LITMIR.BIZ

Скачать книгу

information privacy leverage and how?

      <--- Score

      58. When is the estimated completion date?

      <--- Score

      59. Has the direction changed at all during the course of Health care information privacy? If so, when did it change and why?

      <--- Score

      60. What information do you gather?

      <--- Score

      61. Are audit criteria, scope, frequency and methods defined?

      <--- Score

      62. How would you define the culture at your organization, how susceptible is it to Health care information privacy changes?

      <--- Score

      63. How will variation in the actual durations of each activity be dealt with to ensure that the expected Health care information privacy results are met?

      <--- Score

      64. How did the Health care information privacy manager receive input to the development of a Health care information privacy improvement plan and the estimated completion dates/times of each activity?

      <--- Score

      65. Is there a completed SIPOC representation, describing the Suppliers, Inputs, Process, Outputs, and Customers?

      <--- Score

      66. What are the Health care information privacy use cases?

      <--- Score

      67. What are the dynamics of the communication plan?

      <--- Score

      68. Is scope creep really all bad news?

      <--- Score

      69. How would you define Health care information privacy leadership?

      <--- Score

      70. What intelligence can you gather?

      <--- Score

      71. Is there a critical path to deliver Health care information privacy results?

      <--- Score

      72. How and when will the baselines be defined?

      <--- Score

      73. Has a Health care information privacy requirement not been met?

      <--- Score

      74. What sort of initial information to gather?

      <--- Score

      75. Who defines (or who defined) the rules and roles?

      <--- Score

      76. Is the scope of Health care information privacy defined?

      <--- Score

      77. Will team members regularly document their Health care information privacy work?

      <--- Score

      78. What information should you gather?

      <--- Score

      79. How do you think the partners involved in Health care information privacy would have defined success?

      <--- Score

      80. Has the improvement team collected the ‘voice of the customer’ (obtained feedback – qualitative and quantitative)?

      <--- Score

      81. Are task requirements clearly defined?

      <--- Score

      82. What was the context?

      <--- Score

      83. Are there any constraints known that bear on the ability to perform Health care information privacy work? How is the team addressing them?

      <--- Score

      84. What is the scope?

      <--- Score

      85. Is there regularly 100% attendance at the team meetings? If not, have appointed substitutes attended to preserve cross-functionality and full representation?

      <--- Score

      86. Is full participation by members in regularly held team meetings guaranteed?

      <--- Score

      87. Do you have a Health care information privacy success story or case study ready to tell and share?

      <--- Score

      88. Is the team sponsored by a champion or stakeholder leader?

      <--- Score

      89. How do you manage scope?

      <--- Score

      90. How do you manage unclear Health care information privacy requirements?

      <--- Score

      91. What are the requirements for audit information?

      <--- Score

      92. What system do you use for gathering Health care information privacy information?

      <--- Score

      93. How have you defined all Health care information privacy requirements first?

      <--- Score

      94. How was the ‘as is’ process map developed, reviewed, verified and validated?

      <--- Score

      95. Are the Health care information privacy requirements complete?

      <--- Score

      96. What is in the scope and what is not in scope?

      <--- Score

      97. Are accountability and ownership for Health care information privacy clearly defined?

      <--- Score

      98. Have specific policy objectives been defined?

      <--- Score

      99. What is a worst-case scenario for losses?

      <--- Score

      100. Is Health care information privacy required?

      <--- Score

      101. How will the Health care information privacy team and the group measure complete success of Health care information privacy?

      <--- Score

      102. Have all basic functions of Health care information privacy been defined?

      <--- Score

      103. Do the problem and goal statements meet the SMART criteria (specific, measurable, attainable, relevant, and time-bound)?

      <--- Score

      104. Is the improvement team aware of the different versions of a process: what they think it is vs. what it actually is vs. what it should be vs. what it could be?

      <--- Score

      105. Does the team have regular meetings?

      <--- Score

      106. Is the work to date meeting requirements?

      <--- Score

      107. What is the context?

      <--- Score

      108. Has a high-level ‘as is’ process map been completed, verified and validated?

      <--- Score

      109. What happens if Health care information privacy’s scope changes?

      <--- Score

      110. How are consistent Health care information privacy definitions important?

      <--- Score

      111. Are approval

Скачать книгу