Скачать книгу

abroad.2

      I agree. I believe that the “stakes,” “tethers,” and “cords” of classical orthodoxy; the Reformation understanding of the gospel; and Great Awakening beliefs and behaviors including missions/missiology reflect what the evangelical movement and its mission should be if it is to have a future (Figure 1). It goes without saying that I cannot do justice to the whole of that history. I probably will not do justice to all that Sweeney has in mind, and for that I apologize. I ask the reader to think of what follows in Part I as no more than a series of snapshots of the history involved and to do his or her own study to fill in the gaps of which there will be many.

      Figure 1. Three sources of Evangelicalism

      1. Sweeney, “Introduction.” See also, Sweeney, American Evangelical Story, 82.

      2. Sweeney, “Introduction,” 2.

      3. Dockery and George, Great Tradition.

      4. Oden, Rebirth of Orthodoxy, 32.

      Chapter 1

      “Based on Classical Christian Orthodoxy”

      Acknowledging a special debt to Douglas Sweeney’s historically oriented definition of what it means to be evangelical on the one hand, and what has proved to be a complementary study of The Great Tradition of Christian Thinking by David Dockery and Timothy George on the other, we begin our study with the early church and the apostolic fathers. With the completion of the earthly ministry of the Lord Jesus and his return to the Father, where did they find true doctrine and divine direction? Paul answers that question in large part when, addressing the church at Thessalonica, he admonished believers to “stand firm and hold to the traditions that you were taught by us, either by our spoken word or by our letter” (2 Thess 2:15). The Christian great tradition begins with the inspiration and inscripturation of the word of God and proceeds with its proclamation, dissemination, and instruction.

      The Scripture Canon: The Old and New Testaments

      The great tradition is not only rooted in the biblical text itself but also in the history of the study and interpretation of the biblical text. It shows that, historically, Bible interpretation was informed by approaches inherited from intertesta­mental Judaism and the Graeco-Roman world of the apostles. However, with the passing of the apostles various needs surfaced: the need for an authoritative Scripture canon, the need to clarify and defend apostolic beliefs and practices, the need to encounter and counter false religionists, the need to reply to heresies within the church, and the need to respond to persecution from without the church. In one form or another—and to one or another degree—these challenges continued and were met by the church throughout the classical period and beyond.

      The apostolic witness contained in the writings of the apostles, then, was the authoritative source for addressing key issues that faced the early church. The following table summarizes these issues and key figures and events in the second through the fifth centuries of the church.

      Figure 2. Three main elements of classical orthodoxy

      Hermeneutics: Interpreting and Applying the Written Word

      The School at Alexandria

      Origen (185–254), who studied under Clement (ca. 150–215) of the school at Alexandria, was one of the first great scholars of the church and a leader of a catechetical School of Alexandria. In First Principles Origen systematized the rules of faith and distinguished between “necessary” doctrines delivered by the apostles and other doctrines. He believed that Bible interpretation must of necessity follow the rule of faith including the doctrines of God, Christ, and the Holy Spirit; the doctrine of spiritual beings including angels and Satan; and the doctrine of last things such as the reward of the righteous and the condemnation of the wicked.

      The School at Antioch

Скачать книгу