Скачать книгу

in problem size leads to a significant bottleneck in scaling the existing DNA computing procedures for large size problem formulations. This is primarily because the amount of DNA required increases exponentially with size even though the number of biochemical steps required increases with a polynomial function. Further, there is a significant compounding of experimental errors involved, which makes these procedures redundant for solving the bigger size formulations. Also, the real‐life problems often have continuous search spaces and multiple optimal solutions, whereas the existing DNA computing procedures are mostly developed for discrete search spaces involving a single optimal solution.

      In 1994, Adleman [2] used the DNA for computation in the first‐ever molecular experiment performed to solve the HPP. Molecular biology experiments were performed to address the instance graph having seven vertices and fourteen edges. A year later, Lipton [3] presented a new model for solving another NP‐complete (nondeterministic polynomial time complete) problem known as satisfiability (SAT) problem using a DNA computer. SAT problem is also solved by Smith et al. [4] and Liu et al. [6] with new surface‐based DNA computing models.

      Along with these models, other researchers [7,11,12] also solved NP‐complete problems with a different approach. Sakamoto et al. [5] used DNA hairpin formation to solve the SAT problem. Chao et al. [13] developed a single‐molecule “DNA navigator” to solve a maze. These models of DNA computing are discussed in the next section.

      2.2.1 Adleman Model

Image described by caption.

      2.2.2 Lipton's Model

Скачать книгу