LITMIR.BIZ

Скачать книгу

Be aware of the need for change. Recognize that there is an unfavorable variation, problem or symptom.

      In my belief, the answer to this question is clearly defined:

      5 Strongly Agree

      4 Agree

      3 Neutral

      2 Disagree

      1 Strongly Disagree

      1. How do you assess your Message Queuing as a Service workforce capability and capacity needs, including skills, competencies, and staffing levels?

      <--- Score

      2. For your Message Queuing as a Service project, identify and describe the business environment, is there more than one layer to the business environment?

      <--- Score

      3. How are you going to measure success?

      <--- Score

      4. What are the stakeholder objectives to be achieved with Message Queuing as a Service?

      <--- Score

      5. What creative shifts do you need to take?

      <--- Score

      6. How do you take a forward-looking perspective in identifying Message Queuing as a Service research related to market response and models?

      <--- Score

      7. Whom do you really need or want to serve?

      <--- Score

      8. How do you recognize an objection?

      <--- Score

      9. How much are sponsors, customers, partners, stakeholders involved in Message Queuing as a Service? In other words, what are the risks, if Message Queuing as a Service does not deliver successfully?

      <--- Score

      10. What Message Queuing as a Service events should you attend?

      <--- Score

      11. Will new equipment/products be required to facilitate Message Queuing as a Service delivery, for example is new software needed?

      <--- Score

      12. Who needs budgets?

      <--- Score

      13. What situation(s) led to this Message Queuing as a Service Self Assessment?

      <--- Score

      14. Who needs to know about Message Queuing as a Service?

      <--- Score

      15. Are employees recognized for desired behaviors?

      <--- Score

      16. Is it needed?

      <--- Score

      17. Will a response program recognize when a crisis occurs and provide some level of response?

      <--- Score

      18. How can auditing be a preventative security measure?

      <--- Score

      19. Who defines the rules in relation to any given issue?

      <--- Score

      20. Do you have/need 24-hour access to key personnel?

      <--- Score

      21. What Message Queuing as a Service problem should be solved?

      <--- Score

      22. What would happen if Message Queuing as a Service weren’t done?

      <--- Score

      23. How are the Message Queuing as a Service’s objectives aligned to the group’s overall stakeholder strategy?

      <--- Score

      24. To what extent would your organization benefit from being recognized as a award recipient?

      <--- Score

      25. Are employees recognized or rewarded for performance that demonstrates the highest levels of integrity?

      <--- Score

      26. Why is this needed?

      <--- Score

      27. What needs to be done?

      <--- Score

      28. What activities does the governance board need to consider?

      <--- Score

      29. How many trainings, in total, are needed?

      <--- Score

      30. How does it fit into your organizational needs and tasks?

      <--- Score

      31. Have you identified your Message Queuing as a Service key performance indicators?

      <--- Score

      32. Are there regulatory / compliance issues?

      <--- Score

      33. Are your goals realistic? Do you need to redefine your problem? Perhaps the problem has changed or maybe you have reached your goal and need to set a new one?

      <--- Score

      34. Looking at each person individually – does every one have the qualities which are needed to work in this group?

      <--- Score

      35. Are controls defined to recognize and contain problems?

      <--- Score

      36. Who are your key stakeholders who need to sign off?

      <--- Score

      37. What Message Queuing as a Service coordination do you need?

      <--- Score

      38. Who else hopes to benefit from it?

      <--- Score

      39. To what extent does each concerned units management team recognize Message Queuing as a Service as an effective investment?

      <--- Score

      40. Who needs what information?

      <--- Score

      41. Which information does the Message Queuing as a Service business case need to include?

      <--- Score

      42. What are the clients issues and concerns?

      <--- Score

      43. Does the problem have ethical dimensions?

      <--- Score

      44. What are the timeframes required to resolve each of the issues/problems?

      <--- Score

      45. Are there any revenue recognition issues?

      <--- Score

      46. What are the minority interests and what amount of minority interests can be recognized?

      <--- Score

      47. How do you identify subcontractor relationships?

      <--- Score

      48. What is the problem and/or vulnerability?

      <--- Score

      49. Which needs are not included or involved?

      <--- Score

      50. What do employees need in the short term?

      <--- Score

      51. What vendors make products that address the Message Queuing as a Service needs?

      <--- Score

      52. What else needs to be measured?

      <--- Score

      53. Who should resolve

Скачать книгу