LITMIR.BIZ

Скачать книгу

in it, and the bitter humiliation some of its incidents caused us. The small British army marched at will through Virginia and Maryland, burned Washington, and finally retreated from before Baltimore and reembarked to take part in the expedition against New Orleans. Twice, at Bladensburg and North Point, it came in contact with superior numbers of militia in fairly good position. In each case the result was the same. After some preliminary skirmishing, manoeuvring, and volley firing, the British charged with the bayonet. The rawest regiments among the American militia then broke at once; the others kept pretty steady, pouring in quite a destructive fire, until the regulars had come up close to them, when they also fled. The British regulars were too heavily loaded to pursue, and, owing to their mode of attack, and the rapidity with which their opponents ran away, the loss of the latter was in each case very slight. At North Point, however, the militia, being more experienced, behaved better than at Bladensburg. In neither case were the British put to any trouble to win their victory.

      The above is a brief sketch of the campaigns of the war. It is not cheerful reading for an American, nor yet of interest to a military student; and its lessons have been taught so often by similar occurrences in other lands under like circumstances, and, moreover, teach such self-evident truths, that they scarcely need to be brought to the notice of an historian. But the crowning event of the war was the Battle of New Orleans; remarkable in its military aspect, and a source of pride to every American. It is well worth a more careful study, and to it I have devoted the last chapter of this work.

      New York City, 1883.

      [Illustration: Fig. 1.—Long gun.]

      [Illustration: Fig. 2.—Carronade.]

      [Illustration: Fig. 3.—Section of flush-decked corvette or sloop, carrying long guns. Such was the armament of the Pike and Adams, but most flush-decked ships mounted carronades.]

      [Illustration: Fig. 4.—Section of frigate-built ship, with long gun on main-deck and carronade on spar-deck. Taken from the American Artillerist's Companion, by Louis de Toussard (Philadelphia, 1811).]

      PRINCIPAL AUTHORITIES REFERRED TO

      (See also in alphabetical place in index.)

      American State Papers.

      Brenton, E. P. Naval History of Great Britain, 1783 to 1836. 2 vols., octavo. London, 1837.

      Broke, Adm., Memoir of, by Rev. J. G. Brighton. Octavo, London, 1866.

      "Captains' Letters" in Archives at Washington.

      Codrington, Adm. Sir E. Memoirs, edited by his daughter. 2 vols., octavo. London, 1873.

      Coggeshall, George. History of American Privateers. New York, 1876.

      Cooper, J. F. Naval History of the United States. New York, 1856.

      Dundonald, Earl. Autobiography of a Seaman. London, 1860.

      Douglass, Lord Howard. Naval Gunnery. Octavo. London, 1860.

      Emmons, Lieut. G. E. Statistical History of United States Navy, 1853.

      Farragut, Adm. D. G., Life of, by his son, Loyall Farragut. Octavo. New York, 1878.

      Gravière, Adm., J. de la. Guerres Maritimes. 2 vols., octavo. Paris, 1881.

      James, William. Naval History of Great Britain. 6 vols., octavo. London, 1837.

      James, William. Naval Occurrences with the Americans. Octavo, London, 1817.

      Lossing, Benson J. Field-book of the War of 1812. Octavo. New York, 1869.

      Low, C. R. History of the Indian Navy, 1613 to 1863. 2 vols., octavo. London, 1877.

      London Naval Chronicle.

      Marshall. Royal Naval Biography. 12 vols., octavo. London, 1825.

      "Masters-Commandant Letters" in the Archives at Washington.

      Morris, Com. Charles. Autobiography. Annapolis, 1880.

      Naval Archives at Washington.

      Niles. Weekly Register.

      Pielat. B. La Vie et les Actions Mémorables du St. Michel de Ruyter. Amsterdam, 1677.

      Rivière, Lieut. H. La Marine Française sous le Régime de Louis XV. Paris, 1859.

      Tatnall, Commod., Life, by C. C. Jones, Jr. Savannah, 1878.

      Toussard, L. de. American Artillerists' Companion. Phila., 1811.

      Troude, O. Batailles Navales de la France. Paris, 1868.

      Ward, Com. J. H. Manual of Naval Tactics. 1859.

      Yonge, Charles Duke. History of the British Navy. 3 vols., octavo. London, 1866.

      AUTHORITIES REFERRED TO IN CHAPTER X

      Alison, Sir A. History of Europe. Ninth edition. 20 vols. London, 1852.

      Butler, Adjutant-General Robert. Official Report for the Morning of Jan. 8, 1815.

      Codrington, Admiral Sir Edward. Memoir of, by Lady Bourchier. London, 1873.

      Cole, John William. Memoirs of British Generals Distinguished during the Peninsular War. London, 1856.

      Court of Inquiry on Conduct of General Morgan. Official Report.

      Gleig, Ensign H. R. Narrative of the Campaigns of the British Army at Washington, Baltimore, and New Orleans. Philadelphia, 1821.

      Jackson, Andrew. As a Public Man. A sketch by W G. Sumner. Boston, 1882.

      Jackson, General Andrew. Official Letters.

      James, William. Military Occurrences of the Late War. 2 vols. London, 1818.

      Keane, Major-General John. Letter, December 26, 1814.

      Lambert, General. Letters, January 10 and 28, 1815.

      Latour, Major A. Lacarriex. Historical Memoir of the War in West Florida and Louisiana. Translated from the French by H. P. Nugent. Philadelphia, 1816.

      Lossing, Benson J. Field-Book of the War of 1812. New York, 1859.

      Patterson, Com. Daniel G. Letters, Dec. 20, 1814, and Jan. 13, 1815.

      Monroe, James. Sketch of his Life, by Daniel C. Gilman. 16mo. Boston, 1883.

      Napier, Maj.-Gen. Sir W. F. P. History of the War in the Peninsula. 5 vols. New York, 1882.

      Scott, Lieut.-Gen. W. Memoirs, by himself, 2 vols. New York, 1864.

      Thornton, Col. W. Letter, Jan. 8, 1815.

      Chapter I

INTRODUCTORY

      Causes of the War of 1812—Conflicting views of America and Britain as regards neutral rights—Those of the former power right—Impossibility of avoiding hostilities—Declaration of war—General features of the contest—Racial identity of the contestants—The treaty of peace nominally leaves the situation unchanged—But practically settles the dispute in our favor in respect to maritime rights—The British navy and its reputation prior to 1812—Comparison with other European navies—British and American authorities consulted in the present work.

      The view professed by Great Britain in 1812 respecting the rights of belligerents and neutrals was diametrically opposite to that held by the United States. "Between England and the United States of America," writes a British author, "a spirit of animosity, caused chiefly by the impressment of British seamen, or of seamen asserted to be such, from on board of American merchant vessels, had unhappily subsisted for a long time" prior to the war. "It is, we believe," he continues, "an acknowledged maxim of public law, as well that no nation but the one he belongs to can release a subject from his natural allegiance, as that, provided the jurisdiction of another independent state be not infringed, every nation has a right to enforce the services of her subjects wherever they may be found. Nor has any neutral nation such a jurisdiction over her merchant vessels upon the high seas as to exclude a belligerent nation from the right of searching them for contraband of war or for the property or persons of her enemies. And if, in the exercise of that right, the belligerent should discover on board of the neutral vessel a subject who has withdrawn himself

Скачать книгу