LITMIR.BIZ

Скачать книгу

materially gain from the enforcement and adherence to such pretense; but at the expense of his own detachment from feeling and, in the long run, our children's children will pay the cost, a price set by those who cement their loyalty to the numbing duty of making life a business. Within this context, business is not the commerce of mutual trade but is manipulation that utilizes grossly unfair group tactics. The group tactics of entity promote a scrub life by allowing for a poor and meager existence at labor's bottom end. Some argue that this is the bottom that is necessary for there to be a top; or, they argue, that those at the bottom must have agreed to be there because, without that agreement, there could be no top or bottom.

      But it is not a natural monetary squeeze that causes such a condition at the bottom. The root cause of top and bottom economic ends is social sanction implicated by group tactics or means to inhibit growth of well-being in favor of progress. Progress advances while well-being is forbidden and denounced. The social vortex begins its pull downward. Top/bottom arrangement forms a blame loop that is made to represent progression from one point to another. A sub-parallel labyrinth is used to simulate forward momentum as a suggestion of time progression. This is a false and humanely devastating tactic that is used to incite fluctuations of inflation and deflation, for the momentum that seals in fated consequence and devotion to unrequited duty.

      The social vortex of group pulls even harder. We assume that future represents a forward aim—a movement toward someplace that is forward of now. The notion that there exists a starting point from which we can, then, move in a straight line to another point, is dubious. There is no place and no time beyond now.

      Improvement sanctions discontent and, yet, discontent is always punished.

      Word use gives us the illusion of movement. We reason that results give us a progressive hold on time. Yet, there is a final time when we cannot escape the fact that awareness is not knowledge and that intelligence is not memory. To insist that knowledge is truth is to insist that we know something valid in order to exercise right over cognition. Our agreement to the validation of truth and right and knowledge is our religion and we sell it to those who can remember it and afford it and carry it, for gain, into blame loop synthesis, the deceptive art.

      Subconscious is a tool to perpetuate paradox. But all that we sell and teach and all that we have been sold and taught is not nearly as fated as what we refuse to admonish by feeling, a priori of life: sensual interrogation and sixth sense reasoning.

      We misconceive feeling as random hindrance and denunciation of reasoned intent. Feeling is human awareness embodied in a single dynamic and rarefied sensation thrown into the physical neural network for doubt; that is the cause of thought and the cause of reason to form: reason, either to gather more information and push feeling into voidance; or to take it deeper, into Valhalla, where we can retrace the logic backward until we reach the calm where natural fear impetus resides, in peace, near the creature. One reason has voice and the other, none necessary.

      In describing will or the act of choosing an I approach to life or a We approach to the tandem standardization of I, another form of I or We begins. That which will always precede I is self, and that which precedes the possible self is feeling: the sensual channels held open to nature and, by nature, for natural inspection and interrogation. I and We imposition is the lead-in to paradox. Will does not exist by or for We pretext nor does volition apply to a random and superficial introspection that could become the subject of We without personification. The embodiment of what could be called will is no more than self-realized connection to place: the mind/body fullness as it reaches to all aspects of feeling, and the recollection of what sensual impact implies and impresses upon memory for information or cross-referencing for a continuing query that is of and about life itself. What is makeshift will is a contrivance bearing manipulated cause and effect through an agreed and certified blame loop: a provoker function good/right theme that provides appropriate schemes and advantages for group manifest authoritarian right and privilege to which one must subscribe in order to succeed. The social, mental vortex of reason is formulated and paradox begins. There is no freedom from its compression and pull.

      In group manifest, there is no such thing as will. Will, in paradox, is manifest We and is both prize and reprisal for the forsaken self. Impasse is imminent; and it will overwhelm the frail creature that is human. In R.I.P., it is but a dim possibility that any one human being can be a unique individual complete with working feeling.

      The creature, human beast, whom, by the act of our agreed volition in group truth, we keep firmly shackled, is poised to take flight. His supreme anger is his strength to break chains.

      III. IT: THE VOICE

      III

      IT: THE VOICE

      Sound: The Mental Scaffolding of the Subconscious

      What began in fear and opposition,

      became the Agreement Process; the single

      most lethal action ever enacted upon an entire generation

      in the name of civilized good.

      —J. P. Beyor, Through the Labyrinth to the Invisible Self (Vol. II)

      THE HUMAN MIND IS A MULTIFACETED and ambidextrous orb capable of assimilating impulses for balance, posture, walking, visual acuity and the delicate senses of taste, smell and touch. The human mind is capable of examining and identifying everything, within an introspection, so fast that there can be no computer invented that can do all that the mind and body can do with its vast cerebral network of impulses. The dynamics of the human being are always either entering new sensual/intellectual highs or succumbing to such exasperating despair that the existing knowledge, replete with taught mental impasse, is not able to rise above it.

      In a traverse of the elements of speech, we strive to conduct our mumbling into mutually received and conjointly logical communication of tacitly marked sensual cues. Language is spoken, not just with words, but with movement and action as well. Words are the lowest and poorest denominators applied to the task of expression. Words are like empty shells that lie fallow and dormant without the full and combined use of our sensory perception—the satisfaction of minute and voluminous collections of information detected by the masterful skills of the five senses.

      Speech is a culmination of sound that falls on the otic nerve. Sound interplays with continually incoming information that is absorbed and assimilated through all the senses for thorough cross-reference of tangible matter. Beyond that which is palpable through the senses is the luminosity of culminated perceptions: an ever-balancing wall of color and sound and fragrance and succulence.

      What, specifically, are the properties of sound that cause it to fit or not to fit within the grand connections of sensual awareness? What credence do we give to sound that we do not accord to the other senses? What reason is there for separating the senses? How can one or two be placed above the others?

      Before any sounds are registered as more than background noise, the brain must inscribe them into its vast body of intrinsic codes and extraneous, emblematic prototypes. It imprints them as vibratory intonations only, with pitch and meter undefined and diffusely connected to the harmonic whole of life. In such an undefined state, sound does not embody cause, but distills and dilates effect. Undefined, sound does not incarnate reason, but expands sensual stimulus. Purely received into sensory awareness, there is no ideation of want to disconnect it.

      Sound, separated from its unnamed and unmarked whole, is isolated for the purpose of locating distinction and applying labels. Once distinction is made and labels are designated, there is the continual search for a particular corresponding sound. Once a particular distinction is made, separation is easily marked out and presented for memory enhancement, and what was once only sound becomes speech. Sound, then, becomes active memory processing of referred sounds. Sound is the original scaffolding of the subconscious. It is worth noting that the perception of vision is not similarly enhanced for memory. What is perceived visually is made manifest through speech and nomenclature. The eyes are treated as mere windows into the vacuum of what was once the complete sensual or fully-dimensioned

Скачать книгу