Скачать книгу

and coworkers incorporated single‐stranded DNAs to detect target RNA molecules at the single‐molecule level on the surface of DNA origami (Figure 1.7a–c) [48]. Even though samples containing large amounts of cell‐derived RNAs were used, the binding of the target RNA could only be visualized by AFM, and nonspecific binding was not observed. Because DNA origami tiles carry different types of complementary DNAs and corresponding hairpin DNA markers, binding of target RNAs could be identified from the specific hairpin markers on the DNA origami even though the different origami tiles were mixed. In this study, the detection limit of RNA molecules was approximately 1000 molecules, meaning that the target RNA could be directly detected from a single cell without using polymerase chain reaction (PCR) amplification.

      1.6.2 Single‐Molecule Detection of Chemical Reactions

      Gothelf and coworkers detected selective bond cleavage and bond formation reactions on a DNA origami surface. Target molecules having specific reactivity were introduced at specific positions on DNA origami. Reductive cleavage of disulfide bonds and oxidative cleavage of an olefin by singlet oxygen were carried out on the DNA origami surface, and the reactions proceeded quantitatively at the single‐molecule level [49]. In addition, amide bond formation and click reactions were performed with 80–90% yield, and three successive reactions were also performed (Figure 1.7d,e). These chemical reactions were monitored by the cleavage of biotin‐attached chemical linkers and bond formation with biotin‐tethered functional groups, which can be labeled with streptavidin for visualization by AFM.

      1.6.3 Single‐Molecule Detection using Mechanical DNA Origami

      1.6.4 Single‐Molecule Sensing using Mechanical DNA Origami

Schematic illustration of detection of target RNA by hybridization with probe DNA strands introduced on the DNA origami.

      Source: Ke et al. [48]/with permission of American Association for the Advancement of Science.

      (d) Single chemical reaction on DNA origami. Reactive groups (azido, amino, and alkyne groups) were incorporated into the DNA origami by conjugation with staple DNA strands. The coupling reactions were then performed using the biotin‐attached functional groups. The completion of the reactions was visualized by the binding of streptavidin. (e) AFM images of the three individual reactions and three successive reactions by the treatment of three biotin‐attached functional groups. Yields are presented below the AFM images.

      Source: Voigt et al. [49]/with permission of Springer Nature.

Image described by caption.

      Source: Kuzuya et al. [50]/with permission of Springer Nature.

      (b) AFM images for streptavidin (SA) pinching by biotinylated DNA pliers. The dominant form of DNA pliers in Mg2+ solution before SA addition (left) was a cross. After SA addition (right), DNA pliers selectively pinched one SA tetramer and closed into the parallel closed form. Scale bars 300 nm.

      Source: Kuzuya et al. [50]/with permission of Springer Nature.

      (c) Mechanochemical sensing in optical tweezers using DNA origami nanostructures. A connected seven‐tile DNA origami with six probes is tethered between two optically trapped beads through dsDNA handles. Each tile has 39.5 nm × 27 nm in dimension. The adjacent tiles are locked (marked 1–6) by an aptamer DNA and its complementary strand. Unlocking of tiles by the target binding to an aptamer lock. (d) Real‐time observation of the target binding events in the constant‐force detection strategy. Upon switching to the target solution, the binding of the target unlocked the tiles, leading to the extension jumps (arrowheads).

      Source: Koirala et al. [51]/with permission of John Wiley & Sons, Inc.

      1.7.1 High‐Speed AFM‐Based Observation of Biomolecules

Скачать книгу