LITMIR.BIZ

Скачать книгу

Score

      8. How do you hand over Environmental risk analysis context?

      <--- Score

      9. Are there any constraints known that bear on the ability to perform Environmental risk analysis work? How is the team addressing them?

      <--- Score

      10. What constraints exist that might impact the team?

      <--- Score

      11. Does the scope remain the same?

      <--- Score

      12. What are the Environmental risk analysis use cases?

      <--- Score

      13. How do you gather requirements?

      <--- Score

      14. What are the tasks and definitions?

      <--- Score

      15. When is the estimated completion date?

      <--- Score

      16. What specifically is the problem? Where does it occur? When does it occur? What is its extent?

      <--- Score

      17. What scope do you want your strategy to cover?

      <--- Score

      18. Is scope creep really all bad news?

      <--- Score

      19. How do you manage unclear Environmental risk analysis requirements?

      <--- Score

      20. How do you gather Environmental risk analysis requirements?

      <--- Score

      21. Are there different segments of customers?

      <--- Score

      22. Who is gathering Environmental risk analysis information?

      <--- Score

      23. How do you keep key subject matter experts in the loop?

      <--- Score

      24. Is the current ‘as is’ process being followed? If not, what are the discrepancies?

      <--- Score

      25. What gets examined?

      <--- Score

      26. What is a worst-case scenario for losses?

      <--- Score

      27. Are roles and responsibilities formally defined?

      <--- Score

      28. What Environmental risk analysis services do you require?

      <--- Score

      29. Are required metrics defined, what are they?

      <--- Score

      30. Are approval levels defined for contracts and supplements to contracts?

      <--- Score

      31. Is there a critical path to deliver Environmental risk analysis results?

      <--- Score

      32. What defines best in class?

      <--- Score

      33. Has a team charter been developed and communicated?

      <--- Score

      34. Is the team adequately staffed with the desired cross-functionality? If not, what additional resources are available to the team?

      <--- Score

      35. Is there a completed, verified, and validated high-level ‘as is’ (not ‘should be’ or ‘could be’) stakeholder process map?

      <--- Score

      36. How do you think the partners involved in Environmental risk analysis would have defined success?

      <--- Score

      37. How will variation in the actual durations of each activity be dealt with to ensure that the expected Environmental risk analysis results are met?

      <--- Score

      38. What are the requirements for audit information?

      <--- Score

      39. What are the record-keeping requirements of Environmental risk analysis activities?

      <--- Score

      40. Are all requirements met?

      <--- Score

      41. Has a project plan, Gantt chart, or similar been developed/completed?

      <--- Score

      42. Is there regularly 100% attendance at the team meetings? If not, have appointed substitutes attended to preserve cross-functionality and full representation?

      <--- Score

      43. Is data collected and displayed to better understand customer(s) critical needs and requirements.

      <--- Score

      44. Scope of sensitive information?

      <--- Score

      45. How would you define Environmental risk analysis leadership?

      <--- Score

      46. Does the team have regular meetings?

      <--- Score

      47. How can the value of Environmental risk analysis be defined?

      <--- Score

      48. What critical content must be communicated – who, what, when, where, and how?

      <--- Score

      49. How is the team tracking and documenting its work?

      <--- Score

      50. What Environmental risk analysis requirements should be gathered?

      <--- Score

      51. What are (control) requirements for Environmental risk analysis Information?

      <--- Score

      52. Have the customer needs been translated into specific, measurable requirements? How?

      <--- Score

      53. If substitutes have been appointed, have they been briefed on the Environmental risk analysis goals and received regular communications as to the progress to date?

      <--- Score

      54. Is the team equipped with available and reliable resources?

      <--- Score

      55. What is the scope of Environmental risk analysis?

      <--- Score

      56. Is there a completed SIPOC representation, describing the Suppliers, Inputs, Process, Outputs, and Customers?

      <--- Score

      57. What sources do you use to gather information for a Environmental risk analysis study?

      <--- Score

      58. How will the Environmental risk analysis team and the group measure complete success of Environmental risk analysis?

      <--- Score

      59. How do you gather the stories?

      <--- Score

      60. What key stakeholder process output measure(s) does Environmental risk analysis leverage and how?

      <--- Score

      61. Is special Environmental risk analysis user knowledge required?

      <--- Score

      62. What is the scope of the Environmental risk analysis effort?

      <---

Скачать книгу