LITMIR.BIZ

      1 1.1 Dibenzylmercury (PhCH2)2Hg contains linear C─Hg─C bonds. At 140 °C the compound undergoes thermal decomposition to give 1,2‐diphenylethane PhCH2CH2Ph and mercury. Suggest a concerted mechanism and a stepwise mechanism for this reaction.

      2 1.2 The following are two alternative mechanisms for the AlCl3 catalyzed Friedel–Crafts reaction of benzene with chloroethane. Show qualitative reaction profiles for both mechanisms. Which mechanism is more plausible? Explain.

      3 1.3 The decomposition of bromoethane in gaseous phase to ethene and hydrogen bromide follows a first‐order rate law. Suggest a possible concerted and a stepwise mechanisms which are consistent with the rate law.

      4 1.4 The rate of nitration of benzene in a mixture of nitric acid and sulfuric acid does not depend on the concentration of benzene. What conclusion can be drawn from this? Show qualitative energy profile for the stepwise reaction.

      5 1.5 The mechanism for the autoxidation of hydrocarbons by oxygen is shown below:Apply the steady‐state approximation to work out the expected kinetics for the reaction.

      6 1.6 For the SN1 solvolysis of the tertiary chloroalkanes R–Cl in ethanol at 25°C, the relative rates for three different chloroalkanes are 1, 1.2, and 18.4 for R = Me3C, tBuMe2C, and tBu2MeC, respectively. Is the difference due to electronic or steric effects? Explain. Draw qualitative energy profiles for the SN1 solvolysis of the three chloroalkanes.

      7 1.7 For the following each pair of anions, compare their basicity and nucleophilicity. Account for the difference.(1) OH− and SH− (2) CH3COO− and C6H5COO−

      8 1.8 Which of the following SN2 reactions goes faster? Explain by kinetic isotope effect.

      1 1. Jackson, R. A. Mechanisms in Organic Reactions, The Royal Society of Chemistry, Cambridge, UK (2004).

      2 2. Silbey, R. J.; Alterty, R. A.; Bawendi, M. G. Physical Chemistry, 4th ed., Wiley, Danvers, MA, USA (2005).

      3 3. Hoffman, R. V. Organic Chemistry: An Intermediate Text, 2nd ed., Wiley, Hoboken, NJ, USA (2004).

      4 4. Huheey, J. E.; Keiter, E. A.; Keiter, R. L. Inorganic Chemistry: Principles of Structure and Reactivity, 4th ed., Harper Collins, New York, NY, USA (1993).

      5 5. Sun, X. An Integrated Approach to the Lewis Model, Valence Bond Theory, and Molecular Orbital Theory: A New Model for Simple Molecular Orbitals and a Quicker Way of Learning Covalent Bonding in General Chemistry. Chem. Educator, 2007, 12, 331–334.

      6 6. Fox, M. A.; Whitesell, J. K. Core Organic Chemistry, 2nd ed., Jones and Bartlett, Sudbury, MA, USA (1997).

      7 7. Olah, G. A. 100 Years of Carbocations and Their Significance in Chemistry. J. Org. Chem. 2001, 66, 5943–5957.

      8 8. Voet, D.; Voet, J. G.; Pratt, C. W. Fundamentals of Biochemistry, 5th ed., John Wiley & Sons, Inc., Hoboken, NJ, USA (2016).

      9 9. Butler, R. N.; Coyne, A. G. Water: Nature's Reaction Enforcer–Comparative Effects for Organic Synthesis “In‐Water” and “On‐Water”. Chem. Rev. 2010, 110, 6302–6337.

      10 10. Simon, M.‐O.; Li, C.‐J. Green Chemistry Oriented Organic Synthesis in Water. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2012, 41, 1415–1427.

      11 11. Narayan, S.; Muldoon, J.; Finn, M. G.; Fokin, V. V.; Kolb, H. C.; Barry Sharpless, K. “On Water”: Unique Reactivity of Organic Compounds in Aqueous Suspension. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2005, 44, 3275 –3279.

      12 12. Klijn, J. E.; Engberts, J. B. F. N. Fast Reactions “On Water”. Nature, 2005, 435, 746–747.

      13 13. Scatena, L. F.; Brown, M. G.; Richard, G. L. Water at Hydrophobic Surfaces: Weak Hydrogen Bonding and Strong Orientation Effects. Science, 2001, 292, 908–912.

      14 14. Jung, Y.; Marcus, R. A. On the Theory of Organic Catalysis “On Water”. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2007, 129, 5492–5502.