LITMIR.BIZ

Скачать книгу

location faces significant difficulties due to the lack of modern transport infrastructure. The population of the republic is extremely unevenly located, which is concentrated, in fact, around the five main centers with the most favorable natural conditions and a developed social and industrial environment. The orientation towards the deep modernization of independent Turkmenistan in practice stated in the fundamental political documents is implemented in the context of the political tradition of the Eastern life structure society.

      It is the specified internal complexity, inconsistency of common (non-systemic) factors of Turkmenistan’s foreign policy that determines the qualitative specifics of the content of its objective prerequisites.

      The existence of an independent Turkmen state was already emphasized for the foreign policy of Turkmenistan. At the same time, it should be borne in mind that nowadays Turkmen statehood is taking, in fact, the first steps towards independent development.

      Today, Turkmenistan’s geopolitical position has changed dramatically. If earlier the republic was part of the global system, which in many ways “automatically” for the country determined its place in regional relations with other states (Iran, Afghanistan), now Turkmenistan has become the site of a clash of regional centers of power: Iran, Turkey, Kazakhstan, Uzbekistan. Each of these centers, not to mention Russia, joined the struggle for the predominant influence in the geopolitical and economic spaces of Turkmenistan, control over which will allow them to gain undoubted benefits.

      Having left the geopolitical super system of the former USSR, Turkmenistan found itself in the position of a closed, continental country. Only in the Caspian Sea can it freely communicate with its closest neighbors, in other cases, contacts with other states, and even more so with “far abroad,” largely turned out to be depending on the favor of third states. The problem of establishing, in fact, again the system of political and economic communication faced Turkmenistan in full growth. Indeed, even in order to benefit from the presence of large reserves of hydrocarbons, Turkmenistan is forced to seek the direct or indirect consent of its neighbors, who, in turn, pursue their own interests.

      Ensuring national security in the new conditions is also possible either on a multilateral basis, within the CIS, or independently, and the latter is practically impossible due to the lack of sufficient funds for this. Turkmenistan’s participation simultaneously in the CIS and the OER, as well as in other international organizations, contributes to the conflict-prone situation of “prize struggle” between various applicants for approval, including by force, of their understanding of “security guarantees.” It was a similar situation that resulted in a bloody armed confrontation between various groups in Tajikistan.

      Thus, Turkmenistan faces a choice: whether to build its foreign policy on a Eurasian basis with the priority of an alliance with the CIS countries, whether to get involved in the Middle Eastern regionalism of Islamic states, or, together with Kazakhstan and Uzbekistan, build an independent Central Asian subsystem of international relations. An attempt to claim independence, and therefore not joining any of these systems (subsystems), firstly, will require agreement on such a role for Turkmenistan of the main “centers of power” associated with it, which is very unlikely, and secondly, it will require the use of such a volume of various resources, which are also very problematic to find.

      An important geopolitical reserve for ensuring relative independence in Turkmenistan’s foreign policy is the prospect of establishing its relations with such a still influential subject of the global geopolitical system of the world as the Non-Aligned Movement. Now it includes over 100 countries in Asia, Africa, Latin America and Europe. The 11th Conference of Foreign Ministers of the Non-Aligned Movement, held in Cairo in June 1994, noted at the same time that the important role of non-aligned countries in the modern world and the need for a deep renewal of the philosophy and concept of non-aligned countries. In international relations, non-alignment manifests itself in three forms: as the foreign policy doctrine of most developing countries, as the specific foreign policy course of these countries and as a kind of interstate political association of independent states. Turkmenistan, benefiting from considerable geopolitical benefits, could intensify efforts to integrate the renewal of the Non-Aligned Movement into diverse processes.

      The considered variety of prerequisites for the formation of Turkmenistan’s foreign policy should still be fully understood by politicians. On this basis alone, it can be no coincidence that there is an awareness of the foundations of the consistency of the state’s foreign policy activities, namely the definition of its subjects, basic needs, interests, basic values, goals and objectives.

      Taking into account the cultural and historical community of participants in the foreign policy process, Turkmenistan should be provided with relatively independent directions of its foreign policy:

      related to building relations with Turkish-speaking countries, with countries of Central Asia, the Middle and Middle East;

      with European states;

      with countries that are leading representatives of other world cultures.

      The culture, language, traditions of the Turkmen people are historically associated with the peoples of Turkic-speaking, Muslim states, and their artificial division during the period of domination of totalitarianism in the USSR had very difficult consequences. It must be admitted that the people of Turkmenistan have to some extent departed from their national and cultural origins, which, in turn, led to a certain historical disorientation of the nation. Therefore, the establishment of good-neighborly relations with neighboring Central Asian states will undoubtedly become a priority direction of Turkmenistan’s foreign policy.

      At the jubilee session of the UN General Assembly, which opened in New York on October 22, 1995, Turkmenistan spoke and the world community received it with complete unanimity.

      December 12, 1995 on the basis of UN General Assembly Resolution No. 50/80. Turkmenistan is proclaimed a permanent neutral state. By virtue of its goals and objectives as defined by the Charter and its general interest in a peace-loving policy, the UNGA has followed the path of supporting, recognizing Turkmenistan’s neutrality and ensuring guarantees of existence. Thus, the resolution emphasizes that the UN “expressing the hope that the status of permanent neutrality of Turkmenistan will contribute to the strengthening of peace and security in the region, recognizes and supports the status of permanent neutrality proclaimed by Turkmenistan.”

      Support of the UN is a rare occurrence in more than half a century of the history of this international organization.

      Neutrality is one of the most important forms of monitoring the implementation of international humanitarian law. For more than half a century of the existence of the UN, the content of many international legal institutions has received new development and needs to be clarified. It seems necessary to clarify and supplement the content of the Institute of Neutrality, since more than enough time has passed since its inception as an international legal category. During this period, many neutral states appeared in the world. It should be emphasized that Turkmenistan’s neutrality differs from other similar states in terms of the method and conditions of acquisition. For example, in historical terms, the institution of neutrality arose in the science of humanitarian law in armed conflicts (more precisely, the “law of war” developed by Hugo Grotsiy) and was long considered as a way of non-participation of the country in armed conflict. The expression of this approach was the neutral status of Switzerland.

      There is an opinion that constant neutrality leads to self-isolation of Turkmenistan. Those concerns are not true. The freedom of action of a neutral state is so great that Finland and Sweden participate not only in the political, but also in the military actions of the UN. Neutral status allows them to strengthen their international authority. Thanks to their neutrality, Switzerland, Sweden, Finland – small states, somewhat commensurate in status with Turkmenistan, were able to develop active economic, trade and other ties with members of different blocs and that is why they became one of the most developed countries.

      Neutral

Скачать книгу