LITMIR.BIZ

Скачать книгу

Architecture design software definition of success?

      <--- Score

      112. Has a high-level ‘as is’ process map been completed, verified and validated?

      <--- Score

      113. What are the core elements of the Architecture design software business case?

      <--- Score

      114. What Architecture design software requirements should be gathered?

      <--- Score

      115. If substitutes have been appointed, have they been briefed on the Architecture design software goals and received regular communications as to the progress to date?

      <--- Score

      116. Are resources adequate for the scope?

      <--- Score

      117. How was the ‘as is’ process map developed, reviewed, verified and validated?

      <--- Score

      118. How does the Architecture design software manager ensure against scope creep?

      <--- Score

      119. How do you think the partners involved in Architecture design software would have defined success?

      <--- Score

      120. Is the Architecture design software scope complete and appropriately sized?

      <--- Score

      121. When is/was the Architecture design software start date?

      <--- Score

      122. Is there a completed SIPOC representation, describing the Suppliers, Inputs, Process, Outputs, and Customers?

      <--- Score

      123. How are consistent Architecture design software definitions important?

      <--- Score

      124. What scope to assess?

      <--- Score

      125. How will the Architecture design software team and the group measure complete success of Architecture design software?

      <--- Score

      126. Have the customer needs been translated into specific, measurable requirements? How?

      <--- Score

      127. What sort of initial information to gather?

      <--- Score

      128. Is there a critical path to deliver Architecture design software results?

      <--- Score

      129. Have all basic functions of Architecture design software been defined?

      <--- Score

      130. Do you have a Architecture design software success story or case study ready to tell and share?

      <--- Score

      131. How did the Architecture design software manager receive input to the development of a Architecture design software improvement plan and the estimated completion dates/times of each activity?

      <--- Score

      132. How do you keep key subject matter experts in the loop?

      <--- Score

      133. Has/have the customer(s) been identified?

      <--- Score

      134. How would you define the culture at your organization, how susceptible is it to Architecture design software changes?

      <--- Score

      135. Is the team adequately staffed with the desired cross-functionality? If not, what additional resources are available to the team?

      <--- Score

      136. How do you manage scope?

      <--- Score

      Add up total points for this section: _____ = Total points for this section

      Divided by: ______ (number of statements answered) = ______ Average score for this section

      Transfer your score to the Architecture design software Index at the beginning of the Self-Assessment.

      CRITERION #3: MEASURE:

      INTENT: Gather the correct data. Measure the current performance and evolution of the situation.

      In my belief, the answer to this question is clearly defined:

      5 Strongly Agree

      4 Agree

      3 Neutral

      2 Disagree

      1 Strongly Disagree

      1. How do you verify the authenticity of the data and information used?

      <--- Score

      2. How much does it cost?

      <--- Score

      3. Are the measurements objective?

      <--- Score

      4. How are costs allocated?

      <--- Score

      5. How do you verify your resources?

      <--- Score

      6. What would be a real cause for concern?

      <--- Score

      7. How are measurements made?

      <--- Score

      8. Where is it measured?

      <--- Score

      9. Does the Architecture design software task fit the client’s priorities?

      <--- Score

      10. Did you tackle the cause or the symptom?

      <--- Score

      11. What is an unallowable cost?

      <--- Score

      12. Are missed Architecture design software opportunities costing your organization money?

      <--- Score

      13. How is the value delivered by Architecture design software being measured?

      <--- Score

      14. What could cause delays in the schedule?

      <--- Score

      15. Why do the measurements/indicators matter?

      <--- Score

      16. Where can you go to verify the info?

      <--- Score

      17. Is there an opportunity to verify requirements?

      <--- Score

      18. How do you measure variability?

      <--- Score

      19. Do you effectively measure and reward individual and team performance?

      <--- Score

      20. How frequently do you track Architecture design software measures?

      <--- Score

      21. What can be used to verify compliance?

      <--- Score

      22. How can you reduce costs?

      <--- Score

      23. How do you measure efficient delivery of Architecture design software services?

      <--- Score

      24. What drives O&M cost?

      <--- Score

      25. Are the units of measure consistent?

      <--- Score

Скачать книгу