PID Control System Design and Automatic Tuning using MATLAB/Simulink. Liuping Wang. Отраслевые издания. . Читать онлайн. Литмир. LITMIR.BIZ

The closed-loop feedback control configuration for a PD controller is shown in Figure 1.3. For the double integrator system (1.7), with the derivative term included in the controller, then the closed-loop transfer function becomes

(1.9)

(1.10)

The closed-loop poles are determined by the solutions of the characteristic polynomial equation as

which are

Clearly, we can choose the values of images and images to achieve the desired closed-loop performance.

It is worthwhile emphasizing that almost without exception, the derivative term is different from the original form images in the implementation. This is because the derivative term images is not practically implementable and the differentiation of the output signal images leads to amplification of the measurement noise. Thus, there are a few modifications with regard to the derivative terms. Firstly, in order to avoid the problem caused by a step reference trajectory change (the so-called derivative kick problem (Hägglund (2012))), the derivative action is only implemented on the output signal images . Secondly, in order to avoid amplification of the measurement noise, a derivative filter is in a companionship with the derivative term images .

A commonly used derivative filter is a first order filter and has its time constant linked as a percentage to the actual derivative gain images in the form:

(1.11) equation

where images is typically chosen to be 0.1 (10%). images is chosen to be larger if the measurement noise is severe.

With the derivative filter images , a typical PD controller output is calculated as

(1.12) equation

Block diagram depicting PD controller structure in implementation.

Figure 1.4 PD controller structure in implementation.

where images is the filtered output response using (1.11). In a Laplace transform, the control signal is expressed as

(1.13) equation

Figure 1.4 shows the block diagram used for implementation of a PD controller with a filter.

If the derivative filter was not considered in the design, there is a certain degree of performance uncertainty due to the introduction of the filter. This may not be ideal for many applications. Designing a PD controller with the filter included will be discussed in Section 3.4.1.

1.2.3 Proportional Plus Integral Controller

A proportional plus integral (PI) controller is the most widely used controller among PID controllers. With the integral action, the steady-state error that had existed with the proportional controller alone (see Example 1.1) is completely eliminated. The output of the controller images is the sum of two terms, one from the proportional function and the other from the integral action, having the form,

(1.14) equation

where images is the error signal between the reference signal images and the output images , images is the proportional gain, and images is the integral time constant. The parameter images is always positive, and its value is inversely proportional to the effect of the integral action taken by the PI controller. A smaller images will result in a stronger effect of the integral action.

The Laplace transform of the controller output is

(1.15) Скачать книгу

Новинки

Популярные

Наши рекомендации

ТОП просматриваемых книг сайта:

PID Control System Design and Automatic Tuning using MATLAB/Simulink. Liuping Wang

Информация о произведении:

1.2.3 Proportional Plus Integral Controller