LITMIR.BIZ

Скачать книгу

"delicious," "glorious," &c. See (2).

      *2. Avoid exaggerations.*

      "The boundless plains in the heart of the empire furnished inexhaustible supplies of corn, that would have almost sufficed for twice the population."

      Here "inexhaustible" is inconsistent with what follows. The words "unprecedented," "incalculable," "very," and "stupendous" are often used in the same loose way.

      *3. Avoid useless circumlocution and "fine writing."*

      "Her Majesty here partook of lunch." Write "lunched."

      "Partook of" implies sharing, and is incorrect as well as lengthy.

      So, do not use "apex" for "top," "species" for "kind," "individual" for "man," "assist" for "help," &c.

      *4. Be careful how you use the following words: "not … and," "any," "only," "not … or," "that."*5

      *And.* See below, "Or."

      *Any.*—"I am not bound to receive any messenger that you send."

      Does this mean every, or a single? Use "every" or "a single."

      *Not.*—(1) "I do not intend to help you, because you are my enemy &c." ought to mean (2), "I intend not to help you, and my reason for not helping you is, because you are my enemy." But it is often wrongly used to mean (3), "I intend to help you, not because you are my enemy (but because you are poor, blind, &c.)." In the latter case, not ought to be separated from intend. By distinctly marking the limits to which the influence of not extends, the ambiguity may be removed.

      *Only* is often used ambiguously for alone. "The rest help me to revenge myself; you only advise me to wait." This ought to mean, "you only advise, instead of helping;" but in similar sentences "you only" is often used for "you alone." But see 21.

      *Or.*—When "or" is preceded by a negative, as "I do not want butter or honey," "or" ought not, strictly speaking, to be used like "and," nor like "nor." The strict use of "not … or" would be as follows:—

      "You say you don't want both butter and honey—you want butter or honey; I, on the contrary, do not want butter or honey—I want them both."

      Practically, however, this meaning is so rare, that "I don't want butter or honey" is regularly used for "I want neither butter nor honey." But where there is the slightest danger of ambiguity, it is desirable to use nor.

      The same ambiguity attends "not … and." "I do not see Thomas and John" is commonly used for "I see neither Thomas nor John;" but it might mean, "I do not see them both—I see only one of them."

      *That.*—The different uses of "that" produce much ambiguity, e.g. "I am so much surprised by this statement that I am desirous of resigning, that I scarcely know what reply to make." Here it is impossible to tell, till one has read past "resigning," whether the first "that" depends upon "so" or "statement." Write: "The statement that I am desirous of resigning surprises me so much that I scarcely know &c."

      *4 a. Be careful in the use of ambiguous words, e.g. "certain."*

      "Certain" is often used for "some," as in "Independently of his earnings, he has a certain property," where the meaning might be "unfailing."

      Under this head may be mentioned the double use of words, such as "left" in the same form and sound, but different in meaning. Even where there is no obscurity, the juxtaposition of the same word twice used in two senses is inelegant, e.g. (Bain), "He turned to the left and left the room."

      I have known the following slovenly sentence misunderstood: "Our object is that, with the aid of practice, we may sometime arrive at the point where we think eloquence in its most praiseworthy form to lie." "To lie" has been supposed to mean "to deceive."

      *5. Be careful how you use "he," "it," "they," "these," &c.* (For "which" see 8.) The ambiguity arising from the use of he applying to different persons is well known.

      "He told his friend that if he did not feel better in half an hour he thought he had better return." See (6) for remedy.

      Much ambiguity is also caused by excessive use of such phrases as in this way, of this sort, &c.

      "God, foreseeing the disorders of human nature, has given us certain passions and affections which arise from, or whose objects are, these disorders. Of this sort are fear, resentment, compassion."

      Repeat the noun: "Among these passions and affections are fear &c."

      Two distinct uses of it may be noted. It, when referring to something that precedes, may be called "retrospective;" but when to something that follows, "prospective." In "Avoid indiscriminate charity: it is a crime," "it" is retrospective.6 In "It is a crime to give indiscriminately," "it" is prospective.

      The prospective "it," if productive of ambiguity, can often be omitted by using the infinitive as a subject: "To give indiscriminately is a crime."

      *6. Report a speech in the First, not the Third Person, where necessary to avoid ambiguity.* Speeches in the third person afford a particular, though very common case, of the general ambiguity mentioned in (5). Instead of "He told his friend that if he did not feel better &c.," write "He said to his friend, 'If, I (or you) don't feel better &c.'"

      *6 a. Sometimes, where the writer cannot know the exact words, or where the exact words are unimportant, or lengthy and uninteresting, the Third Person is preferable.* Thus, where Essex is asking Sir Robert Cecil that Francis Bacon may be appointed Attorney-General, the dialogue is (as it almost always is in Lord Macaulay's writings) in the First Person, except where it becomes tedious and uninteresting so as to require condensation, and then it drops into the Third Person:

      "Sir Robert had nothing to say but that he thought his own abilities equal to the place which he hoped to obtain, and that his father's long services deserved such a mark of gratitude from the Queen."

      *6 b. Omission of "that" in a speech reported in the Third Person.*—Even when a speech is reported in the third person, "that" need not always be inserted before the dependent verb. Thus, instead of "He said that he took it ill that his promises were not believed," we may write, "'He took it ill,' he said, 'that &c.'" This gives a little more life, and sometimes more clearness also.

      *7. When you use a Participle, as "walking," implying "when," "while," "though," "that," make it clear by the context what is implied.*

      "Republics, in the first instance, are never desired for their own sakes. I do not think they will finally be desired at all, unaccompanied by courtly graces and good breeding."

      Here there is a little doubt whether the meaning is "since they are, or, if they are, unaccompanied."

      *That or when.*—"Men walking (that walk, or when they walk) on ice sometimes fall."

      It is better to use "men walking" to mean "men when they walk." If the relative is meant, use "men that walk," instead of the participle.

      (1) "While he was } Walking on { (1) the road, } he fell." (2) "Because he was } { (2) the ice, }

      When the participle precedes the subject, it generally implies a cause: "Seeing this, he retired." Otherwise it generally has its proper participial meaning, e.g. "He retired, keeping his face towards us." If there is any ambiguity, write "on seeing,"—"at the same time, or while, keeping."

      (1) "Though he was} {(1) he nevertheless stood } { his ground."

      (2) "Since he was } Struck with terror, {(2) he rapidly retreated."

      (3) "If he is } {(3) he will soon retreat."

      *8. When using the Relative Pronoun, use "who" and "which" where the meaning is "and he, it, &c.," "for he, it, &c." In other cases use "that,"

Скачать книгу