ТОП просматриваемых книг сайта:
Theories in Social Psychology. Группа авторов
Читать онлайн.Название Theories in Social Psychology
Год выпуска 0
isbn 9781119627944
Автор произведения Группа авторов
Издательство John Wiley & Sons Limited
76 George, J. M., & Jones, G. (1997). Experiencing work: values, attitudes, and moods. Human Relations, 50(4), 393–416. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.81.3.318
77 Goldberg, S., & Lewis, M. (1969). Play behavior in the yearold infant: Early sex differences. Child Development, 40(1), 21–32. https://doi.org/10.2307/1127152
78 Gouldner, A. W. (1960). The norm of reciprocity: A preliminary statement. American Sociological Review, 25(2), 161–178. https://doi.org/10.2307/2092623
79 Graupmann, V., Jonas, E., Meier, E., Hawelka, S., & Aichhorn, M. (2012). Reactance, the self, and its group: When threats to freedom come from the ingroup versus the outgroup. European Journal of Social Psychology, 42(2), 164–173. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.857
80 Guéguen, N. (2016). “You will probably refuse, but…”: When activating reactance in a single sentence increases compliance with a request. Polish Psychological Bulletin, 47(2), 170–173. http://dx.doi.org/10.1515/ppb-2016-0019
81 Hajek, K., & Veronika, H. M. (2021). Dynamics of opposition – how fear and sorrow moderate reactance arousal during the COVID-19 pandemic. PsychArchives. http://dx.doi.org/10.23668/psycharchives.4712
82 Hammock, T., & Brehm, J. W. (1966). The attractiveness of choice alternatives when freedom to choose is eliminated by a social agent. Journal of Personality, 34(4), 546–554. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6494.1966.tb02370.x
83 Harmon-Jones, E. (2004). Contributions from research on anger and cognitive dissonance to understanding the motivational functions of asymmetrical frontal brain activity. Biological Psychology, 67(1–2), 51–76. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biopsycho.2004.03.003
84 Harmon-Jones, E., & Allen, J. J. B. (1998). Anger and frontal brain activity: EEG asymmetry consistent with approach motivation despite negative affect valence. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74(5), 1310–1316. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.74.5.1310
85 Harmon-Jones, E., Harmon-Jones, C., & Price, T. F. (2013). What is approach motivation?Emotion Review, 5(3), 291–295. https://doi.org/10.1177/1754073913477509
86 Harmon-Jones, E., & Sigelman, J. (2001). State anger and prefrontal brain activity: Evidence that insult-related relative left prefrontal activation is associated with experienced anger and aggression. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 80(5), 797–803. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037//0022-3514.80.5.797
87 Heilman, M. E., & Toffler, B. L. (1976). Reacting to reactance: An interpersonal interpretation of the need for freedom. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 12(6), 519–529. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-1031(76)90031-7
88 Hellman, C. M., & McMillin, W. L. (1997). The relationship between psychological reactance and self-esteem. Journal of Social Psychology, 137(1), 135–138. https://doi.org/10.1080/00224549709595424
89 Homans, G. C. (1974). Social behavior: Its elementary forms. Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.
90 Hong, S.-M., Giannakopoulos, E., Laing, D., & Williams, N. A. (1994). Psychological reactance: Effects of age and gender. The Journal of Social Psychology, 134(2), 223–228. https://doi.org/10.1080/00224545.1994.9711385
91 Hong, S.-M. (1992). Hong’s psychological reactance scale: A further factor analytic validation. Psychological Reports, 70(2), 512–514. https://doi.org/10.2466/pr0.1992.70.2.512
92 Hong, S.-M., & Faedda, S. (1996). Refinement of the Hong’s psychological reactance scale. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 56(1), 173–180. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013164496056001014
93 Hong, S.-M., & Ostini, R. (1989). Further evaluation of Merz’s psychological reactance scale. Psychological Reports, 64(3), 707–710. https://doi.org/10.2466/pr0.1989.64.3.707
94 Hong, S.-M., & Page, S. (1989). A psychological reactance scale: Development, factor structure and reliability. Psychological Reports, 64(3_suppl), 1323–1326. https://doi.org/10.2466/pr0.1989.64.3c.1323
95 Hopp, T. (2015). The effect of numeracy on the relationship between state reactance and message evaluations. Communication Research Reports, 32(4), 314–321. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/08824096.2015.1089855
96 Huck, N. O. (1998). Psychological reactance and Millon’s personality theory: An integrative comparison. Unpublished doctoral dissertation. Kent State University.
97 Inman, R. A., Sousa, A. M., Cunha, D., & Moreira, P. (2019). Therapeutic reactance in adolescents: The psychometrics of the Therapeutic Reactance Scale in adolescents. Scandinavian Journal of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry and Psychology, 7(1), 20–28. https://doi.org/10.21307/sjcapp-2019-003
98 Johnson, P., & Buboltz, W. C., Jr. (2000). Differentiation of self and psychological reactance. Contemporary Family Therapy, 22(1), 91–102. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1007774600764
99 Johnson, E. J., & Tversky, A. (1983). Affect, generalisation, and the perception of risk. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 45(1), 20–31. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.45.1.20
100 Jonason, P. K. (2007). Further test of validity for the one dimensional Hong’s psychological reactance scale. Psychological Reports, 101(3), 871–874. https://doi.org/10.2466/PR0.101.7.871-874
101 Jonason, P.K., Bryan, A. & Herrera, (2010). Trimming the Fat Reveals a One-Factor Construct of Hong’s Psychological Reactance Scale. Individual Differences Research 8(4), 220–228.
102 Jonason, P. K., & Knowles, H. M. (2006). A unidimensional measure of Hong’s Psychological Reactance Scale. Psychological Reports, 98(2), 569–579. https://doi.org/10.2466/pr0.98.2.569-579
103 Joubert, C. E. (1990). Relationship among self- esteem, psychological reactance and other personality variables. Psychological Reports, 66(3_suppl), 1147–1151. https://doi.org/10.2466/pr0.1990.66.3c.1147
104 Kakihara, F., & Tilton-Weaver, L. (2009). Adolescents’ interpretations of parental control: Differentiated by domain and types of control. Child Development, 80(6), 1722–1738. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8624.2009.01364.x
105 Kang,