Скачать книгу

is investigated with numerical simulations (CST Studio, Frequency Domain Solver), in the case of a disk whose first TE mode is located at 732 MHz (Eigenmode Solver of CST Studio). It was first checked that the excited mode was the TE01δ mode: the magnetic field longitudinal component coincides in each configuration with the total magnetic field amplitude along the disk symmetry axis. As can be observed in Figure 2.11, the resonance frequency is slightly increased by the loop. The left column of Figure 2.11 shows that the maximum magnetic field at the center of the disk coincides with the minimum loop reflection coefficient, meaning the input power of the loop is transferred to the resonant mode of the disk. Also, but not shown in this figure, there exists an optimal loop diameter maximizing the magnetic field amplitude.

      Figure 2.11 Influence on (left) the reflection coefficient S11 (minimum value), the magnetic field amplitude (maximum value) at the center of the resonator, and (right) the corresponding frequency of the feeding loop position relative to the dielectric disk (relative permittivity 530, loss tangent 8.10−4, diameter 18 mm, height 10 mm). (a) Varying lateral position. (b) Varying longitudinal position. There is an optimal position of the feeding loop with a minimum reflection coefficient, and a maximum transmitted power to the resonant mode.

      In the model proposed above (Section 2.3) for estimating the contribution of the ceramic probe to the SNR, the contribution of the feeding loop is neglected. In fact, this contribution depends on the loop’s geometry and material. For the geometry in Figure 2.11 and the considered probe prototype, the probe efficiency was compared for a lossy copper loop and an ideal loop in a perfect electric conductor; the difference was less than 0.2% between the two values.

      Figure 2.12 Experimental setup. Fixing the resonant frequency at the Larmor frequency is enabled by thermostating the resonator at a given temperature (left). Matching is performed by sliding the excitation loop (right). With permission from [30].

      Figure 2.13 Temperature dependence of the ceramic relative permittivity and therefore of the probe resonant frequency. With permission from [30].

      2.4.2 Performance

      The ceramic probe designed in [30] was experimentally compared to the reference probe, which is a solenoid coil optimally designed for the same required field of view.

      Figure 2.14 Measured transmit field pattern in a homogeneous liquid phantom for the reference optimal solenoid probe with Fluorinert (top) and for the designed ceramic (bottom), at 17.2 T. Data from [30].

      Figure 2.15 Experimental comparison of the designed ceramic probe and the reference optimal solenoid at 17 T. (Left) signal and noise maps measured in a homogeneous tissue-mimicking liquid phantom. (Right) microscopy images obtained with both probes; (first line) Ilex aquifolium fruit; (second line) chemically fixed rat spinal cord; (third line) 3D rendering and image slice of a plant petiole (obtained with the ceramic probe). With permission from [30].

      Better performance of the ceramic probe can be observed in Figure 2.15 (right panel): microscopy images obtained with this probe demonstrate improved quality compared with those obtained using the reference probe, since more structural details can be distinguished.

      2.4.3 Dual Ceramic Coils

Скачать книгу