LITMIR.BIZ

Скачать книгу

How will variation in the actual durations of each activity be dealt with to ensure that the expected Blockchain as a service results are met?

      <--- Score

      66. How do you think the partners involved in Blockchain as a service would have defined success?

      <--- Score

      67. Is the team adequately staffed with the desired cross-functionality? If not, what additional resources are available to the team?

      <--- Score

      68. Are accountability and ownership for Blockchain as a service clearly defined?

      <--- Score

      69. What are the rough order estimates on cost savings/opportunities that Blockchain as a service brings?

      <--- Score

      70. Who approved the Blockchain as a service scope?

      <--- Score

      71. Is the current ‘as is’ process being followed? If not, what are the discrepancies?

      <--- Score

      72. How is the team tracking and documenting its work?

      <--- Score

      73. How have you defined all Blockchain as a service requirements first?

      <--- Score

      74. What key stakeholder process output measure(s) does Blockchain as a service leverage and how?

      <--- Score

      75. What is the scope?

      <--- Score

      76. How does the Blockchain as a service manager ensure against scope creep?

      <--- Score

      77. What system do you use for gathering Blockchain as a service information?

      <--- Score

      78. Does the scope remain the same?

      <--- Score

      79. The political context: who holds power?

      <--- Score

      80. How do you keep key subject matter experts in the loop?

      <--- Score

      81. Is the improvement team aware of the different versions of a process: what they think it is vs. what it actually is vs. what it should be vs. what it could be?

      <--- Score

      82. How do you catch Blockchain as a service definition inconsistencies?

      <--- Score

      83. Have specific policy objectives been defined?

      <--- Score

      84. What customer feedback methods were used to solicit their input?

      <--- Score

      85. What scope to assess?

      <--- Score

      86. What is in the scope and what is not in scope?

      <--- Score

      87. What is the definition of success?

      <--- Score

      88. Do the problem and goal statements meet the SMART criteria (specific, measurable, attainable, relevant, and time-bound)?

      <--- Score

      89. When is the estimated completion date?

      <--- Score

      90. Are required metrics defined, what are they?

      <--- Score

      91. Has a team charter been developed and communicated?

      <--- Score

      92. Has the direction changed at all during the course of Blockchain as a service? If so, when did it change and why?

      <--- Score

      93. Is the Blockchain as a service scope manageable?

      <--- Score

      94. What are (control) requirements for Blockchain as a service Information?

      <--- Score

      95. Are all requirements met?

      <--- Score

      96. Who are the Blockchain as a service improvement team members, including Management Leads and Coaches?

      <--- Score

      97. What are the core elements of the Blockchain as a service business case?

      <--- Score

      98. Are resources adequate for the scope?

      <--- Score

      99. What is the definition of Blockchain as a service excellence?

      <--- Score

      100. In what way can you redefine the criteria of choice clients have in your category in your favor?

      <--- Score

      101. What knowledge or experience is required?

      <--- Score

      102. What are the tasks and definitions?

      <--- Score

      103. How was the ‘as is’ process map developed, reviewed, verified and validated?

      <--- Score

      104. What are the record-keeping requirements of Blockchain as a service activities?

      <--- Score

      105. What sort of initial information to gather?

      <--- Score

      106. How do you hand over Blockchain as a service context?

      <--- Score

      107. Is there regularly 100% attendance at the team meetings? If not, have appointed substitutes attended to preserve cross-functionality and full representation?

      <--- Score

      108. Does the team have regular meetings?

      <--- Score

      109. What is out-of-scope initially?

      <--- Score

      110. Is there a completed SIPOC representation, describing the Suppliers, Inputs, Process, Outputs, and Customers?

      <--- Score

      111. How can the value of Blockchain as a service be defined?

      <--- Score

      112. Has a project plan, Gantt chart, or similar been developed/completed?

      <--- Score

      113. What specifically is the problem? Where does it occur? When does it occur? What is its extent?

      <--- Score

      114. What is in scope?

      <--- Score

      115. What information do you gather?

      <--- Score

      116. Has your scope been defined?

      <--- Score

      117. Who defines (or who defined) the rules and roles?

      <--- Score

      118. How do you gather Blockchain as a service requirements?

      <--- Score

      119. Are the Blockchain as a service requirements testable?

      <--- Score

      120. Do you have a Blockchain as a service success story or case study ready to tell and share?

      <---

Скачать книгу