LITMIR.BIZ

Figure 3.3 Comparison of porosity of the three major Starbon types.

       Source: Original data adapted from Budarin et al. [9], White et al. [10], White et al. [11].

A more recent publication expanded on this synthesis by variation of the sulphonating agent and suspension times [20]. In this report, Starbon‐300 was chosen as the base material. The first synthesis was similar to that previously reported, except that a ratio of 0.2 g Starbon to 10 ml H₂SO₄ (96%) was used, and a suspension time of 15 hours. Further syntheses were reported using a mixture of ClSO₃H/H₂SO₄ as the sulphonating agent, in ratios of 2 : 10 and 3 : 10 by volume, respectively. In these cases, sulphonation was carried out at reflux for five hours.

       3.2.2.1.2 Characterisation of Sulphonated Material

      Sulphonated Starbon has been analysed thoroughly in terms of porosity, elemental composition, and SO₃H loading: all characteristics affecting the validity of these materials as solid acid catalysts. In the original publication, the SO₃H loading on Starbon‐400 was reported as 0.5 mmol g⁻¹ as determined by thermogravimetry coupled to infrared spectroscopy (thermogravimetry‐infra red [TGIR]) [17]. Further investigation showed that the loading remained in this region for preparation temperatures of 600 °C and below. Starbon‐650 and above resulted in a lower concentration of active acid sites (0.3–0.4 mmol g⁻¹) [18, 21]. This was further corroborated by pyridine absorption experiments showing that the acidity of sulphonated Starbon did not change considerably with preparation temperatures of 600 °C or less. However, stronger Lewis acidity was observed at lower temperatures [18, 19]. Later, Aldana‐Pérez et al. reported a –SO₃H content of 1.2, 1.8, and 2.3 mmol g⁻¹, and a total number of acid sites as 8.0, 8.2, and 10 mmol g⁻¹, respectively, for Starbon‐300 sulphonated by H₂SO₄ for 15 hours, a mixture of 2 : 10 ClSO₃H/H₂SO₄ for five hours, and a mixture of 3 : 10 ClSO₃H/H₂SO₄ for five hours [20]. In this case, acidity was measured by potentiometric titration.

      Transmission electron microscopy (s) and scanning electron microscopy (SEM) imaging of Starbon have shown that sulphonation did not considerably change the particle size or morphology of the material, which is amorphous after functionalisation, but the structure was prone to cracking at higher carbonisation temperatures as is true for the unsulphonated Starbon [18]. Starbon‐400 was shown to remain predominantly mesoporous (pore size 5–15 nm) after sulphonation, although the mean pore diameter and surface area decreased. As with the original Starbon, microporosity increased with preparation temperatures above 500 °C [19, 21]. A homogeneous distribution of elements was also observed [20]. Additional N₂ adsorption studies showed that the average pore diameter of sulphonated Starbon was 8–12 nm [21]. Sulphonated Starbon‐400 had a Brunauer‐Emmett‐Teller (BET) surface area of 386 m² g⁻¹ and pore volume of 0.62 cm³ g⁻¹. Aldana‐Pérez et al. reported a decrease in BET surface area on sulphonation from 163 m² g⁻¹ for Starbon‐300 to 66, 75, and 77 m² g⁻¹, respectively, for Starbon‐300 sulphonated by H₂SO₄ for 15 hours, a mixture of 2 : 10 ClSO₃H/H₂SO₄ for five hours, and a mixture of 3 : 10 ClSO₃H/H₂SO₄ for five hours [20].

Diffuse reflectance infra red (DRIFT IR) analysis of the original sulphonated Starbon‐400 showed little change in surface structures before and after sulphonation [18, 21]. Peaks in the region of 1300–600 cm⁻¹ were attributed to –SO₃H groups confirming the incorporation of sulphur into the Starbon structure, although differentiation between O–SO₃H and C–SO₃H was not possible. Aldana‐Pérez et al. performed fourier Transform infra red (FTIRP) photoacoustic spectra – an infrared technique particularly well suited to study dark samples – of the sulphonated and presulphonation Starbon, as shown in Table 3.1 [20]. In particular, this confirmed the presence of –SO₃ groups in the sulphonated Starbon by the appearance of the S=O band at approximately 1040 cm⁻¹. Additionally, there is a reduction in the CH₂/CH₃ signal at approximately 3000 cm⁻¹, which was attributed to oxidation of aliphatic carbons to carboxylic acids, although oxidation to ketones should also not be excluded in Starbon‐300, where significant carbohydrate character (in particular –CH(OH)– groups) should remain.

Table 3.1 Summarised IR data of a range of sulphonated and unsulphonated Starbon.

      Source: From Aldana‐Pérez et al. [20].

      Solid and liquid ¹³C NMR data were also collected for the sulphonated catalyst, Starbons‐300‐2–H₂SO₄–ClSO₃H–TEPO, using triethylphosphine oxide (TEPO) as a probe molecule to find the relative acid strength [20]. This was done by dissolving 0.05 g of material in 5 ml of 1

Скачать книгу