LITMIR.BIZ

Скачать книгу

to verify that its operations and policies are legal and in compliance with their stated security policies, industry obligations, contracts, and regulations. Auditing is necessary for compliance testing, also called compliance checking. Verification that a system complies with laws, regulations, baselines, guidelines, standards, best practices, contracts, and policies is an important part of maintaining security in any environment. Compliance testing ensures that all necessary and required elements of a security solution are properly deployed and functioning as expected. These are all important considerations when selecting risk response strategies.

      Inherent risk is the level of natural, native, or default risk that exists in an environment, system, or product prior to any risk management efforts being performed. Inherent risk can exist due to the supply chain, developer operations, design and architecture of a system, or the knowledge and skill base of an organization. Inherent risk is also known as initial risk or starting risk. This is the risk that is identified by the risk assessment process.

      Once safeguards, security controls, and countermeasures are implemented, the risk that remains is known as residual risk. Residual risk consists of threats to specific assets against which upper management chooses not to implement a response. In other words, residual risk is the risk that management has chosen to accept rather than mitigate. In most cases, the presence of residual risk indicates that the cost/benefit analysis showed that the available safeguards were not cost-effective deterrents.

      Total risk is the amount of risk an organization would face if no safeguards were implemented. A conceptual formula for total risk is as follows:

       threats * vulnerabilities * asset value = total risk

      The difference between total risk and residual risk is known as the controls gap. The controls gap is the amount of risk that is reduced by implementing safeguards. A conceptual formula for residual risk is as follows:

       total risk – controls gap = residual risk

As with risk management in general, handling risk is not a onetime process. Instead, security must be continually maintained and reaffirmed. In fact, repeating the risk assessment and risk response processes is a necessary function to assess the completeness and effectiveness of the security program over time. Additionally, it helps locate deficiencies and areas where change has occurred. Because security changes over time, reassessing on a periodic basis is essential to maintaining reasonable security.

      Control risk is the risk that is introduced by the introduction of the countermeasure to an environment. Most safeguards, security controls, and countermeasures are themselves some sort of technology. No technology is perfect and no security is perfect, so some vulnerability exists in regard to the control itself. Although a control may reduce the risk of a threat to an asset, it may also introduce a new risk of a threat that can compromise the control itself. Thus, risk assessment and response must be an iterative operation that looks back on itself to make continuous improvements.

      Cost vs. Benefit of Security Controls

      Often additional calculations are involved in risk response when a qualitative risk assessment is performed. These relate to the mathematical evaluation of the cost/benefit of a safeguard. For each identified risk in criticality priority order, safeguards are considered in regard to their potential loss reduction and benefit potential. For each asset-threat pairing (i.e., identified risk), an inventory of potential and available safeguards must be made. This may include investigating the marketplace, consulting with experts, and reviewing security frameworks, regulations, and guidelines. Once a list of safeguards is obtained or produced for each risk, those safeguards should be evaluated as to their benefit and their cost relative to the asset-threat pair. This is the cost/benefit evaluation of safeguards.

      Safeguards, security controls, and countermeasures will primarily reduce risk through a reduction in the potential rate of compromise (i.e., ARO). However, some safeguards will also reduce the amount or severity of damage (i.e., EF). For those safeguards that only reduce the ARO, the amount of loss of a single realized event (i.e., SLE) is the same with or without the safeguard. But, for those safeguards that also reduce the EF, any single realized event will cause less damage than if the safeguard was not present. Either way, a reduction of the ARO and potentially a reduction of the EF will result in a smaller ALE with the safeguard than without. Thus, this potential ALE with the safeguard should be calculated (ALE = AV * EF * ARO). We can then consider the original asset-threat pair risk ALE as ALE1 (or ALE pre-safeguard) and the safeguard-specific ALE as ALE2 (or ALE post-safeguard). An ALE2 should be calculated for each potential safeguard for each asset-threat pair. The best of all possible safeguards would reduce the ARO to 0, although this is extremely unlikely.

      Any safeguard that is selected to be deployed will cost the organization something. It might not be purchase cost; it could be costs in terms of productivity loss, retraining, changes in business processes, or other opportunity costs. An estimation of the yearly costs for the safeguard to be present in the organization is needed. This estimation can be called the annual cost of the safeguard (ACS). Several common factors affect ACS:

       Cost of purchase, development, and licensing

       Cost of implementation and customization

       Cost of annual operation, maintenance, administration, and so on

       Cost of annual repairs and upgrades

       Productivity improvement or loss

       Changes to environment

       Cost of testing and evaluation

      The value of the asset to be protected determines the maximum expenditures for protection mechanisms. Security should be cost-effective, and thus it is not prudent to spend more (in terms of cash or resources) protecting an asset than its value to the organization. If the cost of the countermeasure is greater than the value of the asset (i.e., the cost of the risk), that safeguard should not be considered a reasonable option. Also, if the ACS is greater than the ALE1 (i.e., the potential annual loss of an asset due to a threat), then the safeguard is not a cost-effective solution. If no safeguard options are cost-effective, then accepting the risk may be the only remaining option.

      Once you know the potential annual cost of a safeguard, you can then evaluate the benefit of that safeguard if applied to an infrastructure. The final computation in this process is the cost/benefit calculation, or cost/benefit analysis. This calculation is used to determine whether a safeguard actually improves security without costing too much. To determine whether the safeguard is financially equitable, use the following formula:

       [ALE pre-safeguard – ALE post-safeguard] – annual cost of safeguard (ACS) = value of the safeguard to the company

      If the result is negative, the safeguard is not a financially responsible choice. If the result is positive, then that value is the annual savings your organization may reap by deploying the safeguard because the rate of occurrence is not a guarantee of occurrence. If multiple safeguards seem to have a positive cost/benefit result, then the safeguard with the largest benefit is the most cost-effective option.

      The annual savings or loss from a safeguard should not be the only consideration when evaluating safeguards. You should also consider the issues of legal responsibility and prudent due care/due diligence. In some cases, it makes more sense to lose money in the deployment of a safeguard than to risk legal liability in the event of an asset disclosure or loss.

      In review, to perform the cost/benefit analysis of a safeguard, you must calculate the following three elements:

       The pre-safeguard ALE for an asset-threat pairing

       The potential post-safeguard ALE for an asset-threat pairing

       The ACS (annual cost of the safeguard)

      With those elements, you can finally obtain a value for the cost/benefit formula for this specific safeguard against

Скачать книгу