Скачать книгу

that they’re out there. I visited them. I talked with them. And I believe that we can – we must – learn from them.

      They are not Pollyannaish. They are not impervious to discouragement. They are not flawless.

      But they are hopeful, they are driven, and they are countercultural.

      They are bridge builders.

      Bridge builders are people like Eboo Patel.

      About a quarter century ago, racial tension was high following the police beating of Rodney King, the O. J. Simpson trial, and what Patel called “the emergence of identity politics on college campuses.” “It wasn’t as politically divided” as things are today, “but it was socially divided in a variety of ways,” he said.

      For a while, Patel was immersed in the divisiveness. “I spent a couple of years angry,” he said. “And then frankly I developed some perspective and maturity and judgment. Along the way, I discovered religion.”

      Patel’s personal journey gave him the conviction that “religion can be a bunker of isolation, it can be a barrier of division, it can be a bludgeon of domination, or it can be a bridge of cooperation.”

      That led him in the late 1990s to form the Interfaith Youth Core (IFYC) to promote conversation, relationships, and cooperation among college students from different religious backgrounds. Today, the nonprofit provides training, organizes volunteer outings, and offers curricula on interfaith issues. By April 2020, IFYC had established a presence on more than 600 campuses throughout the country with about 100,000 student participants.25

      Patel has advocated for higher-education leaders to allay marginalization and sniping among evangelical Christians, atheists, and Muslims by integrating “conversations about religious diversity” into “first-year orientation, required courses, and policies that affect campus climate.”26

      Patel said we can learn lessons from the apolitical nature of everyday life, which functions smoothly in spite of the things that divide us. “In our civil society, we naturally come together with people who are quite different from us politically, racially, religiously, to do cooperative things,” he said. “When’s the last time you heard about doctors in a hospital refusing to perform a heart surgery because they voted differently or because they were a different race? So the fiber of American life in a civic sense promotes cooperation. I think this is a big, big deal.”

      Building bridges between people from different walks of life demands a different perspective on the same circumstances that cause others to feel divided. It requires a commitment to the development of authentic relationships, the use of dynamic communication techniques, and a realization that service opportunities break down social, cultural, and political barriers. It calls for a recognition that an attitude of inclusion is a hallmark of successful bridge building – and that exclusion, insults, and shame corrode the paths to social justice.

      “The people who have made the most social change have been the ones who tell an inspiring story that draws a larger circle, that draws people in,” Patel said. “Building a diverse democracy is about three things. It’s really about engaging with the deep problem of marginalization, it’s about bridging polarization, and it’s about being able to handle deep disagreements.” Some of those disagreements are “rooted in deep and fundamental identities,” he said. And those identities must be honored, reimagined, or even confronted, depending on the circumstances.

      When Morrison talks about our nation’s history of systemic racism – and how White Christians, in particular, have fueled social injustice – she is showing them how someone who reads the same Bible and prays to the same God has been afflicted by White privilege and White supremacy. What she asks of them is to “lament” the past, to learn about it, and to apply lessons from it to their lives. “The type of bridge we’re building is one that uplifts marginalized voices,” she said. “We’re truth-tellers – that’s one of our values.”

      As a result, Morrison chooses to engage with people of difference who haven’t yet figured it out. They can be rough around the edges, but if they’ve signaled a willingness to engage, she’s in. “We give each other grace because there’s going to be times when I need grace,” she said. “Sometimes people are going to need grace to be ignorant and to ask a stupid question. I feel like no one gets this by yelling or demeaning them. So I think it’s important that we do this with grace, we do this with love and truth. We want to see justice.”

      “Am I doing something to tear you down? Or am I just saying some things that make you uncomfortable?” Morrison asked. “There’s a difference. Am I attacking you as an individual, or am I telling the truth about a system of brokenness that we’ve ingested? It just really takes some discernment, and we can’t go off of feelings. Sometimes we need time to process this.” Calling people out for the sake of embarrassing them is often counterproductive, she said, because it’s “about demeaning and not bringing solutions.” It often brings about the opposite reaction that is desired. Yet it’s critical to ensure that people aren’t being silenced for the sake of creating an edifice of civility, which simply triggers identity corrosion underneath the surface. “It causes trauma when we isolate and oppress people, when they can’t use their voice,” Morrison said. “For centuries here in this country, that has happened where, if you spoke out or complained or if you called out, you would die. . . . I want to challenge people to have a different perspective, to learn from someone’s different experience.”

Скачать книгу