LITMIR.BIZ

Скачать книгу

Neutral

      2 Disagree

      1 Strongly Disagree

      1. If substitutes have been appointed, have they been briefed on the Project management application goals and received regular communications as to the progress to date?

      <--- Score

      2. Is the Project management application scope complete and appropriately sized?

      <--- Score

      3. What would be the goal or target for a Project management application’s improvement team?

      <--- Score

      4. Has a high-level ‘as is’ process map been completed, verified and validated?

      <--- Score

      5. Is the team adequately staffed with the desired cross-functionality? If not, what additional resources are available to the team?

      <--- Score

      6. Is Project management application required?

      <--- Score

      7. Has everyone on the team, including the team leaders, been properly trained?

      <--- Score

      8. When are meeting minutes sent out? Who is on the distribution list?

      <--- Score

      9. How is the team tracking and documenting its work?

      <--- Score

      10. What is the scope of the Project management application effort?

      <--- Score

      11. Are accountability and ownership for Project management application clearly defined?

      <--- Score

      12. Is the scope of Project management application defined?

      <--- Score

      13. Is the team equipped with available and reliable resources?

      <--- Score

      14. Are there any constraints known that bear on the ability to perform Project management application work? How is the team addressing them?

      <--- Score

      15. Is the current ‘as is’ process being followed? If not, what are the discrepancies?

      <--- Score

      16. How do you gather requirements?

      <--- Score

      17. Has the direction changed at all during the course of Project management application? If so, when did it change and why?

      <--- Score

      18. Is scope creep really all bad news?

      <--- Score

      19. Is Project management application linked to key stakeholder goals and objectives?

      <--- Score

      20. What is out-of-scope initially?

      <--- Score

      21. How do you catch Project management application definition inconsistencies?

      <--- Score

      22. What is the worst case scenario?

      <--- Score

      23. Is there a Project management application management charter, including stakeholder case, problem and goal statements, scope, milestones, roles and responsibilities, communication plan?

      <--- Score

      24. Are all requirements met?

      <--- Score

      25. Do the problem and goal statements meet the SMART criteria (specific, measurable, attainable, relevant, and time-bound)?

      <--- Score

      26. Has a Project management application requirement not been met?

      <--- Score

      27. Are customer(s) identified and segmented according to their different needs and requirements?

      <--- Score

      28. Scope of sensitive information?

      <--- Score

      29. Has your scope been defined?

      <--- Score

      30. What are the Roles and Responsibilities for each team member and its leadership? Where is this documented?

      <--- Score

      31. Who are the Project management application improvement team members, including Management Leads and Coaches?

      <--- Score

      32. Are different versions of process maps needed to account for the different types of inputs?

      <--- Score

      33. Is data collected and displayed to better understand customer(s) critical needs and requirements.

      <--- Score

      34. What defines best in class?

      <--- Score

      35. What system do you use for gathering Project management application information?

      <--- Score

      36. Are the Project management application requirements testable?

      <--- Score

      37. How do you manage changes in Project management application requirements?

      <--- Score

      38. Is there a critical path to deliver Project management application results?

      <--- Score

      39. Is it clearly defined in and to your organization what you do?

      <--- Score

      40. What critical content must be communicated – who, what, when, where, and how?

      <--- Score

      41. What baselines are required to be defined and managed?

      <--- Score

      42. Is the Project management application scope manageable?

      <--- Score

      43. What are the Project management application tasks and definitions?

      <--- Score

      44. Has the improvement team collected the ‘voice of the customer’ (obtained feedback – qualitative and quantitative)?

      <--- Score

      45. Are required metrics defined, what are they?

      <--- Score

      46. Who is gathering Project management application information?

      <--- Score

      47. Who defines (or who defined) the rules and roles?

      <--- Score

      48. How does the Project management application manager ensure against scope creep?

      <--- Score

      49. When is/was the Project management application start date?

      <--- Score

      50. Has/have the customer(s) been identified?

      <--- Score

      51. What are the dynamics of the communication plan?

      <--- Score

      52. Have specific policy objectives been defined?

      <--- Score

      53. When is the estimated completion date?

      <--- Score

      54.

Скачать книгу