Чингисхан. Человек, завоевавший мир - Фрэнк Маклинн История в одном томе

Скачать книгу

Imaginary Kingdom p. 140.

      150

      Vladimirtsov; Life of Genghis p. 12; Ratchnevsky, Genghis Khan pp. 15–16; Olbricht 8i Pinks, Meng-tapei-lup. 3.

      151

      SHO pp. 127–128; SHR pp. 74–75; Togan, Flexibility pp. 68–69.

      152

      SHO pp. 127–128; SHR pp. 74–75; Togan, Flexibility pp. 69–70.

      153

      The Tanguts had an unfortunate habit of supporting all the losers on the steppes (Khazanov, Nomads pp. 234–236).

      154

      Togan, Flexibility pp. 70–72.

      155

      K. Uray-Kohalmi, ‘Siberische Parallelen zur Ethnographie der geheimen Geschichte der Mongolen,’ in Ligeti, Mongolian Studies pp. 247–264 (at pp. 262–263).

      156

      L. V Clark, ‘The Theme of Revenge in the Secret History of the Mongols,’ in Clark & Draghi, Aspects of Altaic Civilization рр. 33–57; Clark, ‘From the Legendary Cycle of Cinggis-gayan: The Story of an Encounter with 300 Yayichiud from the Allan Tobci,’ Mongolian Studies 5 (1979) рр. 5–39 (at pp. 37–38).

      157

      RT i p. 134; SHC pp. 11–13.

      158

      Rachewiltz says that the name of this earlier wife ‘cannot be determined despite many scholarly efforts’ (Rachewiltz, Commentary p. 313). Ratchnevsky, however, (Genghis Khan pp. 15–16, 224) is adamant that her name was Suchigu or Suchikel, sometimes referred to as Ko’agchin.

      159

      For the Ongirrad subclan as Hoelun’s home see Pelliot & Hambis, Campagnes pp. 402–409; Vladimirtsov Le regime social pp. 58–59. The Buriyat have generated a considerable literature. See Lattimore, Mongols of Manchuria p. 61; Atwood, Encyclopedia p. 61; Eric Haenisch, Die Geheime Geschichte p. 112; Elena Skubuik, ‘Buryat,’ in Hahnunen, Mongolian Languages pp. 102–128; Lincoln, Conquest pp. 51–52; West, Encyclopedia (2009) pp. 132–133. Travellers’ tales on the Buriyat include Sharon Hudgins, ‘Feasting with the Buriats of Southern Siberia,’ in Walker, Food on the Move pp. 136–156; Curtin, A Journey; Matthiessen, Baikal.

      160

      Rashid’s date of 1155 was followed by the early twentieth-century Russian historians Vladimirtsov and Barthold. Pelliot, always a contrarian, proposes the impossibly late date of 1167 (Pelliot, Notes sur Marco Polo i pp. 281–288). But the best authorities such as Rachewiltz and Ratchnevsky plump for 1162. See the detailed argumentation in Ratchnevsky, Genghis Khan pp. 17–19; Rachewiltz, Commentary pp. 320–321.

      161

      Rachewiltz, Commentary pp. 269, 272, 322–324.

      162

      SHC p. 14; Pelliot, Notes sur Marco Polo i pp. 288–289; Dunnell, Chinggis Khan p. 21 remarks that this was apt for a child of destiny.

      163

      Rachewiltz, Commentary p. 322.

      164

      RT i p. 135; Pelliot & Hambis, Campagnes pp. 171–175.

      165

      RT i p. 106; Gumilev, Imaginary Kingdom p. 142. For the game of knucklebones they played see Jean-Paul Roux, ‘A propos des osselets de Gengis Khan,’ in Heissig et al, Tractata Altaica pp. 557–568. Cf also F. N. David, Games, Gods and Gambling p. 2.

      166

      Vladimirtsov Le regime social op. cit. p. 76; Pelliot & Hambis, Campagnes p. 232; Wittfogel & Feng, Liao p. 239.

      167

      Ratchnevsky, ‘La condition de la femme mongole au 12/13е siecle,’ in Heissig et al, Tractata Altaica pp. 509–530.

      168

      Togan, ‘The Qongrat in History/ in-Pfeiffer & Quinn, History and Historiography pp. 61–83; Pelliot & Hambis, Campagnes pp. 393, 402–405; Wittfogel & Feng, Liao pp. 92, 634.

      169

      SHC p. 15; SHW p. 243; Pelliot & Hambis, Campagnes pp. 423–429.

      170

      Togan, ‘The Qongrat in History/ p. 74.

      171

      Henry Serruys, ‘Two Remarkable Women in Mongolia,’ Asia Major 19 (1957) pp. 191–245.

      172

      Mostaert, Sur quelques passages pp. 10–12.

      173

      SHC p. 17.

      174

      Riasanovsky, Fundamental Principles p. 239.

      175

      Zhao, Marriage as Political Strategy p. 4.

      176

      SHR p. 14; Ratchnevsky, Genghis Khan p. 14. Dai Sechen’s dream was full of symbolism, especially as regards shading, since white was regarded as a lucky colour by the Mongols (Rachewiltz, Commentary p. 328).

      177

      Togan, Flexibility pp. 121–125.

      178

      L. V Clark, ‘The Theme of Revenge,’ pp. 33–57.

      179

      SHC p. 18.

      180

      Silvestre de Sacy, Chrestomathie arabe ii p. 162.

      181

      Ratchnevsky, Genghis Khan p. 22.

      182

      Rachewiltz, Commentary p. 344.

      183

      RT i p. 133.

      184

      Ratchnevsky, Genghis Khan p. 22.

      185

      May, Mongol Conquests p. 266.

      186

      SHC p. 22; Ratchnevsky, Genghis Khan pp. 20, 24.

      187

      Rachewiltz, Commentary pp. 346–347.

      188

      RT i p. 138.

Скачать книгу