Скачать книгу

of Peacekeeping OperationsDROPSDemountable rack offload and pickup systemsEECEuropean Economic CommunityESDPEuropean Security and Defence PolicyEUFOREuropean Union Force in Chad and Central African RepublicEULEXEuropean Rule of Law Mission (Kosovo)FHQForce HeadquartersFLNFront de Libération NationaleFMRForce Mobile ReserveFNFabrique Nationale (Belgian Arms Manufacturer)FOOForward Observation OfficerGPMGGeneral purpose machine gunHMGHeavy machine gunHQHeadquartersIDFIsraeli Defence ForceIrish BattIrish BattalionIDPInternally Displaced Person (a displaced person who moves but does not cross a border)IUNVAIrish United Nations Veterans AssociationJAMBOKatangese GendarmerieJEMJustice and Equality MovementJOCJoint Operations CentreKFORKosovo ForceLAUISLocals armed and uniformed by the Israelis (a pro-Israeli militia)LPListening PostMEDEVACMedical EvacuationMIAMissing in ActionMINURCATUnited Nations Mission in Central African Republic and ChadMFCMobile Fire ControllerMREMission readiness exerciseMOUMemorandum of UnderstandingNATONorth Atlantic Treaty OrganisationNCONon-commissioned Officer (Corporals and Sergeants mostly)NGONon-governmental organisationOCOfficer CommandingOHQOperational Headquarters (link between Military Strategic and Force Headquarters)ONUCOperations des Nations Unies au Congo (United Nations Operation in Congo)OPObservation PostOP CMDROperational CommanderPfPPartnership for Peace (an arrangement whereby non-NATO members may participate with NATO members on certain peacekeeping missions)PLOPalestinian Liberation OrganisationRCORaising and Concentration OrderRecceReconnaissanceRE-ORGReorganisation location for attackers having secured an objectiveSASESafe and Secure EnvironmentSLASouth Lebanese Army (a pro-Israeli militia)SLA/MSudan Liberation Army/MovementSOFAStatus of Forces AgreementSPODSea Port of DisembarkationSRVSpecial Reconnaissance VehicleSRAAWShort Range Anti-Armour WeaponTATechnical AgreementUNAMIDUnited Nations African Mission in DarfurUNDOFUnited Nations Disengagement Observation ForceUNHCRUnited Nations High Commission for RefugeesUNIFILUnited Nations Interim Force in LebanonUNIFYCYPUnited Nations Peacekeeping Force in CyprusUNMIKUnited Nations Mission in KosovoUNTSIUnited Nations Training School Ireland (Military College, Curragh Camp, Co. Kildare, Ireland)UNTSO OGLUnited Nations Truce Supervision Organisation, Observer Group Lebanon

      Foreword

      No one ever became a soldier in order to be a full-time peacekeeper. A soldier is a warrior, whose primary skill is in the taking of life. To do that efficiently he must obey orders and accept the hierarchy that administers them. These ingredients – the ability to deliver lethal force and a culture of command and submission – enable armies to have other functions that are beyond the scope of most civilian organisations. One of these is peacekeeping, but this is a secondary role and it is one of the misfortunes of the Army of the Republic that this secondary duty is now widely perceived as its primary function.

      It most emphatically is not. Those who wear the uniform of the Republic are its true embodiment. They are its soldiers, who accept the lawful commands of the state in its protection and in its service. Whereas An Garda Siochána serves the citizens and enforces the law, the Army defends the Republic – in both the military sense and in the civic sphere – especially in times of emergency. But what underwrites and enables these duties is the ability and willingness of the soldiers of the Republic to take life in its service, and to place their own in harm’s way.

      Many men and women like danger. The truth is that large numbers of Irishmen, in the service of many states, have always courted death. This is one reason why Irishmen make great soldiers. But it is the willingness to obey and to use disciplined violence that transforms what might otherwise be a thrill-seeking rabble into an army. And an army is only an army when its members enter a contract that is predicated on killing, and its associated skills.

      The many peacekeeping missions that our Army has undertaken for nigh-on sixty years have usually been free of the situations that invoke the killing contract. But that is in large part because armed locals who might otherwise be tempted to use force are usually in no doubt about the consequences if they do. In the absence of violence, a good army will display its martial skills in surrogate but very visible ways: vigilance, discipline, obedience and an easy confidence in the bearing of firearms. These are the vital signals that prevent an armed but passive witness from becoming an active player.

      When these messages fail to communicate their underlying purpose, or are ignored, the peacekeeper must revert to his primary duty, the one he or she, by nature, likes best; that of being a soldier whose safety catch is off, looking for a target. When this happens, the enemy will see a quite different soldier from the affable, smiling person who was so obliging at roadblocks and who helped administer the TB jab. This character will, if need be, kill you.

      Peacekeepers are not social workers with guns, through whom the local militia would drive with scorn. They can only keep the peace because they can also end it. Dan Harvey has written this fascinating description of when Irish peacekeeping efforts – for whatever reason – no longer kept the peace, and so it was time for fighting. No one joins the Defence Forces without hoping for something like this. Why? Because, at bottom, it’s something that Irish soldiers are good at. Excellent at minding the peace, and just as good at concluding the ambitions and even the heartbeat of those who want to end it.

      Kevin Myers, January 2017

      INTRODUCTION

      A New Departure

      The Irish Defence Forces’ involvement in overseas peacekeeping service was to prove the single biggest development in their history. It was also to involve its members in a number of significant critical moments, when Irish soldiers as peacekeepers, inserted into volatile and violent, often difficult, dangerous and deteriorating situations, walked the very fine line between peacekeeping and war-fighting, the need to return fire and otherwise using measured force as a last resort in self-defence.

      Peacekeepers are often asked to do what politics and diplomacy have not done. Partisan, belligerent protagonists have often been part of the reality faced by Irish peacekeepers in an array of highly varied and intricate mission areas. Irish Peacekeepers, using patience, persistence, impartiality and professionalism have addressed the effects of complicity, complexity, crisis and conflict. Despite some setbacks, problems and difficulties, peacekeeping works and the Irish are good at it. On occasion, the Irish Defence Forces, with nearly 60 years participation as peacekeepers, 85,000 individual tours of duty in over 70 United Nations (UN) or UN-approved missions, and 86 Defence Force members paying the ultimate price, have experienced circumstances when a demonstration of resolve became necessary. Ireland is one of the most consistent European contributors to the UN and is one of the most successful contributors to UN-mandated Peace Support Operations. They are well regarded by those with whom they operate and the various peoples of the mission areas in which they have found themselves. Today it is taken for granted that Irish soldiers should serve alongside those of other nations in UN peacekeeping missions worldwide, yet when first requested to do so it was an entirely ‘New Departure’ and Ireland moved into the mainstream of then current world events.

      What

Скачать книгу