Скачать книгу

the long-term volunteers, William (Bill) Gardner and James (Jim) Mueller worked on Schmidt’s burial data; Bill deciphered Schmidt’s original handwritten burial sheets and then inventoried and organized the large assemblage of burial groups into spreadsheets. This arduous process also revealed unpublished notes by Schmidt. Jim did statistical work on burials, so that more precise descriptions of the context of grave objects and burial rituals could be reconstructed. I am grateful to them.

      My thanks go to Dr. William Fitts, then-researcher at the Penn Museum, and David Massey, then a graduate student at Ohio State University, for the initial drafting of the GIS maps that were later revised by Ayşem Kılınç Ünlü and Joseph Torres, both graduate students at Penn School of Design. Invaluable technical support was given by two professionals and close friends. James Rowland helped with preparing the manuscript according to the publication guidelines and Jason Francisco, a documentary photographer, took additional photographs of objects. Katherine Blanchard, keeper of the Near East collection, kindly brought the objects from storage so they could be photographed.

      I also appreciate the timely and thought-provoking comments and suggestions by the two anonymous reviewers.

      To my husband Laurence I express my gratitude for his continued patience and support. Now I can finally say to him, “The Tepe Hissar manuscript is finished,” in response to his intermittent queries, “when will it be completed?”

      To my daughter Han who patiently helped me with German translations of articles and, as a talented illustrator and architect, drafted the line drawing of the iconic gold “mouflon” imprinted on the hard cover, which is considered a symbol of sustenance, fertility, and sacred power in ancient Southwest Asia.

      Last but not least, my gratitude goes to Erich F. Schmidt, an archaeologist who was trained as an anthropologist under Franz Boas in late 1920s. He undertook a most intellectually and politically challenging project in northern Iran, which, at that time, was an archaeological “terra incognita.” Schmidt’s systematic and untiring work at Tepe Hissar, which lasted 10 months over two field seasons, revealed a major Bronze Age settlement on the crossroads of southwestern Asia and also brought up many questions, which were addressed forty-five years later by Dyson and, after three more decades, by this author, in light of new excavation data from Tepe Hissar and other sites in Iran and Central Asia.

      Major funding for the Tepe Hissar Publication Project came from The Shelby White and Leon Levy Program for Archaeological Publications. I received additional funding from the University of Pennsylvania Museum Research Fund; the American Institute of Iranian Studies paid for my trip to the Damghan Conference; and Erika Schmidt kindly responded to my request for additional funds for illustrations, in memory of her father’s excavation at Tepe Hissar. To all I extend my heartfelt thanks.

      Tepe Hissar, an Introduction

      Tepe Hissar was one of the first systematically excavated Bronze Age settlements in the northern Iranian plateau. Two cycles of excavation were undertaken at the site by the University of Pennsylvania Museum of Archaeology and Anthropology (hereafter Penn Museum). In June 1931, the Penn Museum launched its first archaeological expedition to Iran—then Persia—at Tepe Hissar and the monumental Sassanian palace, near the town of Damghan. Erich Schmidt was appointed to direct the project, which lasted until the end of 1932.1 Almost five decades later, in 1976, another expedition was initiated at Tepe Hissar by the Penn Museum under Robert H. Dyson Jr.,2 in collaboration with Maurizio Tosi of the University of Turin, and with the support of the Iranian Center for Archaeological Research in Tehran.

      Both cycles of excavation resulted in publications (Schmidt 1931, 1937; Dyson and Howard 1989). While Schmidt’s excavations established the historical framework, Dyson and his team presented a stratigraphically clearer sequence for the site with associated radiocarbon dates. Nevertheless, a full study of the ceramic assemblages has not been published to date. In this publication, the new ceramic sequence from the Tepe Hissar settlement is established and linked to the grave assemblages, which should provide ample evidence for the chronology of the site, the nature of the progression and the abandonment of the settlement, and its chronological correlations on the northern Iranian plateau.

      A. Site Location and Description

      The site of Tepe Hissar (“Castle Hill”) is located on the Iranian Plateau, to the southeast of the Caspian Sea (36° 09’ N, 59° 22’ E), about 1.5 km from the modern city of Damghan (Fig. 0.1). It is situated along the historic east-west trade route between Tehran and Meshed. To its north are the majestic Elburz Mountains that provide the main source of water to the Cheshmeh Ali (Eye of Ali) spring, drained by the Damghan River (Fig. 0.2). To the south are the fringes of the Central Iranian Salt Desert (Dasht-i Kavir).

      The site’s favorable location must have facilitated the movement of prehistoric inhabitants and provided them with a wide range of natural resources, as evidenced by geomorphological and ecological studies (Meder 1989:7–12). Thus, in terms of subsistence strategy, the ancient populations of Tepe Hissar were able to exploit resources from the desert (kavir) to the Elburz range3 and, perhaps, from the Caspian coastal zone which is about 100 km over the mountain range. Diet would have been varied, for “natural resources are distributed around the [Damghan] basin. Equidistant from Tappeh Hesar are the high valley to the north, rich in flint, lead, wood, fruit, deer, stag, boar, fish and fowl and the arid periphery of the kavir to the south with its known occurrences of copper, gold, turquoise and semi-arid fauna with herds of gazelles and onagers” (Dyson and Tosi 1989:6).

      While the principal sustenance of the ancient population derived from different species of domesticated wheat, barley, and lentils, this was combined with a Mediterranean type diet that included wild grape and olive plant foods (Costantini and Dyson 1990).4 The diet was supplemented by meat mostly from caprines and cattle. The exploitation of aquatic resources is attested to by fish bones excavated during 1976. Mashkour’s references to the presence of onager (Equus hemionus) and “some cattle principally kept for traction,” indicate uses of onager in herding and distance travel and cattle in plowing.5

      Rising six to eight meters above the surrounding plain, Tepe Hissar comprises seven disconnected mounds and flat settlements. As of the mid-1970s (Fig. 0.3), it measured about 600 meters in diameter; roughly 12 hectares of visible mounded occupational remains were partly buried in the alluvial fan of the Damghan River (Meder 1989).

Image

      Over time, the ancient populations at Tepe Hissar moved around within the settlement complex—possibly for agricultural reasons or for proximity to water resources—leaving behind an abandoned area that subsequently became used as an intramural cemetery until the beginning of another occupation in the same area. Therefore, during each phase of the settlement, part of the mounded area was residential and part of the flat area was burial ground.

      In 1976, Dyson and his team attributed the general destruction of the site and its environs to long-term erosion and the result of marginal cultivation, as seen from a 1940s Schmidt aerial photo. They also noted some of the ancient sites shown on Schmidt’s map (1933: pl. LXXVI) were most likely ploughed away by the fields surrounding modern villages. Clearly, since the 1970s, the process of destruction has continued under mechanically ploughed irrigated fields6 and with the railway cutting through the site (Dyson and Tosi 1989:6) (Fig. 0.4). Nevertheless, Dyson (pers. comm.) was surprised to find relatively good state of preservation of some of Schmidt’s trenches despite the passing of nearly five decades.

      B. Research History

      A summary of the research history at Tepe Hissar is a key component of this study

Скачать книгу