Скачать книгу

sociotechnical paradigm related to bioeconomy topics is based on the assumption that biomass resources can be used to reduce dependence on fossil‐based resources, revitalize rural economies, ensure energy security, mitigate climate change, and provide environmental services [159]. In the previous sections, we saw how industrial crops can tolerate and provide remediation for a variety of soil/environmental conditions. Once produced in such environmental/physical conditions, biomass can be used for the economic revitalization of marginal lands [160].

      Ecological engineering encompasses a variety of physical and chemical remediation technologies and, together with ecosystem engineering technologies such as bioremediation, dendroremediation, mycoremediation, and phytoremediation (and associated technologies), can be successfully applied to modify, restore, maintain, and/or (re‐)create functional ecosystems on marginal and degraded land. The joint application of approaches can result in more effective land recovery and restoration than using them separately.

      Together with ecological engineering approaches, ecosystem engineering and, specifically, phytoremediation can further reduce soil constraints and promote the development of ecological functions. Under soil‐cracking conditions, introducing perennial energy crops can accelerate the decomposition of organic matter available in soil (incorporated, for example, via biosolids and other organic amendments), increasing soil aeration and fertility. These perennial crops can stabilize the soil's physical structure and promote soil organic carbon storage. They can also adapt to a variety of clay textures and promote the balance between water and gases in different soil types, including stony soil. This can be an essential aspect of soil management and restoration, especially for soils prone to drought and affected by salinization. Other industrial crops like V. zizanoides, sorghum, giant reed, and perennial ryegrass can also promote soil remediation given waterlogging or cold conditions, showing high tolerance to a huge range of environmental conditions. Many of the perennial crops used for bioenergy purposes produce high yields and fast growth at the same time, which can stimulate fungal and microorganism communities that help restore physical and chemical constraints in soils. In sloping areas, perennial crops like giant reed, switchgrass, Miscanthus spp., and P. purpureum can reinforce soil aggregates and provide support, increasing cohesive and adhesive forces and reducing susceptibility to erosion and landslides. The same crops can remove and immobilize the toxicological effect of heavy metals, other salts, and inorganic and emergent contaminants that reach the soil environment, providing a very efficient and cheap means to restore soil and improve soil conditions for the development of soil microorganisms, fungi, and other soil biota while also generating biomass for the bioeconomy (bioenergy, fiber, and other bio‐products).

      1 1 Shortall, O.K. (2013). “Marginal land” for energy crops: exploring definitions and embedded assumptions. Energ Policy 62: 19–27.

      2 2 Tve, A.M., Robinson, D.A., and Lark, R.M. (2013). Gradual and anthropogenic soil change for fertility and carbon on marginal sandy soils. Geoderma 207–208: 35–48.

      3 3 Nsanganwimana, F., Pourrut, B., Mench, M., and Douay, F. (2014). Suitability of Miscanthus species for managing inorganic and organic contaminated land and restoring ecosystem services. A review. J. Environ. Manage. 143: 123–134.

      4 4 Sheoran, V., Sheoran, A.S., and Poonam, P. (2008). Remediation techniques for contaminated soils. Environ. Eng. Manag. J. 7: 379–387.

      5 5 Changfeng, L., Kehai, Z., Wenqiang, Q. et al. (2019). A review on heavy metals contamination in soil: effects, sources, and remediation techniques. Soil Sediment Contam. 28: 380–394.

      6 6 Guo, J., Muhammad, H., Lv, X. et al. (2020). Prospects and applications of plant growth promoting rhizobacteria to mitigate soil metal contamination: a review. Chemosphere 246: 125823.

      7 7 Qayyum, S., Khan, I., Meng, K. et al. (2020). A review on remediation technologies for heavy metals contaminated soil. Cent. Asian J. Environ. Sci. Technol. Innov. 1: 21–29.

      8 8 Wan, X., Lei, M., and Chen, T. (2020). Review on remediation technologies for arsenic‐contaminated soil. Front. Environ. Sci. Eng. 14: 24.

      9 9 Kang, S., Post, W., Wang, D. et al. (2013). Hierarchical marginal land assessment for land use planning. Land Use Policy 30: 106–113.

      10 10 Terres, J.M., Hagyo, A., Wania, A. (2014). Scientific contribution on combining biophysical criteria underpinning the delineation of agricultural areas affected by specific constraints: Methodology and factsheets for plausiblecriteria combinations. In “JRC Scientific and Technical Reports”, Publications Office of the European Union, Brussels, Belgium.

      11 11 Awet, T.T., Kohl, Y., Meier, F. et al. (2018). Effects of polystyrene nanoparticles on the microbiota and functional diversity of enzymes in soil. Environ. Sci. Eur. 30: 11.

      12 12 Rillig, M.C., Lehmann, A., Souza‐Machado, A.A., and Yang, G. (2019). Microplastic effects on plants. New Phytol. 223: 1066–1070.

      13 13 Lewandowski, I. (2015). Securing a sustainable biomass supply in a growing bioeconomy. Glob. Food Secur. 6: 34–42.

      14 14 Mehemood, M.A., Ibrahim, M., Rashid, U. et al. (2016). Biomass production for bioenergy using marginal lands. Sustain. Prod. Consum. 9: 3–21.

      15 15 Berisso, F.E., Schjønning, P., Keller, T. et al. (2012). Persistent effects of subsoil compaction on pore size distribution and gas transport in a loamy soil. Soil Tillage Res. 122: 42–51.

      16 16 Ahmadi, S.H., Plauborg, F., Andersen, M.N. et al. (2011). Effects of irrigation strategies and soils on field grown potatoes: root distribution. Agric. Water Manag.

Скачать книгу