Скачать книгу

among team members who are qualified and capable to perform the work? Has everyone contributed?

      <--- Score

      118. Have all basic functions of Threat and risk assessment been defined?

      <--- Score

      119. Has anyone else (internal or external to the group) attempted to solve this problem or a similar one before? If so, what knowledge can be leveraged from these previous efforts?

      <--- Score

      120. What specifically is the problem? Where does it occur? When does it occur? What is its extent?

      <--- Score

      121. Has the improvement team collected the ‘voice of the customer’ (obtained feedback – qualitative and quantitative)?

      <--- Score

      122. Where can you gather more information?

      <--- Score

      123. Does the scope remain the same?

      <--- Score

      124. Has your scope been defined?

      <--- Score

      125. Do you have a Threat and risk assessment success story or case study ready to tell and share?

      <--- Score

      126. Is there a completed, verified, and validated high-level ‘as is’ (not ‘should be’ or ‘could be’) stakeholder process map?

      <--- Score

      127. Are resources adequate for the scope?

      <--- Score

      128. How do you gather requirements?

      <--- Score

      129. Who are the Threat and risk assessment improvement team members, including Management Leads and Coaches?

      <--- Score

      130. What are the compelling stakeholder reasons for embarking on Threat and risk assessment?

      <--- Score

      131. Are audit criteria, scope, frequency and methods defined?

      <--- Score

      132. Are accountability and ownership for Threat and risk assessment clearly defined?

      <--- Score

      133. Is the improvement team aware of the different versions of a process: what they think it is vs. what it actually is vs. what it should be vs. what it could be?

      <--- Score

      Add up total points for this section: _____ = Total points for this section

      Divided by: ______ (number of statements answered) = ______ Average score for this section

      Transfer your score to the Threat and risk assessment Index at the beginning of the Self-Assessment.

      CRITERION #3: MEASURE:

      INTENT: Gather the correct data. Measure the current performance and evolution of the situation.

      In my belief, the answer to this question is clearly defined:

      5 Strongly Agree

      4 Agree

      3 Neutral

      2 Disagree

      1 Strongly Disagree

      1. What measurements are being captured?

      <--- Score

      2. Have you made assumptions about the shape of the future, particularly its impact on your customers and competitors?

      <--- Score

      3. How will you measure success?

      <--- Score

      4. Has a cost center been established?

      <--- Score

      5. How do you verify the Threat and risk assessment requirements quality?

      <--- Score

      6. What causes extra work or rework?

      <--- Score

      7. What does verifying compliance entail?

      <--- Score

      8. How are measurements made?

      <--- Score

      9. How is progress measured?

      <--- Score

      10. What measurements are possible, practicable and meaningful?

      <--- Score

      11. How do you verify performance?

      <--- Score

      12. What are the Threat and risk assessment key cost drivers?

      <--- Score

      13. What does a Test Case verify?

      <--- Score

      14. Are you able to realize any cost savings?

      <--- Score

      15. Do you have any cost Threat and risk assessment limitation requirements?

      <--- Score

      16. How do you measure success?

      <--- Score

      17. What are your primary costs, revenues, assets?

      <--- Score

      18. How are costs allocated?

      <--- Score

      19. What are your key Threat and risk assessment organizational performance measures, including key short and longer-term financial measures?

      <--- Score

      20. How can you reduce the costs of obtaining inputs?

      <--- Score

      21. Why a Threat and risk assessment focus?

      <--- Score

      22. What are your operating costs?

      <--- Score

      23. Which measures and indicators matter?

      <--- Score

      24. How do you prevent mis-estimating cost?

      <--- Score

      25. What are the estimated costs of proposed changes?

      <--- Score

      26. Does management have the right priorities among projects?

      <--- Score

      27. How to cause the change?

      <--- Score

      28. How will costs be allocated?

      <--- Score

      29. How will you measure your Threat and risk assessment effectiveness?

      <--- Score

      30. What could cause delays in the schedule?

      <--- Score

      31. What are allowable costs?

      <--- Score

      32. Are there competing Threat and risk assessment priorities?

      <--- Score

      33. What is your Threat and risk assessment quality cost segregation study?

      <--- Score

      34. Are the units of measure consistent?

      <--- Score

      35. At what cost?

      <--- Score

      36. Is there an opportunity

Скачать книгу