ТОП просматриваемых книг сайта:
Kenneth Clark: Life, Art and Civilisation. James Stourton
Читать онлайн.Название Kenneth Clark: Life, Art and Civilisation
Год выпуска 0
isbn 9780007493432
Автор произведения James Stourton
Жанр Биографии и Мемуары
Издательство HarperCollins
Soon after his arrival at I Tatti, Clark accompanied the Berensons with Nicky on a tour of Italian galleries. There were several adventures: in Milan he encountered Diaghilev; in Treviglio he was arrested for stealing a church treasure; in Brescia BB’s shawl was stolen and returned after a priestly appeal from the pulpit; and in Padua they were entertained, to BB’s pleasure, by ‘a very great lady’, the Countess Papafava. The local museums could be a trial, with their talkative curators and endless galleries of second-rate pictures. Clark probably sympathised with Mary’s frustration as BB spent hours poring over unattributable paintings of the late Middle Ages that added no value to their enterprise. However, the trip was aesthetically important for Clark. He began to glimpse BB’s early fascination with the unpredictable Lotto, and was awed by ‘the intolerable confidence of Titian’. But it was Giotto in Padua that made the most lasting impression. Confronted with the greatest storyteller in Italian art, Clark saw the pitiful limitations of ‘significant form’ and ‘tactile values’.* In Parma, looking at Correggio, Clark describes ‘another moment of vision which was to lie dormant in my imagination … a realisation of the ecstasy of martyrdom, which came to me before Correggio’s picture of S. Placidus and S. Flavia. It was the moment I became capable of writing the chapter on the Counter-Reformation in Civilisation.’14
Mary Berenson mysteriously left the party to disappear back to I Tatti. On their return the reason became apparent. She felt that the unpretentious architecture of I Tatti needed something more assertive, and had instructed Cecil Pinsent in BB’s absence to install a central clock on the garden façade. Berenson’s invariable reaction to Mary’s follies was to faint, take to his bed and demand their removal, but it was usually too late. Her elevated clock is still there, and much admired.
All the inhabitants of I Tatti were puzzled by Clark’s romantic life – or the seeming lack of it. Mary had hoped he might marry one of her granddaughters, BB that he would find a great lady in Florence, but the suspicion dawned on the household that they had misunderstood his proclivities, and that Clark was drawn to boys. Mary, with her usual naïve optimism, decided that he should move out of I Tatti to share a house with the obviously gay Cecil Pinsent. ‘Driven into a corner by this bizarre proposition,’ Clark relates that ‘I had no alternative but to come out with the truth, “Mary, I want to get married.”’15 This announcement, made in December, pleased nobody, as it would change the fragile dynamic of the I Tatti court. It was the end of the apprenticeship as the Berensons had conceived it, with Clark as the solicitous, ever-available bachelor.
Clark claims that after this conversation with Mary he wired Jane, asking her to marry him and proposing a date, 10 January 1927 – which suggests that they already had an understanding on the subject. She immediately wired back her acceptance. Mary, with her strong sense of family, set about finding a house that would be suitable for them when they returned together as a married couple. Clark wrote to John Sparrow announcing his arrival in England, but made no reference to the wedding. This was characteristic of his peculiar attitude to the event: ‘I shall be living at St Ermins for a few weeks trying to finish the Gothic Revival. Probably Jane will be living with me, but you must try not to mind that. I have a morbid dread of living alone out here.’16 He left I Tatti after Christmas, and all that BB said when he went to say goodbye was ‘I don’t mind.’ But he did, and he felt that Clark had betrayed him.
Clark had disengaged from C.F. Bell to work at I Tatti, and by marrying Jane he had taken the first step towards independence from Berenson. Although he came to have doubts about BB, Clark was always clear about his debt to him. He said it best in the Sunday Times piece he wrote on Berenson’s death: ‘His fear of pedantry made him unwilling to give the generations of young men who frequented I Tatti any sort of formal instruction. But I think we were his pupils: for at almost every meal, and on those unforgettable walks, our eyes were opened and our minds were filled. At first we might resent the hard knocks administered to local gods. But as we came to realise that neither Oxford nor Bloomsbury nor Cambridge Mass. had established the ultimate boundaries of civilisation, we found ourselves entering a larger inheritance. We were educated as few young men since the Renaissance … for we learned to think of civilised life as catholic and apostolic … and we came to believe that love of art is only a part of the love of life. I owe him more than I can say and probably much more than I know.’17
Clark’s wedding was one of the oddest events he ever described. After leaving I Tatti, instead of going home to see his fiancée or help with arrangements, he went to Rome. The closest he got to a stag night was his last dinner in Rome, in the company of Lytton Strachey, the orientalist Arthur Waley and his partner the dancer and critic Beryl de Zoete. He arrived in London on the eve of the wedding, organised by Jane’s mother, who had been supplied with his draconian instructions: no wedding dress, no bridesmaids, no reception and no church. He wanted the ceremony to take place in a register office, but Jane and her mother insisted on a church. It is perfectly possible that Clark had never actually been to a wedding before. The dismal event took place at St Peter’s church in Eaton Square. Clark gave as his occupation ‘art critic’, the one thing he had assured his father he would not become. His former travelling companion Leigh Ashton was best man, and the few guests – consisting mostly of Clark family servants – dispersed after the service. The bride and groom had lunch alone with his parents at the gloomy St Ermin’s Hotel.
Clark described the event to Mary Berenson: ‘We were married in a hideous church – not even Gothic Revival. But it only took fourteen minutes, so I can’t grumble. Everyone seemed satisfied except the pew opener who refused to believe that two such drab and youthful people could be bride and bridegroom. No organ, no champagne and only half-a-dozen handshakes: I call that a success.’18
Whatever was he doing? Clark claims that it was his mother’s Quakerish fear of ritual that overcame him, but why did Jane – who loved all the things he denied her on her wedding day – put up with this? There is no clear answer. Clark could certainly be selfish, as Mary Berenson divined, and Jane was probably still in awe of his family.
After a few days spent at the St Ermin’s flat (which his parents had given them as a wedding present) the newly married couple took the Florence section of the Rome Express to begin their new life.* Mary had arranged a home for them to rent at the Chiostro di San Martino, near I Tatti, which had a plaque in their bedroom to the effect that St Andrew the Scot had died there in 682. Adjoining the property was an attractive church in the manner of Brunelleschi. They inherited an experienced staff, and this would be the background to one of the happiest periods of their marriage. For Jane it was a time of learning about art under a natural teacher, and she entered her new world with the same gusto that she had displayed at Oxford.
But there was an alarming rite of passage to be faced, the thought of which made Clark feel ill: ‘less than a mile away loomed two ogres’ castles, I Tatti