Скачать книгу

Adding an iron yoke helps channel the flux into a closed circuit and can provide mechanical support for the two disks (which otherwise want to come together). This is the basic configuration of many commercial 0.2–0.35-T “low-field open” MRI systems, which reached a peak in popularity in the early 1990s. The “open” patient space reduced claustrophobia anxieties at a time when superconducting solenoid systems were quite long and narrow bore (55 cm diameter as opposed to the current norm of 70 cm diameter). In many ways, low-field open systems remain a reasonable choice for emergency MR, but their size and weight are comparable with 1.5-T superconducting systems, requiring a similar siting footprint. The Hyperfine 64-mT portable MRI system [36] appears to follow this geometry, as does a 0.2-T portable system mounted in a mini-van for elbow imaging at baseball games [16]. The direction of the B0 field differs from their superconducting cousins. The superconducting solenoid imposes B0 in the “head–foot” direction, while low-field open systems usually have a posterior to anterior (vertical) B0. It has been noted that the accompanying change in radiofrequency field geometry for low-field open geometry systems yields a reduced interaction with deep-brain stimulation leads (and lower radiofrequency heating) [106].

      3.5.1.5 Halbach Arrays for Portable MRI

      Figure 3.7 Halbach arrays of permanent magnets. Phasing the magnetization from 0 to 4π provides a magnetic dipole with a uniform transverse field inside. Higher-order modes can be obtained by varying the angle to other multiples of 2π. Top left shows the ideal continuous magnetization distribution. Top middle uses key-stone shaped pieces. Top right shows square cross-section pieces, which are readily commercially available. Bottom left shows the possibility of using multiple cubes of differing Br, chosen to optimize a desired field pattern. The bottom middle takes better advantage of the head geometry by using a portion of a Halbach sphere. The bottom right shows a section of a Halbach sphere used in the “MR Cap” of Figure 3.3.

      The field inside an ideal cylindrical Halbach array (e.g. Figure 3.7, top left) of inner radius ra and outer radius rb is given by B = Br ln(rb/ra), where Br is the remanence of the material used. Thus, for a human head system with rb/ra = 50 cm/30 cm and Br = 1.4 T, we can expect a field of B0 = 0.72 T in this ideal structure. For a whole-body system with rb/ra = 120 cm/80 cm, B0 = 0.56 T. If the cylinder length is not infinite, but equal to its outer diameter, the estimated weight of rare-earth material for these two systems would be 1500 kg and 18 000 kg – not exactly lightweight. Achieving realistic weights for POC systems necessitates reducing the field, typically to below 0.1 T for adult human imaging systems.

      3.5.1.6 Other Types of Permanent Magnet Arrays

      3.5.2 Other Technological Challenges

      While a suitably compact magnet design constitutes one of the primary challenges to achieving the easy-to-site suite, portable brain MRI, or MR brain monitor discussed, additional technical challenges arise as the system deviates from the canonical high-field system design. Issues include trying to image in a more inhomogeneous field and trying to operate an MRI scanner without the “shielded room” Faraday cage that attenuates external EMI. As mentioned earlier, relaxing the homogeneity constraint benefits compact magnet design and eliminating the shielded room requires an alternative passive or active EMI mitigation strategy.

      3.5.2.1 Image Encoding in an Inhomogeneous Field

Скачать книгу