Скачать книгу

40 : 1 Continuous 81.7 [37] Castor oil Methanol 350 20 40 : 1 ~ 40 >99 [38] Ethanol Linseed oil Methanol 350 20 40 : 1 ~ 40 >99 Ethanol Ultrasound‐assisted biodiesel production Feedstock Solvent + catalyst Reaction temperature (°C) Reaction time (h) Catalyst concentration (%w/w) Alcohol:oil (ratio or %w/w) Sonication (kHz) Conversion/yield (%) References Waste cooking oil Dimethyl carbonate + Novozym 435 60 4 10 6 : 1 25 86.61 [39] Waste lard Candida antarctica lipase B 50 0.33 6 4 : 1 5 96.8 [40] Waste tallow Candida antarctica lipase B 27 0.33 6 4 : 1 5 85.6 [41] Microwave‐assisted biodiesel production Feedstock Catalyst Reaction temperature (°C) Reaction time (h) Catalyst concentration (%w/w) Alcohol:oil (ratio or %w/w) Power (W) Yield (%) References Waste cooking oil Sodium methoxide 27 0.05 0.75 6 : 1 750 97.9 [42] Waste cooking oil SrO/SiO2 65 0.41 0.75 12 : 1 242 99.2 [43] Waste cooking oil – Calophyllum inophyllum oil blend KOH 27 0.12 0.774 59.6 850 97.4 [44] Waste cooking oil H2SO4 27 6 0.5 9 : 1 800 92 [45]

      2.5.2.2 Microwave Irradiation

      Compared with conventional processes, the dispersion of generated heat is thus rapid, facilitating very high conversion rates and drastically reducing required time and energy [49]. However, slight disadvantages exist since presence of solids greatly disrupts the microwave penetration, resulting in irregular diffusion and reactivity. Also volatile compounds pose greater risks when exposed to microwaves compared to uniform heating due to rapid heat generation [50]. This process has been successfully applied in both fed‐batch and continuous processes, as listed in Table 2.3.

      2.5.2.3 Ultrasonication