Скачать книгу

defined as a contract between the profession and the public (represented by the State). As a part of the contract, the profession promises that all members of the public will be served by good doctors and protected from bad ones. In turn the public, via the State, gives the profession a high level of autonomy over its own affairs. There are arguments for and against self‐regulation. The first in favor of self‐regulation is that medicine is so complex that doctors themselves are best placed to define standards that differentiate between good and unacceptable practice. The second argument is that if doctors as a body have a sense of ownership of these standards, then they are more likely to adhere to them. The argument goes that such a model of self‐regulation, if balanced with processes to ensure the public has a loud voice, is the best to achieve the desired outcome – a safer service for patients.

      Professional regulation has two key elements. The first is at the level of the individual doctor. This requires individual doctors to exercise self‐discipline. This requirement is of paramount importance considering the clinical scenarios facing most doctors on a daily basis where they have to make decisions, with patients, based on less than optimal evidence (Bate et al. 2012).

      The second element lies at the collective level where the profession as a whole is required to ensure that current practice, in general, is in line with the accepted standards in operation at that time. These standards are by their nature changing frequently. For example, the legal framework underpinning the process of obtaining consent in the UK changed significantly after the Montgomery case in 2015 (Chan et al. 2017).

      In order to set the context for the current regulatory framework in medicine, explored in Chapter 3, the history of the evolution of regulation for nursing, physiotherapy, and medicine will be briefly explored here. The evolution of regulation of each of these professions are intrinsically linked as the social and political pressures and levers have been similar for each.

      The term “nurse” is derived from the Italian word, nutrire, meaning to feed, nourish or suckle a baby. The earliest written records of nurses are from the Roman Empire.

      Throughout the early middle ages, health care and therefore nursing in England was set within and controlled by the churches, mainly the Roman Catholic Church.

      The Reformation, a movement across Europe, began in about 1517 driven in part by Martin Luther, and posed serious political and religious challenges to the Roman Catholic Church and specifically to the authority of the Pope. In England, the Reformation under the reign of Henry VIII led to the Church of England breaking away from Catholicism. This then led to the dissolution of monasteries between 1536 and 1541, and the shutting down of the associated hospitals and infirmary buildings. This has come to be known as the “Dark Age of Nursing” as the English Reformation resulted in many hospitals being closed down. The larger hospitals in London such as St Thomas’ and St Bartholomew’s, although at risk through the Reformation, were able to survive with their management taken over by the City of London. Henry VIII’s only son Edward VI ordered charters for the continued use of these organizations and institutions as hospitals.

      Throughout this period there was no, or very little, formal training for those who considered nursing as a job. Nurses were seen as subordinates, servants and individuals who were given nursing jobs instead of, for example, a prison sentence. Nurses were generally disregarded by society and other health professions.

      The professional era for nursing began with the establishment of the first training school for nursing in Kaiserswerth, Germany, in 1836. The school was founded by the Lutheran Order of Deaconesses for the purpose of providing high‐quality nursing training to the Deaconesses.

      The Anglican Nursing Sisterhood of St John’s had developed a Nurse Teaching School in London in approximately 1848. As well as providing successful clinical training, the nursing school supported the individual’s spiritual calling with a real emphasis on the all‐important Christian duty expected in this Victorian era.

      It is argued that the world’s first non‐religious nurse training school, “La Source” was established in Lausanne in Switzerland. It was founded in 1859, a year before the Nightingale Training School in St Thomas’ opened.

      Florence Nightingale, considered by most to be the founder of modern nursing, studied at Kaiserswerth and on returning to England she became superintendent for the Institution for the Care of Sick Gentlewomen in Distressed Circumstances in London.

      The Crimean War began in 1853, and news reports described deplorable conditions and a lack of medical or nursing care for injured British troops. Nightingale was asked by the British Government to go to the Crimea and organize better care for the troops. Accompanied by a number of nurses, Nightingale found the troops experiencing horrifying conditions. She set about transforming the general conditions of the soldiers, and the main impact was as a result of improvements in sanitation and hygiene, leading to improved clinical outcomes.

      Following her experiences in the Crimea, Nightingale returned to London and in 1860 established the first secular nurse training school in the UK at St Thomas’ Hospital London – the Nightingale Training School. Nightingale’s new training system was described as ground‐breaking at that time. It was noted that the Nightingale Training School, while being the second non‐religious nursing school, adopted the “sisterhood” approach to training and instigated the ward system. Nightingale’s initiative was opposed by many physicians at the time who argued that nurses needed only minimal training, enough to provide cleanliness, poultice‐making and attending to patients’ personal needs (Kalish and Kalish 1995). History records that Nightingale set up the foundations for non‐secular training of women of “good character” from all backgrounds. A further unique element of Nightingale’s approach was the recognition of science as the essential basis for nursing care.

      In 1849 Pastor Fliedner, who was the driving force in setting up Kaiserswerth, established the first Protestant hospital in America. The trained Deaconesses who travelled with him started the first formal nurse training program in the Pittsburgh Infirmary, Pennsylvania, which still exists today as the Passavant Hospital.

      When state registration of doctors in the UK began in 1858, there was also a call for registration of trained nurses. In 1887, the British Nurses Association was created and received the Royal Charter in 1892, becoming the Royal British Nurses Association (RBNA). Princess Helena, the daughter of Queen Victoria, was president of the RBNA and was keen to enhance the training and status of nursing. The RBNA was in favor of registration as a means to ensure and enhance the professional status of trained nurses.

      In addition, nursing increasingly contributed to the war effort. There was a significant increase

Скачать книгу