Скачать книгу

ENSURING PROFESSIONAL FIDELITY

       Professional Development

       Preparation and Sustainability

       Conclusion

       Parameters for Professional Development

       EPILOGUE

       EMBRACING RTI

       REFERENCES AND RESOURCES

       INDEX

      ABOUT THE AUTHOR

      Toby J. Karten, a staff developer, instructional coach, educational consultant, author, and inclusion specialist, has taught learners ranging from preschool to graduate school. She is an adjunct professor with Monmouth University, College of New Jersey, and La Salle University. In addition, Toby has designed online courses and professional development units for pre-service and practicing educators and related staff for the Regional Training Center in Randolph, New Jersey, and online platforms across the United States.

      She has collaborated with administrators, staff, students, and their families to ensure that students are educated in their least restrictive environments, looking at inclusive placements as the first option of service with the specially designed interventions in place.

      Throughout her professional career, Toby has helped staff translate research into practical applications for preK–12 classrooms. She has spoken with and coached administrators, staff, students, and their families at local, national, and international school sites and educational conferences. Toby’s ongoing professional goal is to help learners to achieve successful inclusion experiences in schools and ultimately, in life.

      The Council for Exceptional Children and the New Jersey Department of Education recognized Toby as an exemplary educator, giving her two Teacher of the Year awards. She earned a bachelor of arts degree in special education from Brooklyn College, a master of science degree in special education from the College of Staten Island, a supervisory degree from Georgian Court University, and an honorary doctorate degree from Gratz College.

      To learn more about Toby’s work, visit her website at www.inclusionworkshops.com and follow @TJK2INCLUDE on Twitter.

      To book Toby J. Karten for professional development, contact [email protected].

      INTRODUCTION

      Before we arrive at a destination, we need to make a few decisions about our journey. We might know where we want to go, but first we need to accurately analyze the facts. Analysis takes into account the starting point, travel options, and time parameters. For example, one may be able to walk or board a train, bus, plane, or car to get to a given city. However, some modes of transportation are preferable over others; each choice has both benefits and disadvantages. If there is traffic on a road, then traversing on foot for five blocks is quicker than sitting in bumper-to-bumper traffic in a taxi. I often print a map, use a phone app, consult a friend, or look for directions online. Navigation requires planning, knowledge, step-by-step procedures, resources, collaboration, and then, after arrival, a review on whether the travel choice was a good one.

      We might know where we want to go, but first we need to accurately analyze the facts.

      Schools are faced with similar decisions as they navigate their curriculum to assist or accompany their diverse learners to safely and happily arrive at their learning destinations. As an educator, instructional coach, and author, my goal for writing this book is to offer evidence-based “travel options” that will ease teachers’ pedagogical journey for schools and their classrooms.

      Teachers can use instructional tiers to help students who do not begin their journey at the same starting points. Diversity mandates that instructional decisions respond to multiple learner levels; this assists teachers in determining the best teaching approaches to reach each student. Ultimately, teachers must consider that learners are often at different levels of content mastery, even if they’re in the same classroom. The response to intervention (RTI) approach addresses these levels.

      RTI is a multitiered system of supports (MTSS) that offers diverse routes and step-by-step approaches such as differentiated instruction and universal design for learning (UDL) to help learners achieve mastery. RTI and MTSS are not separate ideas or concepts but partners that value how the core instruction is delivered to learners. Multitiered instruction is basically an instructional interaction. It is how teachers deliver the core instruction to students who learn differently. If teachers introduce, remediate, and enrich student levels with the whole class, small groups, and individuals, then they can effectively address student diversity.

      RTI is often delivered in three tiers, as shown in figure I.1.

      Source: Buffum, Mattos, & Weber, 2012.

       Figure I.1: The traditional RTI pyramid.

      According to Austin Buffum, Mike Mattos, and Chris Weber (2012):

      The pyramid shape is wide at the bottom to represent the basic instruction that all students receive. As students demonstrate the need for additional support, they move up the pyramid, receiving increasingly more targeted and intensive help. Fewer students should need the services offered at the upper levels, thus creating the tapered shape of a pyramid. The pyramid is also traditionally separated into tiers, with Tier I representing gradelevel core instruction, Tier 2 supplemental interventions, and Tier 3 intensive student support. (p. 11)

      Tier 1 instruction is for the whole class or small groups; not all learners master the learning initially. Tier 2 intervention provides supplemental instruction in small groups, as needed; and Tier 3 intervention provides instruction for individual students who require additional scaffolding and practice. To further reinforce this concept, Buffum and colleagues (2012) provide an inverted pyramid, which focuses on “a school’s collective attention and resources to a single point: the individual child” (p. 11). The foundation for RTI is that schools should not delay helping struggling students until they fall so far behind that they then qualify for special education, but instead “should provide timely, targeted, systematic interventions to all students who demonstrate the need” (p. xiii). See figure I.2.

      Source: Buffum et al., 2012.

       Figure I.2: The inverted RTI pyramid.

      They contend that the pyramid “should be wide at the top to represent access to the core gradelevel curriculum that all students deserve and need” (p. 11). This initial core instruction should meet the needs of most students and embrace differentiation. However, beyond initial instruction, some students may need more focused, targeted instruction, and the school should respond by individually attending to the needs of each of these students.

      Instruction can address oral expression, listening comprehension, early literacy skills, reading fluency, reading comprehension, vocabulary development, written

Скачать книгу