LITMIR.BIZ

Скачать книгу

How often are the team meetings?

      <--- Score

      14. Is the team adequately staffed with the desired cross-functionality? If not, what additional resources are available to the team?

      <--- Score

      15. What baselines are required to be defined and managed?

      <--- Score

      16. Who defines (or who defined) the rules and roles?

      <--- Score

      17. Do you have a Training analysis success story or case study ready to tell and share?

      <--- Score

      18. Do you have organizational privacy requirements?

      <--- Score

      19. How is the team tracking and documenting its work?

      <--- Score

      20. What constraints exist that might impact the team?

      <--- Score

      21. Are approval levels defined for contracts and supplements to contracts?

      <--- Score

      22. Are required metrics defined, what are they?

      <--- Score

      23. How do you gather requirements?

      <--- Score

      24. Has the improvement team collected the ‘voice of the customer’ (obtained feedback – qualitative and quantitative)?

      <--- Score

      25. When is the estimated completion date?

      <--- Score

      26. How will variation in the actual durations of each activity be dealt with to ensure that the expected Training analysis results are met?

      <--- Score

      27. In what way can you redefine the criteria of choice clients have in your category in your favor?

      <--- Score

      28. Is there a completed SIPOC representation, describing the Suppliers, Inputs, Process, Outputs, and Customers?

      <--- Score

      29. Who approved the Training analysis scope?

      <--- Score

      30. Are resources adequate for the scope?

      <--- Score

      31. What are the Training analysis tasks and definitions?

      <--- Score

      32. Does the team have regular meetings?

      <--- Score

      33. How did the Training analysis manager receive input to the development of a Training analysis improvement plan and the estimated completion dates/times of each activity?

      <--- Score

      34. What is in the scope and what is not in scope?

      <--- Score

      35. What are the dynamics of the communication plan?

      <--- Score

      36. What system do you use for gathering Training analysis information?

      <--- Score

      37. What sources do you use to gather information for a Training analysis study?

      <--- Score

      38. How does the Training analysis manager ensure against scope creep?

      <--- Score

      39. When are meeting minutes sent out? Who is on the distribution list?

      <--- Score

      40. What is the scope of Training analysis?

      <--- Score

      41. What is the worst case scenario?

      <--- Score

      42. Are task requirements clearly defined?

      <--- Score

      43. What is the scope of the Training analysis work?

      <--- Score

      44. How do you hand over Training analysis context?

      <--- Score

      45. How do you keep key subject matter experts in the loop?

      <--- Score

      46. Is Training analysis required?

      <--- Score

      47. Is there a critical path to deliver Training analysis results?

      <--- Score

      48. How and when will the baselines be defined?

      <--- Score

      49. What Training analysis requirements should be gathered?

      <--- Score

      50. What is the definition of Training analysis excellence?

      <--- Score

      51. Is Training analysis currently on schedule according to the plan?

      <--- Score

      52. How can the value of Training analysis be defined?

      <--- Score

      53. Is there a completed, verified, and validated high-level ‘as is’ (not ‘should be’ or ‘could be’) stakeholder process map?

      <--- Score

      54. What critical content must be communicated – who, what, when, where, and how?

      <--- Score

      55. Has a high-level ‘as is’ process map been completed, verified and validated?

      <--- Score

      56. How do you think the partners involved in Training analysis would have defined success?

      <--- Score

      57. What are the compelling stakeholder reasons for embarking on Training analysis?

      <--- Score

      58. Scope of sensitive information?

      <--- Score

      59. What are the requirements for audit information?

      <--- Score

      60. What is out of scope?

      <--- Score

      61. What defines best in class?

      <--- Score

      62. Has the Training analysis work been fairly and/or equitably divided and delegated among team members who are qualified and capable to perform the work? Has everyone contributed?

      <--- Score

      63. What key stakeholder process output measure(s) does Training analysis leverage and how?

      <--- Score

      64. What is the context?

      <--- Score

      65. How do you manage scope?

      <--- Score

      66. Is there a clear Training analysis case definition?

      <--- Score

      67. Is the current ‘as is’ process being followed? If not, what are the discrepancies?

      <--- Score

      68. Is there any additional Training analysis definition of success?

      <--- Score

      69. If substitutes have been appointed, have they been briefed on the Training analysis

Скачать книгу