Скачать книгу

cultures. Makerspace networks provide people with skills and access to versatile design and fabrication technologies, as well as traditional hand‐tools; and they provide social spaces that foster communities who share an open and collaborative ethos interested in the possibilities that democratized design and fabrication technologies might offer personally, socially, economically and culturally. However, as well as being spaces of creative and transformational possibility, makerspaces also experience many of the tensions of our current conjuncture. Some makerspaces have become synonymous with neoliberal business‐as‐usual, where a kind of entrepreneurial citizenship is prototyped through the exploitation of precarious labor by businesses and institutions. Peer production in makerspaces sits in tension with pressures to enclose, commodify, and compete to provide profitable inputs into global manufacturing circuits. This chapter explores the dynamics of makerspaces as spaces of possibility, tension, post‐automation, and liberation, examining in particular how institutional encounters prompt makerspaces to interpret, reinforce, and challenge prevailing socio‐technical regimes in society.

      27 Peer Production and State Theory: Envisioning a Cooperative Partner State

       Alex Pazaitis & Wolfgang Drechsler

      28 Making a Case for Peer Production: Interviews with Peter Bloom, Mariam Mecky, Ory Okolloh, Abraham Taherivand, & Stefano Zacchiroli

      Peer production is first and foremost a practical affair. In these interviews, practitioners involved in setting up, developing, and maintaining diverse peer‐production projects share their experiences and insights: Peter Bloom talks about the Rhizomatica project, Mariam Mecky speaks about the endeavor to create HarassMap; Ory Okolloh reflects on Ushahidi; Abraham Taherivand discusses the role of Wikimedia, and Stefano Zacchiroli provides insights into the Debian FOSS community.

      29 What’s Next? Peer Production Studies?

       Mathieu O’Neil, Sophie Toupin, & Christian Pentzold

      This chapter re‐examines the dual contribution of peer production to productive efficiency and social justice. We first interrogate each of these concepts’ potential for future research. Next, the chapter reflexively evaluates peer production as an object of study by mapping a network of peer‐production researchers and by considering whether a field of “peer production studies” has emerged, as well as how such a field is structured. The questions that animate this chapter are: How should we think about peer production? How are other people thinking about it? What is it good for, in analytical terms, exactly? Should peer production become a field of study?

      30 Be Your Own Peer! Principles and Proposals for the Commons

       Mathieu O’Neil, Sophie Toupin, & Christian Pentzold

      At the heart of peer production lies the impulse to take control of one’s life and produce something independently of the authority of social and professional hierarchies. This is also a deeply moral impulse, as the fruits of one’s labor are meant to be shared with others: the commons are both the resource being produced and the means to produce it. In this way peer production challenges the dominant societal model based on the solitary consumption of perishable items which are always produced somewhere else. Peer production is therefore organically connected to issues such as sustainable development, the re‐localization of the economy, and “degrowth.” This final chapter builds on the conceptual breakthroughs discussed in the Handbook of Peer Production to reflect on the existential import of peer production as a set of alternative ethical life‐choices. It sets out to define legal, economic, and policy initiatives required to grow the commons. Readers are presented with practical suggestions to shape the future by collaborating with others to create common goods.

Part I Introduction

      Mathieu O’Neil, Sophie Toupin, and Christian Pentzold

Скачать книгу