LITMIR.BIZ

Скачать книгу

completion dates/times of each activity?

      <--- Score

      117. What would be the goal or target for a Vendor Management Software’s improvement team?

      <--- Score

      118. Has the Vendor Management Software work been fairly and/or equitably divided and delegated among team members who are qualified and capable to perform the work? Has everyone contributed?

      <--- Score

      119. Is there a completed, verified, and validated high-level ‘as is’ (not ‘should be’ or ‘could be’) stakeholder process map?

      <--- Score

      120. Are there any constraints known that bear on the ability to perform Vendor Management Software work? How is the team addressing them?

      <--- Score

      121. Is there regularly 100% attendance at the team meetings? If not, have appointed substitutes attended to preserve cross-functionality and full representation?

      <--- Score

      122. How do you manage changes in Vendor Management Software requirements?

      <--- Score

      123. What is the context?

      <--- Score

      124. Are the Vendor Management Software requirements testable?

      <--- Score

      125. How would you define the culture at your organization, how susceptible is it to Vendor Management Software changes?

      <--- Score

      126. What baselines are required to be defined and managed?

      <--- Score

      127. Have the customer needs been translated into specific, measurable requirements? How?

      <--- Score

      128. Are accountability and ownership for Vendor Management Software clearly defined?

      <--- Score

      129. Does the team have regular meetings?

      <--- Score

      130. What knowledge or experience is required?

      <--- Score

      131. Have all of the relationships been defined properly?

      <--- Score

      132. Do you have a Vendor Management Software success story or case study ready to tell and share?

      <--- Score

      133. Has anyone else (internal or external to the group) attempted to solve this problem or a similar one before? If so, what knowledge can be leveraged from these previous efforts?

      <--- Score

      134. Is the team adequately staffed with the desired cross-functionality? If not, what additional resources are available to the team?

      <--- Score

      135. Are the Vendor Management Software requirements complete?

      <--- Score

      136. The political context: who holds power?

      <--- Score

      137. Is there a completed SIPOC representation, describing the Suppliers, Inputs, Process, Outputs, and Customers?

      <--- Score

      Add up total points for this section: _____ = Total points for this section

      Divided by: ______ (number of statements answered) = ______ Average score for this section

      Transfer your score to the Vendor Management Software Index at the beginning of the Self-Assessment.

      CRITERION #3: MEASURE:

      INTENT: Gather the correct data. Measure the current performance and evolution of the situation.

      In my belief, the answer to this question is clearly defined:

      5 Strongly Agree

      4 Agree

      3 Neutral

      2 Disagree

      1 Strongly Disagree

      1. What does your operating model cost?

      <--- Score

      2. The approach of traditional Vendor Management Software works for detail complexity but is focused on a systematic approach rather than an understanding of the nature of systems themselves, what approach will permit your organization to deal with the kind of unpredictable emergent behaviors that dynamic complexity can introduce?

      <--- Score

      3. Are you taking your company in the direction of better and revenue or cheaper and cost?

      <--- Score

      4. Did you tackle the cause or the symptom?

      <--- Score

      5. Do you have an issue in getting priority?

      <--- Score

      6. What are the Vendor Management Software investment costs?

      <--- Score

      7. How do you verify the Vendor Management Software requirements quality?

      <--- Score

      8. Have you made assumptions about the shape of the future, particularly its impact on your customers and competitors?

      <--- Score

      9. What users will be impacted?

      <--- Score

      10. How do you control the overall costs of your work processes?

      <--- Score

      11. Do you aggressively reward and promote the people who have the biggest impact on creating excellent Vendor Management Software services/products?

      <--- Score

      12. What is the cost of rework?

      <--- Score

      13. Does management have the right priorities among projects?

      <--- Score

      14. Why do you expend time and effort to implement measurement, for whom?

      <--- Score

      15. What is the root cause(s) of the problem?

      <--- Score

      16. How do you measure variability?

      <--- Score

      17. Is there an opportunity to verify requirements?

      <--- Score

      18. How is the value delivered by Vendor Management Software being measured?

      <--- Score

      19. What methods are feasible and acceptable to estimate the impact of reforms?

      <--- Score

      20. Among the Vendor Management Software product and service cost to be estimated, which is considered hardest to estimate?

      <--- Score

      21. What are predictive Vendor Management Software analytics?

      <--- Score

      22. How will you measure success?

      <--- Score

      23. What measurements are possible, practicable and meaningful?

      <--- Score

      24. What does losing customers cost your organization?

      <--- Score

      25. What is an unallowable cost?

Скачать книгу