LITMIR.BIZ

      Settler’s cabin between Halifax and Windsor as seen from a train in June 1867, a watercolour-over-pencil by Juliana Horatia Ewing. She wrote, “They begin by setting fire to the under-wood, which clears the way to the felling of trees. The result is that a cleared place like this is covered with charred stumps of pines and many of the pines lie full length, being I suppose too much burnt to be worth removal.” (Mcdonald, Illustrated News, 34–35.)

      When they emigrated, the English left very few newspaper records or personal letters behind. Their exodus also escaped the notice of most contemporary commentators and later English historians. Their departure was treated with less disquiet by people in authority than was the case with the Scots. Nobody seemed to care about the diminution in England’s workforce and armed services. And after they arrived at their chosen destinations, the religious ministers who served them seemed unusually disinterested in their cultural and social needs. Anglican missionaries, appointed by the London-based Society for the Propagation of the Gospel, did not see it as their job to offer a cultural lifeline in the way that Roman Catholic priests did for the Irish or Presbyterian missionaries did for the Scots. They rarely mentioned individual English settlements in their twice-yearly reports. Although Methodist missionaries had closer links with ordinary settlers, they hardly ever described their communities, unlike Presbyterian clergymen, who wrote lengthy accounts of Scottish pioneering activities. Thus, the English were overlooked as they left and widely ignored after they arrived.

      And yet, by 1865, by which time Canada had acquired well over a million people from Britain, the majority of the immigrants were coming from England.¹⁵ However, relatively few of the English actually settled in Atlantic Canada, with most preferring to go to the United States, Upper and Lower Canada, and the Prairies.¹⁶

      Of great importance to this study is what happened a century earlier, when Atlantic Canada acquired thousands of people with English ancestry from the United States. The driving force behind this influx was Britain’s defence interests. Facing ongoing hostilities with France, Britain was concerned that the French-speaking Acadians living in Nova Scotia might side with France in any future conflicts. It therefore took the unprecedented and brutal step of expelling some thirteen thousand Acadians in two separate deportations carried out in 1755 and 1758.¹⁷ And to assist the process of colonization even further, the hunting and fishing territories of the Native peoples were also seized.¹⁸

      This ethnic cleansing paved the way for the arrival of eight thousand New England Planters,¹⁹ all of whom could trace their ancestral roots back to England. Given generous incentives by the British government to relocate to the Maritimes, and being enticed by its good agricultural land, they arrived between 1759 and 1762, primarily from Massachusetts, Connecticut, and Rhode Island. The second group, consisting of thirtyfive thousand Loyalists, came in 1784–85 from the United States, many originating from New York and New Jersey. Having suffered defeat in the American War of Independence and fearing a further loss of territory to the United States, the British government had financed their removal costs and placed them along both sides of the strategically important Bay of Fundy.²⁰ These Loyalists, many of English descent, swelled the population of the Nova Scotia peninsula and gave the newly created province of New Brunswick an instant population. Planters and Loyalists, together with their descendents, dominated the population of Nova Scotia and New Brunswick for many decades, but, with the rapidly growing influx directly from Britain after 1815, the British component of the population eventually became even larger, although the exact numbers are unknown. Eventually two types of English came to be recognized in the region. There were the American-born, having distant English ancestry, and there were those whose ancestors, or they themselves, had emigrated directly from England.

      Reading the order of expulsion to the Acadians gathered in the parish church of Grand Pré in the Annapolis Valley of Nova Scotia, 1775. Watercolour by C.W. Jefferys (1869–1951).

      Planters and Loyalists brought their Yankee ways with them and were, first and foremost, Americans. They were fiercely independently minded, built American-style houses, and favoured the nonconformist religions that were popular in the United States. Their family links were with the United States and not with England. Yet, when asked to state their ethnic origins in 1871, they defined themselves as English, however distant that connection was.²¹ As a result, some 29 percent of the population in both Nova Scotia and New Brunswick were categorized as English. The customs and shipping data, although incomplete, reveal that both provinces attracted relatively few English immigrants during the first half of the nineteenth century, with Scottish arrivals being more significant in Nova Scotia and Irish arrivals dominating much of the influx to New Brunswick. Thus, the substantial English presence, revealed by the census, owes more to its eighteenth-century antecedents than to the later arrival of emigrants directly from England.

      Meanwhile, Prince Edward Island, which had no Planters and very few Loyalists, had to acquire its English directly from England, giving its population a relatively low English component of only 20 percent by 1881. On the other hand, Newfoundland, which relied almost entirely on West Country fishermen to bolster its early immigrant population, ended up as Canada’s most English province. The 1991 census records that a staggering 82 percent of the population claimed to have some English ancestry, although most of the influx occurred long before Newfoundland had officially recorded immigration statistics.²²

      The emigrants who came from England to settle in Atlantic Canada were driven primarily by a desire for economic self-betterment. Some were fleeing dreadful poverty, but most had positive motives for leaving, with many seeking the ultimate prize of owning land and the independence that went with it. Paradoxically, emigration increased with the rapid rise in England’s industrial output. Because machines increasingly replaced people, thousands of agricultural labourers working on the land and tradesmen in traditional jobs like handloom weaving had been displaced from their jobs. An oversupply of labour led to pitiful wage rates and chronic unemployment levels. The upheaval caused by the introduction of large commercial farms on Yorkshire estates during the eighteenth century fuelled the exodus from this one region. Rather than endure higher rents and an uncertain future, the Yorkshire tenantry immigrated to Nova Scotia. They were the largest single group to leave, but, generally-speaking, most settlers came as families, usually in small numbers, and were drawn from many parts of England and from every social class. Most could afford to emigrate unaided, and they considered the opportunities available in various destinations very critically before deciding where they would finally settle.

Map 1. Reference Map of England.

      Although each of the four Atlantic provinces has its own individual story, their emigration sagas have some common threads. In each case a significant component of the English influx had been driven by longestablished trade links with the southwest of England. This one region supplied

Скачать книгу