Скачать книгу

climate change adaptation strategies.

      1.5.1 Ecosystem Services

      1.5.2 Plant Adaptations

      Not all the species are sensitive to the higher temperature and drought conditions, as some of the species may escape these extreme conditions by developing resilience and adaptations. In a study on species distribution under varying ranges of the European regions, Lososová et al. (2018) reported that about 45% of species do not show any direct relationship with the geographical distribution and climatic conditions. Thus, with the ongoing climate change, several species have been expected to decline, whereas some other species (particularly alien) which showed resilience to the climate change may spread, particularly in the European urban ecosystems. In other words, the space/niches created due to the decline of a species would be filled up by those species which have the tendency to cope‐up with the increased temperature and drought conditions (Lososová et al. 2018). The fast‐growing annuals (herbs) respond more quickly to the environmental changes as compared to the perennial herbs and woody vegetation (Grime 2001), thus these species may have wider distribution ranges in the future. The ruderal life strategy, production of large number of seeds/propagules and self‐pollination traits help the annual herbs to track the environmental changes more quickly (Aarssen 1998; Lososová et al. 2018). Therefore, they are considered as the key indicators of the ongoing climate change. Further, the dominance of plants using the C4 photosynthetic pathway has also been reported from the urban regions as compared to the non‐urban regions of the European countries (Duffy and Chown 2016). It is expected that the C4 plant species have more adaptive capacity to the localised warming conditions created by the UHI effects in the European regions which can be a strategy for the shift in future vegetation cover in these regions with the climate change (Duffy and Chown 2016). Such type of studies related to the species composition and climate change adaptation are needed from the tropical regions of the world as well.

      1.5.3 Green Infrastructure

      1.5.3.1 Green Space Development

      Urban greening programmes are the leading features of the policies related to the climate change mitigation (Weissert et al. 2014). In view of ongoing climate change, potential research and management emphasis has been given to identifying the impacts of socio‐demographic and environmental drivers on green spaces and the benefits derived from their conservation (Niemelä 2014; Verma et al. 2020c). The key tangible ecosystem services derived from the green spaces include mitigation of air pollution and UHI effect as well as physical and physiological health benefits to the residents (Verma et al. 2020b; Wang et al. 2020). Cooling effect provided by the green spaces is the most important ecosystem service which helps in mitigating UHI effect (Yu et al. 2017). The cooling effect of green spaces has been extensively explored by several researchers which involve two eco‐physiological mechanisms viz. evapotranspiration and shadowing (Jiao et al. 2017; Wang et al. 2020). Size and characteristics (shape, structure, and composition/configuration) of green space is more important for cooling effect as it increases with increasing size of the green spaces (Jaganmohan et al. 2016; Yu et al. 2017); however, it is still controversial and several other factors come into the play (Monteiro et al. 2016). However, there is a threshold value of efficiency (TVoE) above which increase in vegetation cover may not lead to a consequent decrease in land surface temperature (Bao et al. 2016; Yu et al. 2017). Tree‐based green spaces showed the highest cooling effect followed by bush and grassland (Kong et al. 2014). Since the canopy size and structure vary with the tree species, they provide different wind speed patterns which resulted in variable cooling effects (Armson et al. 2012). In addition, different trees have different eco‐physiological mechanisms (e.g. evapotranspiration and leaf area index) which depend on the resource availability and management practices (Wang et al. 2020). Kuang et al. (2015) observed a positive correlation between the cooling effect of green space and normalised difference vegetation index (NDVI). In addition, the presence of water bodies along with the green spaces improve the cooling effect. For example, green spaces connected with water bodies showed higher cooling effect, whereas grassland‐based green spaces showed weak cooling effect (Yang et al. 2020). Therefore, for climate change mitigation, interconnected green space and water body conservation and development are strongly suggested (Yu et al. 2017).

Скачать книгу