ТОП просматриваемых книг сайта:
The Invention of the Jewish People. Shlomo Sand
Читать онлайн.Название The Invention of the Jewish People
Год выпуска 0
isbn 9781781683620
Автор произведения Shlomo Sand
Издательство Ingram
A Protonationalist View from the East
An Ethnicist Stage in the West
The First Steps of Historiography in Zion
The Earth Rebels against Mythistory
3. THE INVENTION OF THE EXILE: PROSELYTISM AND CONVERSION
Exile without Expulsion—History in the Twilight Zone
Against Its Will, the People Emigrate from the Homeland
“All Nations Shall Flow Unto It”
The Hasmoneans Impose Judaism on Their Neighbors
From Hellenistic Sphere to Mesopotamian Territory
Judaizing in the Shadow of Rome
How Rabbinical Judaism Viewed Proselytizing
Remembering and Forgetting the “People of the Land”
4. REALMS OF SILENCE: IN SEARCH OF LOST (JEWISH) TIME
Arabia Felix: The Proselytized Kingdom of Himyar
Phoenicians and Berbers: The Mysterious Queen Kahina
Jewish Kagans? A Strange Empire Rises in the East
Khazars and Judaism: A Long Love Affair?
Modern Research Explores the Khazar Past
The Enigma: The Origin of Eastern Europe’s Jews
5. THE DISTINCTION: IDENTITY POLITICS IN ISRAEL
The Scientific Puppet and the Racist Hunchback
“Jewish and Democratic”—An Oxymoron?
Ethnocracy in the Age of Globalization
Preface to the English-Language Edition
This book was originally written in Hebrew. My mother tongue is actually Yiddish, but Hebrew has remained the language of my imagination, probably of my dreams and certainly of my writing. I chose to publish the book in Israel because initially my intended readers were Israelis, both those who see themselves as Jews and those who are defined as Arabs. My reason was simple enough: I live in Tel Aviv, where I teach history.
When the book first appeared in early 2008, its reception was somewhat odd. The electronic media were intensely curious, and I was invited to take part in many television and radio programs. Journalists, too, turned their attention to my study, mostly in a favorable way. By contrast, representatives of the “authorized” body of historians fell on the book with academic fury, and excitable bloggers depicted me as an enemy of the people. Perhaps it was this contrast that prompted the readers to indulge me—the book stayed on the bestseller list for nineteen weeks.
To understand this development, you have to take a clear-eyed look at Israel and forgo any bias for or against. I live in a rather strange society. As the closing chapter of the book shows—to the annoyance of many book reviewers—Israel cannot be described as a democratic state while it sees itself as the state of the “Jewish people,” rather than as a body representing all the citizens within its recognized boundaries (not including the occupied territories). The spirit of Israel’s laws indicates that, at the start of the twenty-first century, the state’s objective is to serve Jews rather than Israelis, and to provide the best conditions for the supposed descendants of this ethnos rather than for all the citizens who live in it and speak its language. In fact, anyone born to a Jewish mother may have the best of both worlds—being free to live in London or in New York, confident that the State of Israel is theirs, even if they do not wish to live under its sovereignty. Yet anyone who did not emerge from Jewish loins and who lives in Jaffa or in Nazareth will feel that the state in which they were born will never be theirs.
Yet there is a rare kind of liberal pluralism in Israel, which weakens in times of war but functions quite well in peacetime. So far it has been possible in Israel to express a range of political opinions at literary events, to have Arab parties take part in parliamentary elections (provided they do not question the Jewish nature of the state), and to criticize the elected authorities. Certain liberal freedoms—such as freedom of the press, of expression and of association—have been protected, and the public arena is both variegated and secure. That is why it was possible to publish this book, and why its reception in 2008 was lively and aroused genuine debate.
Furthermore, the tight grip of the national myths has long been loosened. A younger generation of journalists and critics no longer echoes its parents’ collectivist ethos, and searches for the social models cultivated in London and New York. Globalization has sunk its aggressive talons into the cultural arenas even of Israel and has, in the process, undermined the legends that nurtured the “builders’