity. Individuals restrain and subdue many of their impulses at the dictates of reason. The crowd never reasons. It only feels. As persons there is a sense of responsibility attached to our actions which checks many of our incitements, but the sense of responsibility is lost in the crowd because of its numbers. The crowd is exceedingly suggestible and will act upon the wildest and most extreme ideas. The crowd-mind is primitive and will cheer plans and perform actions which its members would utterly repudiate.

      History will show us how the crowd-mind works. The medieval mind was not given to reasoning; the medieval man attached great weight to the utterance of authority; his religion touched chiefly the emotions. These conditions provided a rich soil for the propagation of the crowd-mind when, in the eleventh century, flagellation, a voluntary self-scourging, was preached by the monks. Substituting flagellation for reciting penitential psalms was advocated by the reformers. A scale was drawn up, making one thousand strokes equivalent to ten psalms, or fifteen thousand to the entire psalter. This craze spread by leaps—and crowds. Flagellant fraternities sprang up. Priests carrying banners led through the streets great processions reciting prayers and whipping their bloody bodies with leathern thongs fitted with four iron points. Pope Clement denounced this practise and several of the leaders of these processions had to be burned at the stake before the frenzy could be uprooted.

      All western and central Europe was turned into a crowd by the preaching of the crusaders, and millions of the followers of the Prince of Peace rushed to the Holy Land to kill the heathen. Even the children started on a crusade against the Saracens. The mob-spirit was so strong that home affections and persuasion could not prevail against it and thousands of mere babes died in their attempts to reach and redeem the Sacred Sepulchre.

      In the early part of the eighteenth century the South Sea Company was formed in England. Britain became a speculative crowd. Stock in the South Sea Company rose from 128-1/2 points in January to 550 in May, and scored 1,000 in July. Five million shares were sold at this premium. Speculation ran riot. Hundreds of companies were organized. One was formed "for a wheel of perpetual motion." Another never troubled to give any reason at all for taking the cash of its subscribers—it merely announced that it was organized "for a design which will hereafter be promulgated." Owners began to sell, the mob caught the suggestion, a panic ensued, the South Sea Company stock fell 800 points in a few days, and more than a billion dollars evaporated in this era of frenzied speculation.

      The burning of the witches at Salem, the Klondike gold craze, and the forty-eight people who were killed by mobs in the United States in 1913, are examples familiar to us in America.

      The Crowd Must Have a Leader

      The leader of the crowd or mob is its determining factor. He becomes self-hypnotized with the idea that unifies its members, his enthusiasm is contagious—and so is theirs. The crowd acts as he suggests. The great mass of people do not have any very sharply-drawn conclusions on any subject outside of their own little spheres, but when they become a crowd they are perfectly willing to accept ready-made, hand-me-down opinions. They will follow a leader at all costs—in labor troubles they often follow a leader in preference to obeying their government, in war they will throw self-preservation to the bushes and follow a leader in the face of guns that fire fourteen times a second. The mob becomes shorn of will-power and blindly obedient to its dictator. The Russian Government, recognizing the menace of the crowd-mind to its autocracy, formerly prohibited public gatherings. History is full of similar instances.

      How the Crowd is Created

      Today

Скачать книгу