LITMIR.BIZ

      Lyman had sworn he’d never marry a weak woman, though Roxanna’s Episcopal religion — against which Lyman waged a lifelong war — must have given him pause. After a brief courtship, Lyman asked if she would marry him. In response, she mentioned their religious differences and the fact that he was still in school. Undeterred, he told her he intended to continue his visits with an eye on marriage, and Roxana — as she told him later — consented because she never thought the relationship would amount to much. At one point, Lyman seems to have agreed with her, and he came to the family’s Guilford home, Nut Plains, prepared to end the problematic relationship. But Roxanna, perhaps sensing a breakup, began to cry and he wasn’t able to tell her why he’d come — and he never did. He did, however, send her books to read that might convince her of the errors of her theology. In turn, Roxanna wrote impassioned letters asking for her beloved’s help in finding the defects in her prayer life.¹⁵

      Later, as Lyman aged and began to slip into dementia, his son Charles read him snippets of the letters he’d written to Roxanna so long ago and saved. As Charles read, occasionally Lyman interrupted him and said, “Who is that fellow? He’s all wrong.” When Charles told his father he was reading Lyman’s love letters to Roxanna, Lyman stopped a moment, then said, “Well, I was an ignoramus, but if I had him and her in one of my inquiry meetings, I could have set them all right in half an hour.”¹⁶

      They married on a rainy September 19, 1799, and with Roxanna at his side, Lyman Beecher set out to spread his influence by writing sermons that lit on the topics of the day. A series of sermons against dueling in 1806 was delivered in response to the death-by-dueling of former secretary of treasury Alexander Hamilton at the hand of Vice President Aaron Burr.

      But it was a sermon Lyman gave in 1807 in East Hampton, New York, and later delivered at a larger church meeting in Newark, that placed him firmly in the public eye. Remember, this was a time when the leading thinkers of the day were not politicians, but ministers, and sermons were reprinted as booklets and in newspapers and circulated widely. Beecher’s first popular sermon, “The Government of God Desirable,” was favorably compared with the work of the storied Jonathan Edwards, whose 1741 sermon “Sinners in the Hands of an Angry God” was supposed to have moved his congregation to “tears and convulsions.”¹⁷ Printed, Lyman’s sermon ran twenty-seven pages and ended with the warning, “But rebel, and still he will reign, still he will bless his kingdom, but he will exclude you, forever, from its holy joys.”¹⁸

      It’s not a modern-day page-turner, but this was Christian orthodoxy at its most raw, and it would make Lyman Beecher as much a household name as possible in the days before mass communication — “a Puritan of the Puritans,” according to his son Henry Ward.¹⁹

      But Lyman was restless, and he and Roxanna and their growing family — Catharine born in 1800, William Henry in 1802, Edward a year later, and Mary two years after him — could not live on Lyman’s $400 a year. Roxanna would prove a practical balance to the high-strung Lyman by taking in boarders, but when that didn’t meet the family’s financial needs, she opened a school and taught English and French. Lyman’s growing influence caught the attention of Congregationalists in Litchfield, Connecticut, and the family soon settled in the Litchfield Hills in a large and drafty home that was the frequent stop of wayfarers and teachers intent on taking advantage of a poor minister’s largesse.

      The move’s timing could not have been better. With world-class educational institutions, Litchfield was a vibrant, changeable town. For a short time between 1790 and 1830, all roads passed — or seemed to — through Litchfield.

      The two main educational institutions in Litchfield — one a law school and the other one of the country’s rare schools for young women — were part of a shift in America from an agrarian culture to one centered in urban areas and small towns. The shift to a mercantile society helped spread capital to families that heretofore had scant opportunity — other than marrying into it — to amass wealth. You either owned a farm or you didn’t.

      The shift also broadened the opportunities for education, making books and the advancement of knowledge not so much the enclave of the wealthy and the clergy but also open to anyone with access to a newspaper or book.²⁰ At the same time, the shift to a more mechanized society and a more urban environment made the enforcement of the country’s slave economy more difficult.²¹

      Those were the positive results of the modernization of the U.S. economy, but for every winner, there is a loser. Railroads might make travel more convenient, but they destroyed previously untouched vistas. Factories increased productivity, but they polluted the streams. Material wealth that had been unimagined outside of royal families rewarded a choice few — and consigned the losers to slums equally unimaginable.

      With the shift came an even sharper division between the worlds of women and men. On a farm, chores were unending, and rare was the family that would begrudge an extra pair of hands in the fields — whether those hands were male or female. Not so in a mercantile society. To fulfill economic roles, the world was splitting in two, with, in general, women assigned the indoor tasks and men assigned the rest. That is not as much an overstatement as it might appear. The attitude of taming a wilderness — the new country of America — was being replaced by a desire for more order, starting with the home front. For the first time in the country’s short history, the feminine role was shrinking.

      Lyman’s spiritual ancestors had come to the colonies with a mania for salvation equaled only by their disdain for royal rule. Their love of a heavenly king far trumped their embrace of an earthly one — and their worship began with discipline of self.²² The same way women of Isabella’s generation would be told they could rule the world by ruling their homes, the Puritans believed they could usher in a godly world by focusing on eradicating their own foibles. This rigorous self-examination shows up in the austerity in paintings and sculptures that portrayed the Puritans as possessing “rock-ribbed integrity.”²³ Throughout Isabella’s life, the imagined simplicity and integrity of Puritan family

Скачать книгу