Скачать книгу

ideally remove lignin without affecting the desired carbohydrates, hence being energy effective while having a simple reactor design and low production of waste compounds (including solvents) [86]. Nevertheless, improvement of the current pretreatment technologies is still required to obtain economical solutions. Various pretreatment strategies and their advantages and disadvantages are illustrated in Table 1.2.

Method Pretreatment Advantages Disadvantages
Biological Fungi Energy effective Low hydrolysis rate
Degrades lignin/hemicellulose network
Physical Milling Reduces cellulose crystallinity Energy intensive
Chemical Ozonolysis Lignin reduction Cost ineffective (ozone)
Low microbial inhibitors
Organosolv Lignin and hemicellulose hydrolysis Big solvent volumes
Requires solvent recycle
Alkali Lignin removal Inefficient for softwoods
Large amounts of water
Reduces cellulose crystallinity Long pretreatment times
Limited hemicellulose degradation Base recycle
Concentrated acid High glucose yield Large amounts of acids
Energy effective Requires acid recycle
Reactor corrosion
Diluted acid Low microbial inhibitors Low sugar yields
Lower corrosion issues Degradation products
Ionic liquids Reduces cellulose crystallinity Cost ineffective (ionic liquids)
Higher accessible surface area Difficult recovery/separation of desired products
Lignin removal Potential toxicity and thermal instability of ionic liquids
Degrades lignin/hemicellulose network
Physicochemical Steam explosion Lignin removal High microbial inhibitors
Hemicellulose solubilization
Fair sugar yields Partial hemicellulose degradation
Economical
Ammonia fiber expansion (AFEX) Higher accessible surface area Inefficient with lignin‐rich biomass
Low microbial inhibitors Big ammonia volumes (cost)
CO2 explosion Higher accessible surface area No effect on lignin/hemicelluloses network
Low microbial inhibitors High pressure (cost, reactor)
Economical
Wet oxidation Lignin removal Cost ineffective (oxygen and alkaline catalyst)
Low microbial inhibitors
Energy effective

      The search of a true sustainable chemical industry is driven by the development of processes that rely on not only renewable feedstocks associated with low environmental impact techniques but also economic viability to compete with the well‐established oil and gas markets. To recede the dependency on polluting resources, creative solutions following a green design in the most restringing way are required. The following chapters in this book discuss various methods of biomass valorization, along with their respective challenges and innovative solutions, as means to progress toward chemical sustainability.

      1 1. United Nations Sustainable Development Knowledge Platform. (2019). Sustainable development goals. https://sustainabledevelopment.un.org/sdgs (accessed 20 November 2019).

      2 2. International Council of Chemical Associations. (2019). Sustainable development. https://www.icca-chem.org/sustainable-development/ (accessed 10 September 2019).

      3 3. Speight, J.G. (1999). The Chemistry and Technology of Petroleum. New York: Marcel Dekker.

      4 4. Filiciotto, L. and Luque, R. (2018). Nanocatalysis for green chemistry. In:

Скачать книгу