ТОП просматриваемых книг сайта:
Громкое молчание хороших людей. Буллинг, троллинг, харассмент и другие поводы остаться в стороне. Кэтрин Сандерсон
Читать онлайн.Название Громкое молчание хороших людей. Буллинг, троллинг, харассмент и другие поводы остаться в стороне
Год выпуска 2020
isbn 978-5-04-115460-8
Автор произведения Кэтрин Сандерсон
Жанр Общая психология
Серия Smart self-help
Издательство Эксмо
8
Технологический Институт Массачусетса, “When good people do bad things,” ScienceDaily, June 12, 2014, https://www. sciencedaily. com/releases/2014/06/140612104950. htm.
9
M. Cikara, A. C. Jenkins, N. Dufour, and R. Saxe, “Reduced self-referential neural response during intergroup competition predicts competitor harm,” NeuroImage 96 (2014): 36–43.
10
A. C. Jenkins and J. P. Mitchell, “Medial prefrontal cortex subserves diverse forms of self-reflection,” Social Neuroscience 6, no. 3 (2011): 211–218; W. M. Kelley, C. N. Macrae, C. L. Wyland, S. Caglar, S. Inati, and T. F. Heatherton, “Finding the self? An event-related fMRI study,” Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 14 (2002): 785–794; C. N. Macrae, J. M. Moran, T. F. Heatherton, J. F. Banfield, and W. M. Kelley, “Medial prefrontal activity predicts memory for self,” Cerebral Cortex 14, no. 6 (2004): 647–654.
11
A. Trafton, “Group mentality,” MIT Technology Review website, posted August 5, 2014, https://www. technologyreview. com/s/529791/group – mentality/.
12
S. Milgram, “Behavioral study of obedience,” Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology 67, no. 4 (1963): 371–378.
13
J. M. Burger, “Replicating Milgram: Would people still obey today?” American Psychologist 64 (2009): 1—11; D. Doliński, T. Grzyb, M. Folwarczny, P. Grzybała, K. Krzyszycha, K. Martynowska, and J. Trojanowski, “Would you deliver an electric shock in 2015? Obedience in the experimental paradigm developed by Stanley Milgram in the 50 years following the original studies,” Social Psychological and Personality Science 8, no. 8 (2017): 927–933.
14
W. H. Meeus and Q. A. Raaijmakers, “Administrative obedience: Carrying out orders to use psychological— administrative violence,” European Journal of Social Psychology 16 (1986): 311–324.
15
T. Blass, “Attribution of responsibility and trust in the Milgram obedience experiment,” Journal of Applied Social Psychology 26 (1996): 1529–1535.
16
A. Bandura, “Moral disengagement in the perpetration of inhumanities,” Personality and Social Psychology Review 3, no. 3 (1999): 193–209.
17
H. A. Tilker, “Socially responsible behavior as a function of observer responsibility and victim feedback,” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 14, no. 2 (1970): 95—100.
18
J. M. Burger, Z. M. Girgis, and C. C. Manning, “In their own words: Explaining obedience to authority through an examination of participants’ comments,” Social Psychological and Personality Science 2 (2011): 460–466. Two-thirds of those whose comments during the study suggested that they felt personally responsible for harming the learner stopped before giving the maximum shock, while only 12 percent of those who kept giving shocks up to the highest level ever expressed any feelings of personal responsibility.
19
E. A. Caspar, J. F. Christensen, A. Cleeremans, and P. Haggard, “Coercion changes the sense of agency in the human brain,” Current Biology 26, no. 5 (2016): 585–592.
20
E. Filevich, S. Kühn, and P. Haggard, “There is no free won’t: antecedent brain activity predicts decisions to inhibit,” PloS One 8, no. 2 (2013): e53053.
21
S. D. Reicher, S. A. Haslam, and J. R. Smith, “Working toward the experimenter: reconceptualizing obedience within the Milgram paradigm as identification-based followership,” Perspectives on Psychological Science 7, no. 4 (2012): 315–324.
22
L. Ross and R. E. Nisbett, The Person and the Situation: Perspectives of Social Psychology (London: Pinter and Martin, 2011).
23
Milgram, “Behavioral study of obedience.”
24
M. M. Hollander, “The repertoire of resistance: Non-compliance with directives in Milgram’s ‘obedience’ experiments,” British Journal of Social Psychology 54 (2015): 425–444.
25
F. Gino, L. D. Ordóñez, and D. Welsh, “How unethical behavior becomes habit,” Harvard Business Review blogpost, September 4, 2014, https://hbr. org/2014/09/how-unethical-behavior-becomes-habit.
26
D. T. Welsh, L. D. Ordóñez, D. G. Snyder, and M. S. Christian, “The slippery slope: How small ethical transgressions pave the way for larger future transgressions,” Journal of Applied Psychology 100, no. 1 (2015): 114–127.
27
I. Suh, J. T. Sweeney, K. Linke, and J. M. Wall, “Boiling the frog slowly: The immersion of C-suite financial executives into fraud,” Journal of Business Ethics (July 2018): 1—29.
28
B. T. Denny, J. Fan, X. Liu, S. Guerreri, S. J. Mayson, L. Rimsky, et al., “Insula-amygdala functional connectivity is correlated with habituation to repeated negative images,” Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience 9 no. 11 (2014): 1660–1667.
29
N. Garrett, S. C. Lazzaro, D. Ariely, and T. Sharot, “The brain adapts to dishonesty,” Nature Neuroscience 19 (2016): 1727–1732.
30
B. Gholipour, “How telling small lies can make you stop caring about big ones,” HuffPost, October 24, 2016, https://www. huffpost. com/entry/brain-dishonesty_n_580e4b26e4b0a03911edfff9.
31
S. J. Gilbert, “Another look at the Milgram obedience studies: The role of the gradated series of shocks,” Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 7, no. 4 (1981): 690–695.
32
A. Modigliani and F. Rochat, “The role of interaction sequences and the timing of resistance in shaping obedience and defiance to authority,” Journal of Social Issues 51, no. 3 (1995): 107–123.
33
D. J. Packer, “Identifying systematic disobedience in Milgram’s obedience experiments: A meta-analytic review,” Perspectives on Psychological Science 3, no. 4 (2008): 301–304.
34
S. A. Ifill, On the Court house Lawn: Confronting the Legacy of Lynching in the Twenty-First Century (Boston: Beacon Press, 2007).
35
&nbs