LITMIR.BIZ

Скачать книгу

according to the plan?

      <--- Score

      12. How and when will the baselines be defined?

      <--- Score

      13. What happens if Parameterized test’s scope changes?

      <--- Score

      14. Is the Parameterized test scope manageable?

      <--- Score

      15. Are there different segments of customers?

      <--- Score

      16. What is the definition of success?

      <--- Score

      17. Is there a critical path to deliver Parameterized test results?

      <--- Score

      18. What is in the scope and what is not in scope?

      <--- Score

      19. What constraints exist that might impact the team?

      <--- Score

      20. Are required metrics defined, what are they?

      <--- Score

      21. Is the improvement team aware of the different versions of a process: what they think it is vs. what it actually is vs. what it should be vs. what it could be?

      <--- Score

      22. How do you build the right business case?

      <--- Score

      23. Are all requirements met?

      <--- Score

      24. Are different versions of process maps needed to account for the different types of inputs?

      <--- Score

      25. Is there a completed, verified, and validated high-level ‘as is’ (not ‘should be’ or ‘could be’) stakeholder process map?

      <--- Score

      26. Does the scope remain the same?

      <--- Score

      27. When is the estimated completion date?

      <--- Score

      28. What are the requirements for audit information?

      <--- Score

      29. What is the scope of the Parameterized test effort?

      <--- Score

      30. How will variation in the actual durations of each activity be dealt with to ensure that the expected Parameterized test results are met?

      <--- Score

      31. Who is gathering Parameterized test information?

      <--- Score

      32. What are the dynamics of the communication plan?

      <--- Score

      33. What are the Parameterized test tasks and definitions?

      <--- Score

      34. How does the Parameterized test manager ensure against scope creep?

      <--- Score

      35. Does the team have regular meetings?

      <--- Score

      36. Have specific policy objectives been defined?

      <--- Score

      37. How do you manage unclear Parameterized test requirements?

      <--- Score

      38. What gets examined?

      <--- Score

      39. Is Parameterized test required?

      <--- Score

      40. How was the ‘as is’ process map developed, reviewed, verified and validated?

      <--- Score

      41. What critical content must be communicated – who, what, when, where, and how?

      <--- Score

      42. Is there a completed SIPOC representation, describing the Suppliers, Inputs, Process, Outputs, and Customers?

      <--- Score

      43. What scope do you want your strategy to cover?

      <--- Score

      44. How have you defined all Parameterized test requirements first?

      <--- Score

      45. Are resources adequate for the scope?

      <--- Score

      46. What information should you gather?

      <--- Score

      47. Who approved the Parameterized test scope?

      <--- Score

      48. How do you gather the stories?

      <--- Score

      49. What are the tasks and definitions?

      <--- Score

      50. Is the work to date meeting requirements?

      <--- Score

      51. How do you manage scope?

      <--- Score

      52. What scope to assess?

      <--- Score

      53. What key stakeholder process output measure(s) does Parameterized test leverage and how?

      <--- Score

      54. Is Parameterized test linked to key stakeholder goals and objectives?

      <--- Score

      55. What is out of scope?

      <--- Score

      56. Has the Parameterized test work been fairly and/or equitably divided and delegated among team members who are qualified and capable to perform the work? Has everyone contributed?

      <--- Score

      57. Has anyone else (internal or external to the group) attempted to solve this problem or a similar one before? If so, what knowledge can be leveraged from these previous efforts?

      <--- Score

      58. Who defines (or who defined) the rules and roles?

      <--- Score

      59. Is there a Parameterized test management charter, including stakeholder case, problem and goal statements, scope, milestones, roles and responsibilities, communication plan?

      <--- Score

      60. What are the Parameterized test use cases?

      <--- Score

      61. How do you keep key subject matter experts in the loop?

      <--- Score

      62. Is the scope of Parameterized test defined?

      <--- Score

      63. Has your scope been defined?

      <--- Score

      64. How is the team tracking and documenting its work?

      <--- Score

      65. What is the worst case scenario?

      <--- Score

      66. How are consistent Parameterized test definitions important?

      <--- Score

      67. How would you define the culture at your organization, how susceptible is it to Parameterized test changes?

      <--- Score

      68. Has a high-level ‘as is’ process map been completed, verified and validated?

      <---

Скачать книгу