Скачать книгу

of attack, so stall appears to be greatly delayed, and the low adverse pressure gradient shown by the reduced slope of the pressure recovery may be a reason for the delay. At 30% span the ratio StartFraction c Over r EndFraction equals 0.374, StartFraction c Over r EndFraction equals 0.161 at 55% span, and at the 75% location StartFraction c Over r EndFraction equals 0.093. The increased lift also occurs in the post‐stall region and is attributed to the radial flow in the separated flow regions.

      Snel et al. (1993) have proposed a simple, empirical modification to the usually available 2‐D, static aerofoil lift coefficient data that fits the measured lift coefficients by Ronsten (1991) and the computed results given by 3‐D RANS CFD.

      If the linear part of the static, 2‐D, Clα curve is extended beyond the stall, then let ΔCl be the difference between the two curves. Then the correction to the 2‐D curve to account for the rotational, 3‐D, effects is 3 left-parenthesis StartFraction c Over r EndFraction right-parenthesis squared normal upper Delta upper C Subscript l:

r/R*100 30% 55% 75%
c/r 0.374 0.161 0.093
Angle of attack α 30.41° 18.12° 12.94°
Cl static (measured) 0.8 0.74 1.3
Cl rotating (measured) 1.83 0.93 1.3
Cl rotating (Snel) 1.87 0.84 1.3
Graph depicts a comparison of measured and Snel's predicted power curves for a NORTANK 300 kW turbine.

      The complete CP λ curve for the design is given in Figure 3.15.

      The blade is designed for optimum performance at a tip speed ratio of about 6 and, ideally, the angle of attack, uniform along the span at the level for which the lift/drag ratio is a maximum, is about 7° for the aerofoil concerned. At the lowest tip speed ratio shown in Figure 3.45, the entire blade is stalled, and for a rotational speed of 60 rpm, the corresponding wind speed will be 26 m/s, which is the cut‐out speed. For the highest tip speed ratio shown, the corresponding wind speed will be 4.5 m/s, the cut‐in speed. Maximum power is developed at a tip speed ratio of 4.0 in a wind speed of 13 m/s and, clearly, much of the blade is stalled.

Скачать книгу


Radius r mm mu equals StartFraction r Over upper R EndFraction Chord c mm Pitch β deg Thickness/chord ratio of blade %
1700 0.20 1085 15.0 24.6
2125 0.25 1045 12.1 22.5
2150