Patriarchal Palestine - Archibald Henry Sayce

Скачать книгу

as to himself, and the records of the Patriarchal Age would have been preserved in the libraries of Canaan down to the time of its conquest by the Israelites.

      Perhaps a word or two is needed in explanation of the repetitions which will be found here and there in the following pages. They have been necessitated by the form into which I have been obliged to cast the book. A consecutive history of Patriarchal Palestine cannot be written at present, if indeed it ever can be, and the subject therefore has to be treated under a series of separate heads. This has sometimes made repetitions unavoidable without a sacrifice of clearness.

      In conclusion it will be noted, that the name of the people who were associated with the Philistines in their wars against Egypt and occupation of Palestine has been changed from Zakkur to Zakkal. This has been in consequence of a keen-sighted observation of Prof. Hommel. He has pointed out that in a Babylonian text of the Kassite period, the people in question are mentioned under the name of Zaqqalu, which settles the reading of the hieroglyphic word. (See the Proceedings of the Society of Biblical Archaeology for May 1895.)

      A.H. SAYCE.

      September 30, 1895.

THE KINGS OF EGYPT AND BABYLONIA DURING THE PATRIARCHAL AGEEGYPTDynasties XV., XVI., and XVII.—Hyksos or Shepherd-kings (from Manetho)

      Dynasty XV.—

      Of the Sixteenth Dynasty nothing is known. Of the Seventeenth the monuments have given us the names of Apôphis II. (Aa-user-Ra) and Apôphis III. (Aa-ab-tani-Ra), in whose reign the war of independence began under the native prince of Thebes, and lasted for four generations.

      Dynasty XVIII.—

      Dynasty XIX.—

      Dynasty XX.—

      Dynasty I. of Babylon—

      1. Sumu-abi, 15 years, B.C. 2458.

      2. Sumu-la-ilu, his son, 35 years.

      3. Zabû, his son, 14 years.

      4. Abil-Sin, his son, 18 years.

      5. Sin-muballidh, his son, 30 years.

      6. Khammu-rabi, his son, 55 years (at first under the sovereignty of Chedor-laomer, the Elamite; by the conquest of Eri-Aku and the Elamites he unites Babylonia, B.C. 2320).

      7. Samsu-iluna, his son, 35 years.

      8. Ebisum, or Abi-esukh, his son, 25 years.

      9. Ammi-satana, his son, 25 years.

      10. Ammi-zaduga, his son, 21 years.

      11. Samsu-satana, his son, 31 years.

      Dynasty II. of Uru-azagga, B.C. 2154—

      1. Anman, 51 (or 60) years.

      2. Ki-nigas, 55 years.

      3. Damki-ili-su, 46 years.

      4. Iskipal, 15 years.

      5. Sussi, his brother, 27 years.

      6. Gul-kisar, 55 years.

      7. Kirgal-daramas, his son, 50 years.

      8. A-dara-kalama, his son, 28 years.

      9. A-kur-du-ana, 26 years.

      10. Melamma-kurkura, 6 years.

      11. Bel-ga[mil?], 9 years.

      Dynasty III., of the Kassites, B.C. 1786—

      1. Gandis, or Gaddas, 16 years.

      2. Agum-Sipak, his son, 22 years.

      3. Guya-Sipak, his son, 22 years.

      4. Ussi, his son, 8 years.

      5. Adu-medas, … years.

      6. Tazzi-gurumas, … years.

      7. Agum-kak-rimi, his son, … years.

      (The following order of succession is taken from Dr. Hilprecht.)

      14. Kallimma-Sin.

      15. Kudur-Bel.

      16. Sagarakti-buryas, his son.

      17. Kuri-galzu I.

      18. Kara-indas,

      19. Burna-buryas, his nephew, B.C. 1400.

      20. Kara-Khardas, son of Kara-indas.

      21. Nazi-bugas, or Su-zigas, an usurper.

      22. Kuri-galzu II., son of Burna-buryas, 2. years.

      23. Nazi-Maruttas, his son, 26 years.

      24. Kadasman-Turgu, his son, 17 years.

      25. Kadasman-Burias, his son, 2 years.

      26. Gis-amme ti, 6 years.

      27. Saga-rakti-suryas 13 years.

      28. Kasbat, or Bibe-yasu, his son, 8 years.

      29. Bel-nadin-sumi, 1 year 6 months.

      30. Kadasman-Kharbe, 1 year 6 months.

      31. Rimmon-nadin-sumi, 6 years.

      32. Rimmon-sum-utsur, 30 years (including 7 years of occupation of Babylon by the Assyrian king, Tiglath-Ninip).

      33. Mile-Sipak, 15 years.

      34. Merodach-baladan I., his son, 13 years.

      35. Zamania-nadin-sunii I., 1 year.

      36. Bel-sum-iddin, 3 years.

      CHAPTER I

      THE LAND

      Patriarchal Palestine! There are some who would tell us that the very name is a misnomer. Have we not been assured by the German critics and their English disciples that there were no patriarchs and no Patriarchal Age? And yet, the critics notwithstanding, the Patriarchal Age has actually existed. While criticism, so-called, has been busy in demolishing the records of the Pentateuch, archaeology, by the spade of the excavator and the patient skill of the decipherer, has been equally busy in restoring their credit. And the monuments of the past are a more solid argument than the guesses and prepossessions of the modern theorist. The clay tablet and inscribed stone are better witnesses to the truth than literary tact or critical scepticism. That Moses and his contemporaries could neither read nor write may have been proved to demonstration by the critic; yet nevertheless we now know, thanks to archaeological discovery, that it would have been a miracle if the critic were right. The Pentateuch is, after all, what it professes to be, and the records it contains are history and not romance.

      The question of its authenticity involves issues more serious and important than those which have to do merely with history or archaeology. We are sometimes told indeed, in all honesty of purpose, that it is a question of purely literary interest, without influence on our theological faith. But the whole fabric of the Jewish Church in the time of our Lord was based upon the belief that the Law of Moses came from God, and that this God "is not a man that He should lie." And the belief of the Jewish Church was handed on to the Christian Church along with all its consequences. To revise that belief is to revise the dogmas of the Christian Church as they have been held for the last eighteen centuries; to reject it utterly is to reject the primary document of the faith into which we have been baptized.

      It is not, however, with theological matters that we are now concerned. Patriarchal Palestine is for us the Palestine of the Patriarchal Age, as it has been disclosed by archaeological research, not the Palestine in which the revelation of God's will to man was to be made. It is sufficient for us that the Patriarchal Age has been shown by modern discovery to be a fact, and that in the narratives of the Book of Genesis we have authentic records of the past. There was indeed a Patriarchal Palestine, and the glimpses of it that we get in the Old Testament have been illustrated and supplemented by the ancient monuments of the Oriental world.

      Whether the name of Palestine can be applied to the country with strict accuracy

Скачать книгу