LITMIR.BIZ

      Introduction

      This work is part of a collection of books, published by ISTE and Wiley, devoted to metaheuristics and their applications. Known for being specific and particular algorithms, what practical interest do metaheuristics have to make them increasingly attractive to engineers, researchers and scientists from various areas interested in different fields of application? There are two important arguments that provide us with obvious answers: on the one hand, the scope of application of metaheuristics is constantly gaining momentum, without apparently being concerned with any limitations; on the other hand, these resolution methods possess a high level of abstraction, which makes them adaptable to a wide range of engineering problems. Furthermore, a small number of necessary adjustments that do not change the nature of algorithms are usually sufficient to solve new optimization problems without any particular links existing between them.

Moreover, metaheuristics belong to a particular class of algorithms, not always easy to configure and reserved for difficult optimization problems for which there are no accurate methods to solve them more efficiently. These problems are renowned for being complex and among them we can find problems whose mathematical models are not derivable; problems whose research space is too extended to exhaustively enumerate all feasible solutions, such as problems of a combinatorial nature or involving continuous decision variables; as well as any problem making use of highly noisy, erroneous or even incomplete data, which prove unsuitable for mathematical modeling. For all these categories of problems, we generally adopt approximated solutions belonging to the field of admissible solutions, which are capable of reaching a goal without violating constraints that might be a priori imposed.

      In practice, there may be several existing solutions to an optimization problem, of which only one of these solutions is generally optimal. All others are suboptimal solutions, but are still eligible, so-called acceptable, solutions because they guarantee the completion of an objective without violating associated constraints. However, the notion of optimizing acceptability may appear to be overly abstract: how can the level of solution operability be identified when the level of appreciation of that solution may vary not only from one user to another, but also with the margin of error tolerated by each type of application? Clearly, there is no absolute answer to this question, because it is ultimately each individual who decides how to define the level of acceptability for a solution, based on individual needs and the quality of the results sought for the application to be addressed.

Are metaheuristics deterministic or stochastic algorithms? Providing a clear answer to this question is also not an easy task. In effect, while it is clear that metaheuristics are not deterministic algorithms, they are also not completely stochastic algorithms. In fact, they can be categorized halfway between these two families of algorithms, because solving an optimization problem by means of a metaheuristic systematically relies on a more or less random sampling process of the solution space. When the algorithm is started, chance plays an important role in the process of finding solutions. Then, as the iterations progress, this randomness is progressively attenuated as we approach the final phase of the algorithm. Therefore, a metaheuristic will behave as a stochastic algorithm during initial iterations, and will asymptotically tend towards a greedy and deterministic algorithm during the last iterations. As we might expect, the accuracy of a metaheuristic lies in the right balance to be found between exploration phases, in which chance plays an important role, and the phases of intensification of solutions, also called phases of exploitation, in which randomness is reduced in order to focus only on potentially promising solutions. At the moment, there is no automatic parameterization method for these two search phases, whose respective weights generally depend on the type of application under study, the type of computational effort to be sustained and the type of results sought after.

      Today, metaheuristics have become almost unavoidable in numerous areas of engineering due to the difficulties that have to be overcome to properly solve common optimization problems. These difficulties generally lie in the complex nature of the systems under study: the number of constraints and decision variables to be taken into account can be very high, computational times can be very long and non-differentiable objective functions can be highly multimodal or even too complex to be mathematically formalized with accuracy. The field of robotics is by nature a very broad field of application. In fact, these very relevant algorithms can be found in many applications of robotics: