LITMIR.BIZ

Скачать книгу

will invalidate ourselves, yet that which invalidates us for coherence to group consignment is exactly what points us to the path to the original self. Joining a group fortifies our mental muscle: I becomes We becomes They. We think that we are free when we have forged alliance with loyalty to duty. The group sustains agreed symbolism that is always subject to change without agreement, though changing to agree is commonplace and accepted. The deception is that there are no lies: all truths are valid by license and contract. Authorized use supercedes unauthorized disposition of self that is self in feeling, for feeling embodies no blame and contains no reason for right.

      The concept of community is an enactment policy based on archetypal prescriptions and societal prototypes within the structure of a parasitic morality that feeds from hosts of its own creation and drives back any objection to its gluttony that could deter its set plan of duty for reason and reason for duty. Duty, as decreed by societal morality, keeps our noses perpetually to the grindstone with no recompense. Prizes are dangled just out of reach, like carrots before the donkey, to keep us moving within the snare of future tense. We bend and break. We lose our richness of self.

      We are like dominoes, all in line: push one and all will fall. This is knowledge by agreement.

      Peace and goodwill do not come from the strapping and binding to moral and ethical insistence but are born of passion and clarity of purpose. Those who are pressed too hard against life's commercial glass doors push hard in the vain hope of gaining entrance to a world of material comfort. This ramrodding tactic does not work; for all fall into the trap that lies within the glass, between the two plainly marked boundaries of have and have not. This is the split of the condemned unworthy from those who are reasoned worthy for their group-practiced correctness and right. The entity of the politically empowered pretends to equalize the odds. But if they did as they promised, they would not exist. Politicians are champions of reason conflict.

      It is the theme of the correct that we are taught to crave while we exist inside an impenetrable mental fog: antecedent memory that dulls and binds. Every school child knows this: No one cares for the child as long as indoctrination takes—as long as ersatz momentum sucks him into performance ratings.

      Our legacy makes us slaves to reason and masters of reason and partisans of reason. We are stillborn inside the mental womb.

      The R.I.P. is the breakdown of fragility; the fragmentation of regard; the cutting into two concise parts that could, as easily, be left whole—one half that is devoted to calculation and the other half for the dispersal of the ensuing haze. Conscious memory is subconscious implant. It is a sub-parallel attended only by sight and sound.

      The human mind is a finely tuned recorder when it is allowed to make palatable that which is felt. Reasoned with specifically and without artifice, this sensual instrument can automatically pull all order down into mental clearing. The home of the heart is this perfect calm and to its home it will return, whether in life or just before death: the being called human will face itself. We all must speak to and break down to the void. What, then, defines us? What is it that we so skillfully dodge?

      The R.I.P. invokes reason stacking; power-housing of I/We complexities for future tense drive-line think factory that pulls and tears at the being that is frail.

      The R.I.P. executes blame cycling in made-meant-mean loops of reason and pretends itself away from feeling and from entering emotional corridors. Justifying loops of blame become adjunctive to the device of future-place holdings and invites the masses to follow. Those who join rank are deemed flawless. Those who refuse are failures by connotation.

      What of those who refuse to play mental roulette? Do we label them dysfunctional? Suffering from some traumatic distortion, hallucination, euphoria or despair? The hoax of reason has hoaxed itself so many times that there is no conception of reality outside reason. In order to conceive a reality beyond all reason, one must remove oneself from it and pay serious penalty. Those who do not coincide with reason are considered freakish or cultist or, at the very least, eccentric. Psychological invention is capable of a sweeping devaluation of anything that comes in the way of agreed and failsafed reason in motion. Full value is given to all reasonable and governing intent for suppositious conscious growth and the hope for progress in future psycho-good. Nouns stacked on nouns call us to duty. The intention of noun/verb function as a device of factory think is to denote a manifested worth for the ordered symbiotic good of a group; but that is exclusive of common good. Understand and agree with group implication, buy its produce, sell its wares, enforce its imagined values and have reward: question insinuation and be cast adrift. Certification is by implication.

      A biased faculty of what is good and right must prevail in a divided state of mind. No validated right can create blame without agreement. The essence of self, the creature, must not escape its cerebral tomb. Inside its casements of weighty solids, the creature, constrained, knows this. The silence of the human beast endures in aloneness, emptiness and sensual sojourn; waiting, listening and feeling until, through the residual vapors of fallen equivalents, it can find its own likeness. When we can find this, time ceases and we can enter the perfect now.

      II. VOLITION

      II

      VOLITION

      Will Given Over to Word Manipulation

      Who overcomes

      By force, hath overcome

      but half his foe.

      —John Milton, Paradise Lost

      DOES THE HUMAN BEING HAVE FREE WILL?

      No; not unless he or she is removed from the truth that is connected within the agreement process. All other truths, being subjective, lie accountable to the self in periphery side effects: truth that is accountable to truth is no truth at all. The befuddled mind that is said to govern free will is reliant upon no self will at all. The befuddled and overburdened mind cannot, in one sitting, differentiate between rules and laws designed for blame, as the preclusion of free will and the intrinsic self that is the catalyst and crucible of free will and free range of thought.

      Those who deny will in favor of an entity of we are favored partners in a protective agreement process designed and failsafed to de-authorize anyone who is not in synchronization with the boundary called impasse, the last reason held. Paradox must exist in impasse and it must insist upon the non-will of the many; utilizing a few elaborate and mundane devices built into a scheme that promises order through disorder. The failsafe in mass agreement is that there is no legitimate self-blame; for that is shrugged off as an impossibility, due to the forward of now mental state: intent. Future is not held accountable; for its motive is postulated as good; and good is not made responsible. All that is not good is tagged, by entity, as uncommitted promise that is not formidable.

      Progress, the stratagem that allows knowledge to hold sanctified reign over feeling, is, in light of that which is self, absurd and made idiotic by mass appeal for anything that can convey solid, mechanical truths, placed in noun/verb formats. Progress aligns itself with agreement that, the good of the group, is the right of the group to oversee, empower and protect the forward leaning truth; which both receives and sanctions itself. Progress is group agreement to do whatever is necessary to insure right over all claims to the truth of this social intention. Future is the word of progress based on a schematic promise to carry out future tense. Solid noun/verb usage, within a made-meant-mean system of label-think, provides failsafe to this burlesque of life, wherein assigned roles can be acted out and manipulated. Result is the word of the agreement process and the failsafe of knowledge is a ticking bomb set upon the human being. Tolerance levels are falsified through stacked intentions with fated assumptions.

      False tolerance levels, to all distortion and bending of the self, are quietly allowed to build and stack one upon the other until no legal parameters can hold such weighty expansion of hypocrisy. Civil disobedience, as a requisite for change, is duly provoked. Pretense gained is far greater than pretense dismissed: hypocrisy is encouraged, even when we do sense and know that, beneath it, there is much more to realize.

      Mankind

Скачать книгу